Rahi812
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2014
- Messages
- 629
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
1.Firstly, seeing a lopsided view, I believe your roots are in Pakistan, so before posting be brave enough to post the flag of your country of origin and flag of your normal residence if both differ.
2. The underlined and bold part? Please give a breakdown. It is boring to spank any new wannabe expert every other day who arrives exhibiting an aura of intellect incarnate. If you do not have the breakdown, wherein people who have taken up arms against a legal state and been dealt as armed rebels, or where the said people have not indulged in acts of randomly initiating a gunfight with scant regard to civil population, and indeed the armed forces (it is not Indian Army. your inability to discern between the forces is pointing to a highly entertaining spank session) have engaged in a deliberate and planned execution of the populance who are peaceful and law abiding (inclusive of the laws enacted by the state under their autonomous authority to curb civil unrest and disorderly conduct and makes it a point to adequately inform and warn about prohibitory orders), be prepared to be labelled a liar at every post of yours subsequently.
3. As for your solution, since I have my strong suspicion of you being another false flagger from our neighbouring country, may I suggest you read your history including the resolutions wherein the said matter has been discussed and tell me at any point wherein the point of original contention of the peope of valley - a right to self determination has been affirmed by Pakistan as a self appointed party to dispute? Even in Shimla agreement, can you show me the existence of the third option, other than either India or Pakistan? If you read, and do not have a limbic system malfunction (short circuit of your Papez Circuit) you will realise that while all our dear Pakistani members take pains to cry for Azadi and support the Kashmiris in this struggle, yet at no point have they ever involved themselves in ANY document/treaty wherein the same is re-affirmed or contended by them. In short, the duplicity is apparent, only ignorant fools and downright retards are unable to comprehend the ramifications.
@Azlan Haider The third point ONLY. Your comments?
when it came to solution you onl
I see a massive change in India's policy for P0K and Baluchistan. Correct me if I am wrong but this is the first time an Indian Prime Minister has spoken on Baluchistan and Pakistan's occupied territory.
Way to go Mr. Prime Minister.
I dont think that is a right policy rather a destructive policy. Right now it is a time to address the Kashmir issue according to the demands of the people. Otherwise fire from Kashmir will burn whole India.