No they are defending Karachi against terrorists of MQM and other mafias you support
I don't support Taliban. That's your job.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No they are defending Karachi against terrorists of MQM and other mafias you support
Rangers is the largest armed Mafia occupying Karachi.
You support MQM terrorists and other secular criminalsI don't support Taliban. That's your job.
The correct position then is to do away with the charade of democracy & give power to the army. Why bother with elections at all if you simply place no value on the people you elect.
Only in Pakistan can these things happen:
# The army helps during floods & the common refrain is that "the government did nothing, only the army did"....
- In most other states the army is an organ of the state & is part of the government response.
# Only in Pakistan can the army negotiate with the elected government on intervention when the government is being put under siege
# Now the rangers are deciding what should be government policy.
Only in Pakistan can a paramilitary force of the state (the rangers) challenge the writ of the state itself. How can the Rangers reply that " no one will be allowed to create hurdles at public places and close key roads and streets"? That would either be a government decision or a court decision. How do the Rangers get a say in it especially if that is against the expressed wishes of the home ministry.
what make you post in this thread without knowing anything .... believe me by this comment you are portraying yourself as an 'ignorant idiot' (I am really very sorry to say this but it is the case as you wanna a comment about the subject you no knowledge).
Rangers is acting as per the 'supreme court' orders.
You support MQM terrorists and other secular criminals
what make you post in this thread without knowing anything .... believe me by this comment you are portraying yourself as an 'ignorant idiot' (I am really very sorry to say this but it is the case as you wanna a comment about the subject you no knowledge).
Rangers is acting as per the 'supreme court' orders.
Only in Pakistan can a paramilitary force of the state (the rangers) challenge the writ of the state itself. How can the Rangers reply that " no one will be allowed to create hurdles at public places and close key roads and streets"? That would either be a government decision or a court decision. How do the Rangers get a say in it especially if that is against the expressed wishes of the home ministry.
Link please. Was the orders issued to the Rangers? In any case you obviously don't bother reading. I responded specifically to the tone of the letter written by the Rangers & pointed out that any such order must come either from the executive or the judiciary. If the Rangers were only following court orders, then that is what the reply should have said. It didn't, hence the question.
Btw, there is another chap who doesn't seem to know about these orders. He is the IG Sindh - Ghulam Hyder Jamali who categorically said the concrete structure along Bilawal House could not be demolished due to persistent security threats to the facility which was given the status of the president’s camp office from 2008 to 2013.
Link please. Was the orders issued to the Rangers?
Was the orders issued to the Rangers?
You have right of opinion but to me, Altaf Bhai and his sector commanders are biggest mafia beside few othersRangers is the largest armed Mafia occupying Karachi.
Thank you for your opinion. Rangers is a Law Enforcement Agency, mandated by government after achieving consensus of all parties for an across the board operation. If barrier are being removed all over Karachi including 90 and Musharraf's residence then Bilawal House is no exception and rule must be executed equally for all Pakistanis. By the way Bilawal House has not only erected barriers, in fact they have encroached roads.Only in Pakistan can a paramilitary force of the state (the rangers) challenge the writ of the state itself. How can the Rangers reply that " no one will be allowed to create hurdles at public places and close key roads and streets"? That would either be a government decision or a court decision. How do the Rangers get a say in it especially if that is against the expressed wishes of the home ministry.
I believe a criminal or terrorist can not be differentiated as political, religious or secular, they are criminals and terrorists only and nothing else.You support MQM terrorists and other secular criminals
Here we go , the much waited political battle & the downfall of noora & zardari mafia basses damocrazy ?
Well we pakistanis don't have a rogue army. Or bastard generals. Our army is God fearing. So **** democracy. It's good we taking steps to becoming democratic. But army rule has been better in our country so far.The correct position then is to do away with the charade of democracy & give power to the army. Why bother with elections at all if you simply place no value on the people you elect.
Only in Pakistan can these things happen:
# The army helps during floods & the common refrain is that "the government did nothing, only the army did"....
- In most other states the army is an organ of the state & is part of the government response.
# Only in Pakistan can the army negotiate with the elected government on intervention when the government is being put under siege
# Now the rangers are deciding what should be government policy.