What's new

July 4, 1999 - The Day Clinton Stopped Pakistan from Nuking india

Pakistan went to ask his former daddy.

who become your pimp now.. shreded shrimp.

ghanta.... g@@nd me dum hai nahi.. hum kisi se kam hain nahi :lol:
abe itna hi dum hai pakistan me to le le na kashmir... :bunny: after2008 there is no major terrorist attack has happened but look at your pure land :lol: ghar ko sambhalna seekho pehele.. koi bhi aa ke bomb fod jata hai.. koi bhi aake drone mar jata hai... saalon unpe nuke na sahi dhang se goli maarna to seekh lo .. kuch nahi ho sakta tum logo ka :disagree:

kis behenchod ne ise featured thread bana diya be .. pehele jake history padh le fir khush hona :bunny:.. lagta hai yaha ke padhe likhe bhi unpadh jaise hain.. ummah ke chummah ke chakkar me barbaad ho jaoge saalon :rofl:


mu rait mein chupnay say khatra talta nahi.. apnay fouji gino 10 hazar to kam hongay hi .. roz ka aik girta hai siachin mein. har haftay 10-15 Asaam nagaland aab kashmir or punjab bhi counting mein anaywaylay hain ..
or zuban gandi kernay say koi sher nahi hojata.. 1.25 billions or nah dum hai or har kesi say kam hai...
internet kay pehlwan ho tum loog.. or media per rotay ho..
 
.
Look whos Talking
mean while in india

That is the video of German V2 during WWII .

The orginal video has been posted by @Guynextdoor2

I won't be surprised if it turns out that the retard who has edited this video and posted in youtube is a Pakistani .

Although there were failures , falling back in the launch site itself has never been reported about Indian missiles .

Mean while in Pakistan ,

In April 1998 when we were ready to launch the Ghauri missile from the site prepared at Kahuta, we were told to fire it from Tilla, Jhelum instead.
.
.
.

Our launching time was 7:30 am. At 7:22 I was informed by an army officer that the missile launch from Son Miani under Samar Mubarakmand had flopped. It had simply rolled over and burst into flame. There were reports of casualties, but these were never confirmed.

Pakistan Nuclear History- A Q Khan Version | Page 3
 
. .
Haha, they never had the balls to use their small Air Force let alone nukes while Infiltrators were reduced to dust by Airstrikes,Artillery, Beheadings and even chemical weapons.

Nawaz embarrassed himself after crashing the Clinton party of 4th of July the same date when tiger hill complex was recaptured :lol:
 
. .
A monkey brain only can come up with such immature conclusion.No shame left at all after getting humiliated at world stage numerous times.:DA country what's survival depends only on India bashing.We don't ask permission from any nation,we use them...


it was a response to your childish immature and valgure language...... Lakhvi wali zillat bhool gye ho kya :D
 
.
I wish Pakistan & Pakistanis would stop prefixing Nuclear to themselves.

Such silly remarks show the immaturity the world fears - a nation willing to cut its nose to spite their face .

Aren't you thinking harder than what your brain can process?
Just to let SecularNationalist like you know that the time taken to get ready a nuclear missile for launch in pakistan is lot more than time to be taken by Indian side to neutralize them.
So unless the nuke missiles in kept on active mode, the current delivery mechanism doesnt have any surprise element for India, especially given the wast range of deep monitoring systems that we have :)
Such amateur comments on PDF shows how insecure indians are.Or how little they know about our nuclear striking capabilities.I know it,s hard for you to accept the fact that india cannot afford to have a war with pakistan and if they try then india will no longer exist.And it, even more painful for the staunch hindus because India is the only hindu nation in the world and no india means no Hinduism .Our nukes are capable of putting your beloved religion in the category of "extinct religions"
 
.
Shame on you Nuclear power for letting your enemy use Chemical weapons on your people or soldiers.

BBC News | South Asia | India 'using chemical weapons' in Kashmir
Do you understand the meaning of ' used in the title itself? BBC is not reporting that India is using chemical weapons. They are quoting someone saying that India is using chemical weapon. This accusation can be completely baseless (which it was) and BBC was just reporting what Pakistani think and not what they found. Read the article first before posting it here. "Pakistan has produced no evidence for its allegation, but says it wants to get independent experts into the disputed Kashmir region to establish the truth."
 
.
Hi,
Pak is a the best Best Army (Fauj of Mujahids #acc to PDF)...Haven't Lost any war to india/Israel/USSR/World/kafirs etc. Etc etc .....

But why Uncle Mushi refused to take the Dead bodies of the Officers of your Army.
A.K.A The Martyrs of Gazwa-e-Hind???
 
.
Such amateur comments on PDF shows how insecure indians are.Or how little they know about our nuclear striking capabilities.I know it,s hard for you to accept the fact that india cannot afford to have a war with pakistan and if they try then india will no longer exist.And it, even more painful for the staunch hindus because India is the only hindu nation in the world and no india means no Hinduism .Our nukes are capable of putting your beloved religion in the category of "extinct religions"

Dear lolipop buddy, go and read how long it takes to arm a passive nuclear weapon.

For sake of your knowledge, India is not Hindu's country, its Indians country. We have more muslim then entire pakistan. We have more christians then some of the european nations. Its your pathetic mentality that sees this as war of Muslims verses Hindu's. Trust me in case of war, Indian muslims will hit pakistan much harder then any other religious sect people.

And histroy has shown that many dumbheaded people who thought they could wipe out Hindusim from India, actually got themselves wipped out from sub continent. The religion has been here from 1000s of years and will be here in future too.
So stop worrying about the religion, worry about your state of affairs..like Nuke could not be fired because of load shedding and non availability of oil for generators :P
 
.
Dear lolipop buddy, go and read how long it takes to arm a passive nuclear weapon.

For sake of your knowledge, India is not Hindu's country, its Indians country. We have more muslim then entire pakistan. We have more christians then some of the european nations. Its your pathetic mentality that sees this as war of Muslims verses Hindu's. Trust me in case of war, Indian muslims will hit pakistan much harder then any other religious sect people.

And histroy has shown that many dumbheaded people who thought they could wipe out Hindusim from India, actually got themselves wipped out from sub continent. The religion has been here from 1000s of years and will be here in future too.
So stop worrying about the religion, worry about your state of affairs..like Nuke could not be fired because of load shedding and non availability of oil for generators :P
you dont understand their desparation thing is neuking india or making india suffer is their onli hope to revive their position as they think if inida goes down they will rise but they themselfs know its not that simple rather its opposite but deu to collective bluffs of hate and revenge drilled into them wia their own elite for genrataion now they have lost the grip on reality

baki aap khud samjhdaar ho :)
 
. .
Without getting into jingoism - the fact is that Pakistani leadership has used its nukes to blackmail the world. What Nawaz said was - "Tell India to stop the Kargil operation - and get to the negotiating table - else this could spiral into a nuclear war." Just before this - Sartaz Aziz demanded a meeting with Jaswant Singh which lasted all of 5 minutes, the crux was - Pakistan told India to stop Kargil offensive and India refused. Pakistan's problem in Kargil was -

a. It all along claimed that these were "freedom fighters" when in reality they were Army Regulars.

b. India used their Air Force and Pakistan because it claimed these were not Army regulars could not provide any Air Support.

c. India pounded them with Bofors - Pakistan had not taken the power of these guns into account. India lifted sanctions on Bofors to imports the necessary bullets.

d. Pakistan was looking at a face-saving exit. So while Nawaz agreed with Clinton to evacuate from the Kargil heights - India continued to shoot the Pakistanis even when they were on their way down. This probably was the catalyst for the coup which followed. The Pakistani soldiers were left high and dry.

e. Lastly, I remember quite clearly that Nawaz inserted one line to the Clinton joint statement which stated that Bill Clinton would take a "personal interest" in resolving the Kashmir dispute. In those days the Pakistanis were showing this as some form of victory - that no American President has vowed to take a "personal interest" in Kashmir. In reality - it was America pretty much saying - "Err, sorry - The United States can't help you." Surely, someone can dig up that joint statement.

And don't talk about using nukes as if it is some form of joke. Generations continue to suffer in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Responsible states should not engage in nuclear brinksmanship.

All said and done - I still fear that a stray nuke would probably emanate from North Korea - that guy there is a complete nutjob - feed his uncle to hungry dogs and what not. Pakistan probably has a pretty secure grasp on its nukes - but it would like the world to believe that - "hey - that nuke can fall into the wrong hands here - then all bets are off." It is a very risky bluff and while it may work every now and then - at some point, it might backfire royally. It is one thing to blackmail Clinton - imagine this same conversation with Cheney - he would probably have marched in troops into Pakistan.

Such amateur comments on PDF shows how insecure indians are.Or how little they know about our nuclear striking capabilities.I know it,s hard for you to accept the fact that india cannot afford to have a war with pakistan and if they try then india will no longer exist.And it, even more painful for the staunch hindus because India is the only hindu nation in the world and no india means no Hinduism .Our nukes are capable of putting your beloved religion in the category of "extinct religions"

Let me just quote you Allama Iqbal -

Yunan-o-misr-o-roma, sab mit gaye jahan se
Ab tak magar hai baqi, nam-o-nishan hamara

Kuch bat hai keh hasti, mitati nahin hamari
Sadiyon raha hai dushman, daur-e-zaman hamara
 
.
Without getting into jingoism - the fact is that Pakistani leadership has used its nukes to blackmail the world. What Nawaz said was - "Tell India to stop the Kargil operation - and get to the negotiating table - else this could spiral into a nuclear war." Just before this - Sartaz Aziz demanded a meeting with Jaswant Singh which lasted all of 5 minutes, the crux was - Pakistan told India to stop Kargil offensive and India refused. Pakistan's problem in Kargil was -

a. It all along claimed that these were "freedom fighters" when in reality they were Army Regulars.

b. India used their Air Force and Pakistan because it claimed these were not Army regulars could not provide any Air Support.

c. India pounded them with Bofors - Pakistan had not taken the power of these guns into account. India lifted sanctions on Bofors to imports the necessary bullets.

d. Pakistan was looking at a face-saving exit. So while Nawaz agreed with Clinton to evacuate from the Kargil heights - India continued to shoot the Pakistanis even when they were on their way down. This probably was the catalyst for the coup which followed. The Pakistani soldiers were left high and dry.

e. Lastly, I remember quite clearly that Nawaz inserted one line to the Clinton joint statement which stated that Bill Clinton would take a "personal interest" in resolving the Kashmir dispute. In those days the Pakistanis were showing this as some form of victory - that no American President has vowed to take a "personal interest" in Kashmir. In reality - it was America pretty much saying - "Err, sorry - The United States can't help you." Surely, someone can dig up that joint statement.

And don't talk about using nukes as if it is some form of joke. Generations continue to suffer in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Responsible states should not engage in nuclear brinksmanship.

All said and done - I still fear that a stray nuke would probably emanate from North Korea - that guy there is a complete nutjob - feed his uncle to hungry dogs and what not. Pakistan probably has a pretty secure grasp on its nukes - but it would like the world to believe that - "hey - that nuke can fall into the wrong hands here - then all bets are off." It is a very risky bluff and while it may work every now and then - at some point, it might backfire royally. It is one thing to blackmail Clinton - imagine this same conversation with Cheney - he would probably have marched in troops into Pakistan.



Let me just quote you Allama Iqbal -

Yunan-o-misr-o-roma, sab mit gaye jahan se
Ab tak magar hai baqi, nam-o-nishan hamara

Kuch bat hai keh hasti, mitati nahin hamari
Sadiyon raha hai dushman, daur-e-zaman hamara

Bro You Nailed it...
 
.
A Picture Speaks


Na na... Munna.. Chhote Baache hi cartoon Dekhte hai... Cartoon Se Kya hoga Bhala.. beta...Hum Asli Picture Dikha Dete Hai....

Ps7-81.JPG


Aadha Mulk gaya....90000... kaidi....Bhai..logo last time to ye hua... Bina Nukes.. k.. Ab Kya Chahte to yaar ??

.


Bhai loog 1962 yaad aaya ?? ub woh zamana nahe haina ? ub phir 1971 b nahi hey.. filhaal pichlay 14 saal say tumharay hukmaran he tumko ***** bana rahay hain nothing erlse more... na kuch ukhaar sakay hain Pakistan ka ... 26/11 kay baad tum jesay tatuoon ko aur mazeed ****** banatay rahay hain Surgical Strikes ka rolla daal daal kar aur tum jesay ...... chalanagy maartay rahay hain... at the end woh filhaal apni *** may he war gaye hey sare surgical strikes LOL

hoon aram e ?
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom