New Recruit
and Mayawati was erecting her own statues and elephants all across UP till the supreme court hit her butt for using the state money for the party projection. we need to send them urgently.
who said we do not have the match for zardari... tum ek zardari ko rote ho yaha gali gali main zardari hote hain
Bro zardari stands for Zar and dari
and u know Zar means Maal dolat
==========================================
New Recruit
Plz dont abuse chooooorz yeh saly unky bhi bapoo k baaap hain
==========================================
New Recruit
Hahaha, totally agree....
Plz dont abuse chooooorz yeh saly unky bhi bapoo k baaap hain
==========================================
Waisy mazy ki baat k choro ko bhi kahi na khai sharam ati hogi insalo ko nhi ati ............. toooooooooooootlyyyyyyyyy biztiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii proooooooooooooooooof hoty hain
==================================
Waisy mazy ki baat k choro ko bhi kahi na khai sharam ati hogi insalo ko nhi ati ............. toooooooooooootlyyyyyyyyy biztiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii proooooooooooooooooof hoty hain
==================================
New Recruit
soooooooooooooo strange na????And on top of that when they are caught, they say, "It's a conspiracy by the Opposition party to defame them."
The new edition (2012) of the Atlas of Islamic Republic of Pakistan is an interesting source to examine the Pakistani position on this issue. The atlas has official status; its copyright is marked as “Government of Pakistan,” it was printed by the Survey of Pakistan, and it was published under the direction of Surveyor-General of Pakistan. Not surprisingly, its maps portray Kashmir as part of Pakistan, but they do mark most of this area as “Disputed Territory,” further specifying that its eastern border with China remains “undefined.” The Atlas does, however, oddly exclude Gilgit from the disputed zone. It also never marks the actual line of control that separates Indian-administered from Pakistani-administered territory.
The truly peculiar feature of the atlas, however, is not its portrayal of Kashmir, but rather that of the Indian state of Gujarat. All maps of Pakistan in the atlas depict a sizable section of western Gujarat as an integral, non-disputed part of Pakistan, whereas its world political map seemingly classifies this same region as if it were an independent country. The area in question is the former princely state of Junagadh. In the imagination of the cartographer, “Junagadh and Manavadar” retains its former complex territory, with numerous exclaves and enclaves, that in actuality vanished shortly after the end of British India. Such fractionated territoriality reflects its heritage as an autonomous statelet that had been under the suzerainty of the British Raj during colonial time. After partition, Junagadh became part of the Republic of India, but evidently that incorporation is still viewed as illegitimate in some
Pakistani governmental circles. The map in question also portrays the city of Diu as remaining under Portuguese control, whereas in actuality it was annexed by India in 1961.
Another complicating factor was the extraordinarily complex and essentially feudal nature of the political geography of India’s princely states, especially those in Gujarat (see http://www.indiastaterevenues.com/Templates/kathiaw.html for a superb map, reproduced here at a reduced scale). Manavadar, for example, formed a separate territory under the vassalage Junagadh, which in turn was something of a vassal of the much more populous state of Baroda, which had been ruled by a Hindu Maharaja. According to some sources, such subordination meant that their rulers had no right to choose between India and Pakistan. As outlined in a different Wikipedia article:
