A hypocritical state fighting a hypocritical battle.I never seem to understand the Pakistani position on Kashmir. On one side they say that Azad Kashmir is Azad Kashmir with independent legislative body and externally supported by Pakistan, where as in case of any negotiations upon Kashmir, the representatives of that Independent legislative body are missing, its just the Pakistani state.I wonder how many Pakistanis even know the name of the Prime Minister of Azad Kashmir, so much so for never ending love for Kashmir.
Why Mr. Ambassador has only written about the issues of J&K whereas his own countrymen are sitting on a major portion of Kashmir. Where are the Azad leaders of Azad Kashmir who may ask for negotiations with the Indian state, I never heard of one since Amanullah Khan. So my suggestion to Mr. Ambassador is that he needs to shed this hypocrisy and look inwards first, how they been treating Kashmiris in their own dominion.
Mr. Ambassador talks about demographic engineering, whereas his own state has been doing the same for decades now, bringing in more and more Punjabis to settle into Kashmir. Also,every Pakistani commentator fails to add the state of Gilgit & Baltistan which is also a part of the dispute and if a referendum ever comes up, residents of Gilgit and Baltistan will also be included to put in their choices.
Why do Pakistanis always come up with such "mutually acceptable" proposals whereas India will be deemed a looser? And why should India accept such proposals.
