Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FOXNews.com - No. 1 Nation in Sexy Web Searches? Call it Pornistan
Pakistan is top dog in searches per-person for "horse sex" since 2004, "donkey sex" since 2007, "rape pictures" between 2004 and 2009, "rape sex" since 2004, "child sex" between 2004 and 2007 and since 2009, "animal sex" since 2004 and "dog sex" since 2005, according to Google Trends and Google Insights, features of Google that generate data based on popular search terms.
The country also is tops -- or has been No. 1 -- in searches for "sex," "camel sex," "rape video," "child sex video" and some other searches that can't be printed here.
Freaking hilarious. I would love to see what the neighbors in India are surfing for also.Probably a similar list.
"horse sex?"..WTF
Privacy Settings >> Basic Directory Information, View Settings >> Send me friend requests, change it to Friends of Friends (though it must have been 'no one')
There will be a time when You **** will out class You Tube
i know what indians like to watch!!! or should i say read
Savita Bhabhi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Who pays for ****?
you seem really into it...i never knew YouTube has an adult brother..
Where this thread is going on
I wont comment on this practice of searching such sites but how do people have so much time
Where this thread is going on
I wont comment on this practice of searching such sites but how do people have so much time
It is not. If you do a search on the arrests on 'child ****' for the last several years, you will find many accompanying commentaries that most of those arrests usually involve 'underage' girls either in the nude or minimally dressed but in sexually provocative poses. We basically widen the definition of 'child ****' to include this type.What the heck? people that search for that kind of material have some mental issues.
Also how can child **** be so easily searched, doesn't Pakistan have laws against viewing child ****?
The cases appear to provide new ammunition to critics of the “model” sites, which charge members a monthly fee to view photos of under-18 girls — including some as young as 8 or 9 — wearing revealing attire and striking suggestive poses. The majority of the sites do not feature nudity or overtly sexual material, but the cases currently in the courts indicate that some operators are happy to push the envelope.