What's new

Kashmir files vs The Shudra

You want us to watch Hindu oppression ****😂😂😂😂

This shit is made for bakhts to masturbate over, not anyone else
What's a bakht?

As in 'bakht bakht ki baat hai?

And yet you go on and on about those ratings I wonder why 🤔
Something that lets me crow over dunces. Of course, I can't crow over you, since you aren't a dunce, just saying what it's good for.
 
Let's just clarify how this Hindu oppression **** works


They make this bullshit, so the hindus/bakhts/hindutawadi can use their Hindu victim cards to justify targeting and persecution of Indian Muslims

This is a continuation of the degradation of Indian society into a utter communal cesspit
 
What's a bakht?

As in 'bakht bakht ki baat hai?


Something that lets me crow over dunces. Of course, I can't crow over you, since you aren't a dunce, just saying what it's good for.
You sure put them in their place with your mighty ratings
 
Let's just clarify how this Hindu oppression **** works


They make this bullshit, so the hindus/bakhts/hindutawadi can use their Hindu victim cards to justify targeting and persecution of Indian Muslims

This is a continuation of the degradation of Indian society into a utter communal cesspit
But what about muh kashmiri pundits? What do you mean I can’t kill millions of Muslims illegally occupy their land just because 1000 pundshits can’t live there?

Oh no, I don't.

That's the fun part.

They keep crawling around, thinking they are something more than what they are.
Then they aren’t really that different from you
 
If we take your claim of being a Muslim seriously then you should know yourself

Muslims have been Communist before your grandfather was born. :)

But for you to start learning please do read from here on and the full thread there :
During the same period (1920s-30s), another (though lesser known) Islamic scholar in undivided India got smitten by the 1917 Russian revolution and Marxism.

Hafiz Rahman Sihwarwl saw Islam and Marxism sharing five elements in common: (1) prohibition of the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the privileged classes (2) organisation of the economic structure of the state to ensure social welfare (3) equality of opportunity for all human beings (4) priority of collective social interest over individual privilege and (5) prevention of the permanentising of class structure through social revolution.

The motivations for many of these themes he drew from the Qur’an, which he understood as seeking to create an economic order in which the rich pay excessive, though voluntary taxes (Zakat) to minimise differences in living standards.

In the areas that Sihwarwl saw Islam and communism diverge were Islam’s sanction of private ownership within certain limits, and in its refusal to recognise an absolutely classless basis of society.

He suggested that Islam, with its prohibition of the accumulation of wealth, is able to control the class structure through equality of opportunity.

Basically, both Sindhi and Sihwarwl had stumbled upon an Islamic concept of the social democratic welfare state.

Building upon the initial thoughts of Sindhi and Sihwarwl were perhaps South Asia’s two most ardent and articulate supporters and theoreticians of Islamic Socilaism: Ghulam Ahmed Parvez and Dr. Khalifa Abdul Hakim.

Parvez was a prominent ‘Quranist’, or an Islamic scholar who insisted that for the Muslims to make progress in the modern world, Islamic thought and laws should be entirely based on the modern interpretations of the Qu’ran and on the complete rejection of the hadith (sayings of the Prophet and his companions based on hearsay and compiled over a 100 years after the Prophet’s demise).

After studying traditional Muslim texts, as well as Sufism, Parvez claimed that almost all hadiths were fabrications by those who wanted Islam to seem like an intolerant faith and by ancient Muslim kings who used these hadiths to give divine legitimacy to their tyrannical rules.

Parvez also insisted that Muslims should spend more time studying the modern sciences instead of wasting their energies on fighting out ancient sectarian conflicts or ignoring the true egalitarian and enlightening spirit of the Qu’ran by indulging in multiple rituals handed down to them by ancient ulema, clerics and compilers of the hadith.

Understandably, Parvez was right away attacked by conservative Islamic scholars and political outfits.

But this didn’t stop famous Muslim philosopher and poet, Muhammad Iqbal, to befriend the young scholar and then introduce him to the future founder of Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

Jinnah appointed Parvez to edit a magazine, Talu-e-Islam. It was set-up to propagate the creation of a separate Muslim country and to also answer the attacks that Jinnah’s All India Muslim League had begun to face from conservative Islamic parties and ulema who accused the League of being a pseudo-Muslim organisation and Jinnah for being too westernised and ‘lacking correct Islamic behavior.’

Apart from continuing to author books and commentaries on the Qu’ran, Parvez wrote a series of articles in Talu-e-Islam that propagated a more socialistic view of the holy book.

In a series of essays for the magazine he used verses from the Qu’ran, incidents from the faith’s history and insights from the writings of Muhammad Iqbal to claim:

The clergy and conservative ulema have hijacked Islam.

They are agents of the rich people and promoters of uncontrolled Capitalism.

Socialism best enforces Qur’anic dictums on property, justice and distribution of wealth.

Islam’s main mission was the eradication of all injustices and cruelties from society. It was a socio-economic movement, and the Prophet was a leader seeking to put an end to the capitalist exploitation of the Quraysh merchants and the corrupt bureaucracy of Byzantium and Persia.

According to the Qur’an, Muslims have three main responsibilities: seeing, hearing and sensing through the agency of the mind. Consequently, real knowledge is based on empirically verifiable observation, or through the role of science.

Poverty is the punishment of God and deserved by those who ignore science.

In Muslim/Islamic societies, science, as well as agrarian reform should play leading roles in developing an industrialised economy.

A socialist path is a correction of the medieval distortion of Islam through Shari’a.
If Faiz Ahmed Faiz and his Communist-Socialist comrades had succeeded in establishing Communist or Socialist governance in Pakistan in 1951 then you would have been not saying this. :)
 
Your Army came into my village in 1971 and murdered some of my family members and neighbors, Hindus, and Muslims. Of course, this purity spiral will eat you guys alive.

Yeah guess what south Asia is shit, we need separation

I don't know why you people can't understand this, your trying to prolong a disaster in this masquerade called India

Your getting everyone stuck, and this oppression **** is part of the process to justify oppression and your own animosity and hatred

I.e,,, oh look how Hindus were killed, we must unite against Indian Muslims (when in reality multiple pogroms have occured in India and south Asia, more people died in the Gujrat riots),


I mean I don't care, I already hate Hindus but then it dosent matter as I am in Pakistan

Separation works, but it's incomplete in India

India needs partition
 
Muslims have been Communist before your grandfather was born. :)

But for you to start learning please do read from here on and the full thread there :

If Faiz Ahmed Faiz and his Communist-Socialist comrades had succeeded in establishing Communist or Socialist governance in Pakistan in 1951 then you would have been not saying this. :)
Lol stupid analogy

Just because Islam and communism have something “in common” that doesn’t validate that atheist cult of yours Judaism and Christianity have a lot in common too but that doesn’t validate their false beliefs

Quran is the complete code of life and prophet Muhammad’s life is a perfect example of how Muslims are supposed to live

I don’t need explanations from a 20th century self proclaimed hafiz/mullah to validate commie atheist cult

Perhaps educate yourself

This is one of the slogans of communism, which is an ideology that is materialistic in nature and in its ideas, methodology and philosophy. It also has other slogans that are indicative of deep adherence to materialism, to the point of atheism, such as “The only way to unite the world is on the basis of materialism”, “Matter existed before thought”, “There was never a time when matter did not exist”, “Man is the product of matter”, “Thought is the product of the brain, and the brain is the product of matter.”
The one who thinks that communism – or, more precisely, socialism – is merely a school of economic thought is mistaken. Rather it is a philosophy that is materialistic in the way in which it explains influential factors and the nature of society, and it relies on dialectics in the way it explains history.

The best theory with regard to its origins is that it is one of the ideas that were formed in Western minds as a result of the conflict with the church and the clergy throughout many centuries, when oppression, suppression and tyranny were the hallmarks of that period. Hence atheism, secularism, communism, capitalism and other ideologies emerged as alternatives to the long centuries of the Dark Ages; they took over those societies and are still ruling them. Indeed they have become methodologies and ways of thinking, and philosophies in which their followers believe, and on the basis of which the thinkers developed theories.

Scholars and thinkers have written a great deal about the materialism of communism. Here we will quote some of the most prominent and clearest things that have been written, so that we may reach a brief definition of this principle.

In al-Mawsoo‘ah al-Muyassarah fi’l-Adyaan wa’l-Madhaahib wa’l-Ahzaab al-Mu‘aasirah (p. 929-934) it says:

Communism:

1. Definition

Communism is a school of thought based on atheism and the belief that matter is the basis of all things. It explains history in terms of class conflict and economic forces.

It appeared in Germany at the hands of Marx (d. 1883) and Engels (d. 1895), and was manifested in the Bolshevik revolution which occurred in Russia (1917) at the instigation of the Jews. It expanded at the expense of other ideologies, by force. Lenin (d. 1924) is the one who put communism into practice, followed by Stalin (d. 1953), the secretary of the Communist Party.

2. Main ideas and beliefs

- Denial of the existence of God and the unseen in general, and belief that matter is the basis of all things.

- They explain history in terms of conflict between the bourgeoisie and proletariat (the capitalists and the poor). According to their view, conflicts will end with the dictatorship of the proletariat.

- They oppose all religions and regard them as the opiate of the masses and servants of capitalism, imperialism and exploitation.

- They oppose private ownership and say that all wealth should be held in common between people and that inheritance should be abolished.

- Every change in the world, according to their view, is the inevitable result of changes in the means of production, and that thought, civilization and culture are the products of economic development.

- They say that morality is relative and is a reflection of the means of production.

- They believe that there is no hereafter, no punishment, and no reward except in the life of this world.

- In their view, the ends justify the means

Lenin said: “Destruction of three quarters of the world is nothing; what matters is that the remaining quarter become communist.”

3. Spread and areas of influence

Communism has ruled a number of countries, including the Soviet Union, China, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria, Poland, East Germany, Romania, Yugoslavia, Albania and Cuba

Collapse of Marxism

Communism collapsed in its strongholds after seventy years of communist rule, and after forty years of application of its ideas in Eastern Europe. Senior officials in the Soviet Union, before its dismantling, announced that many Marxist principles were no longer fit to remain and were unable to deal with the problems and requirements of modern times. Everyone was convinced that it is a corrupt theory. It is impossible to apply, because it carries within itself the seeds of its own destruction. One of the greatest critics of Marxism among the Marxists themselves is the American philosopher Eric Mizom in his book The Sound Society; others among non-Marxists include Karl Popper, the author of The Open Society, and others. Then Gorbachev came along with his book Perestroika (Reconstruction), in which he exposed the problems in the application of communism in the Soviet Union. End quote.

To sum up, the principles of communism are principles based on disbelief (kufr), and it is not permissible for any Muslim to believe in them or embrace them, or to join those who believe in them. A fatwa to that effect was issued by the Islamic Fiqh Council of the Muslim World League, which you can see by following this link.

And Allah knows best.

Quoted from Islamqa.info
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom