What's new

Journalist Saleem Shahzad Abducted and found dead.

"The Holy Prophet said: The greatest jihad is to speak the word of truth to a tyrant." (Mishkat)

Saleem Shazad is Shaheed inshallah. May his wife and kids have courage to bear this loss.

He went beyond the call of duty to bring out the truth for the people and put his life in danger for it.
 
.
Saleem Shahzad peddled fables in much of his reports. Still, sad to see him die like this.
 
. .
Missing Pakistan journalist Saleem Shahzad found dead near Islamabad

A prominent Pakistani journalist who investigated links between the military and al-Qaida has been found dead, triggering angry accusations against the powerful Inter-Services Intelligence spy agency.

Saleem Shahzad, Pakistan correspondent for a news service based in Hong Kong, disappeared on his way to a television interview in Islamabad on Sunday evening. On Tuesday ,police said they found his body on a canal bank in Mandi Bahauddin, 80 miles south-east of the capital.

Shahzad's abandoned car was found 25 miles away. Television images of his body showed heavy bruising to his face. Media reports said he had a serious trauma wound to the stomach.

Human Rights Watch had already raised the alarm over the disappearance of the 40-year-old father of three, citing a "reliable interlocutor" who said he had been abducted by ISI.

"This killing bears all the hallmarks of previous killings perpetrated by Pakistani intelligence agencies," said a senior researcher for Human Rights Watch in south Asia, Ali Dayan Hasan. He called for a "transparent investigation and court proceedings".

Other journalists reacted angrily, directly accusing ISI of responsibility on television and social media. "Any journalist here who doesn't believe that it's our intelligence agencies?" tweeted Mohammed Hanif, a bestselling author.

"We want an answer. We need an answer. We deserve an answer," said talk-show host Quatrina Husain.

A senior ISI official told the Associated Press that allegations of the agency's involvement were absurd.

Shahzad, who worked for the online service Asia Times Online and the Italian news agency Adnkronos, vanished two days after publishing a story alleging Pakistan military officials had been in secret negotiations with al-Qaida.

The story claimed the terrorist group had attacked the Mehran naval base in Karachi on 22 May after talks with the military to release two naval officials accused of militant links broke down.

The naval base assault was a humiliation for the Pakistani army, which battled for 17 hours against at least four heavily armed men who blew up two US-built surveillance planes and killed 10 soldiers. On Tuesday, Pakistani media reported that military intelligence had picked up a retired navy commando and his brother in Lahore in connection with the raid.

The raid came after unprecedented criticism of the army for the US raid that killed Osama bin Laden, and WikiLeaks disclosures that showed army complicity with the CIA drone programme.

Shahzad was abducted from central Islamabad on Sunday as he travelled to the studios of Dunya television to discuss his report on the naval base attack. His wife alerted human rights groups.

He had previously warned of threats to his life from ISI, according to Human Rights Watch. Last October, after he was summoned to ISI headquarters to explain a story, he sent an email to be released in the event of his death, Hasan said.

The email recounted a meeting with two senior ISI personnel who questioned him over a story about Mullah Brader, a Taliban commander captured in Pakistan with American help months earlier.

The two ISI officials named in the article, Rear Admiral Adnan Nazir and Commodore Khalid Pervaiz, were naval officers. Shahzad claimed that Nazir warned the journalist that he might find himself on a "terrorist hitlist". "If I find your name in the list, I will certainly let you know," he reportedly said.

Last week, Pervaiz was made commander of the Karachi naval base that was attacked.

"We believed [Shahzad's] claim that he was being threatened by the ISI was credible and any investigation into his murder has to factor this in," said Hasan.

As a reporter, Shahzad was known for delving deep into the murky underworld of Islamist militancy. He had interviewed some of the most notorious leaders, including Sirajuddin Haqqani, a major player in the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan, and Ilyas Kashmiri, a Pakistani militant who works for al-Qaida.

He had just published a book called Inside Al-Qaeda and the Taliban: Beyond Bin Laden and 9/11.

Zaffar Abbas, editor of Dawn, Pakistan's most respected paper, paid tribute to Shahzad as "a fine reporter, one of a breed of Pakistani journalists who really believe in investigative journalism". In the light of the death, he is was looking at scaling back his own paper's coverage.

"I am seriously considering the entire process of reporting, and to what extent I can put my own team at risk. It is becoming increasingly dangerous for people to openly report, whether militants or security agencies are involved."

Pakistan's prime minister, Yousaf Raza Gilani, expressed his "deep grief and sorrow" over Shahzad's death and ordered an inquiry, saying that "the culprits would be brought to book at every cost".

Hopes for any inquiry, however, were low. Although the ISI technically reports to Gilani, in reality it is controlled by the army chief, General Ashfaq Kayani. Although accused of numerous human rights abuses over the years, serving ISI officials have never been prosecuted.

Cricketer turned politician Imran Khan termed Shahzad's death a "heinous crime" but avoided mention of the ISI, instead blaming the "servile policies [of] a corrupt and inept government".

Pakistan is the world's most dangerous country for journalists, according to Reporters without Borders, which says that 16 journalists have been killed in the past 14 months. Some of the worst excesses occurred in western province of Balochistan.

Last September Umar Cheema, another investigative reporter, was abducted from Islamabad for six hours and tortured before being released. He said he suspected that his kidnappers belonged to the ISI.

Shahzad was buried in an unmarked grave on Monday, after local police failed to identify his body. His remains were exhumed on Tuesday on orders from President Asif Ali Zardari's office. An autopsy is due.

Missing Pakistan journalist Saleem Shahzad found dead near Islamabad | World news | The Guardian
 
.
Daily Times

EDITORIAL: Saleem Shahzad: the price of truth

The body of Syed Saleem Shahzad, one of Pakistan’s best investigative journalists, was found yesterday from Mandi Bahauddin. Mr Shahzad was Pakistan bureau chief of Asia Times Online. He went missing on May 29, 2011 from Islamabad when he was on his way to a local television channel to participate in a talk show but he never made it. Reports suggest that he disappeared between 5:30-6:00 pm from a high security area in Islamabad. According to Human Rights Watch (HRW), Mr Shahzad had voiced his concerns that a sensitive intelligence agency could harm him. In an interview with TIME magazine, HRW’s Ali Dayan Hasan said: “To date, no intelligence personnel have been held accountable for frequently perpetrated abuses against journalists. Tolerance for these practices has to end, now.” Saleem Shahzad’s last story for Asia Times Online revealed how al Qaeda had penetrated the Pakistan Navy. The attack on PNS Mehran took place “after talks failed between the Navy and al Qaeda over the release of naval officials arrested on suspicion of al Qaeda links,” wrote Mr Shahzad in his report on May 27. This was the first part of his report but he was abducted before the second part could be published.

It is a sad day, nay black day, for journalism in Pakistan that a journalist was picked up from the capital and his tortured body dumped in another town while the perpetrators of this gory crime roam free. This is not the first time that a journalist has lost his life for honest reporting. In the past we have been witness to the deaths of many brave journalists in Pakistan, especially in Balochistan, FATA and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. It is not without reason that Pakistan has been dubbed as the most dangerous place for journalists by Reporters without Borders. Journalists in Pakistan are between a rock and a hard place: they face threats both from the militants and our intelligence agencies. When journalists write or speak against terrorists, they receive threats. When they expose our military’s links with terrorists, they are harassed. Threats, harassment, abduction and even murder is what journalists in Pakistan are victims of all too frequently.

Syed Saleem Shahzad’s brutal murder seems like a warning to Pakistan’s journalist community that if they continue to report honestly, they can be killed. If the people of Pakistan, especially the media community, does not wake up and speak out against such brutalities, every sane voice in the country will die a silent death. If we remain quiet, this will be our own self-inflicted Holocaust. Prime Minister Gilani has ordered an inquiry into Mr Shahzad’s murder. The question is, will this be like any other inquiry that takes place here, with no results? We must urge the government to probe into this matter and make the results of the investigation public.

This should also serve as an eye-opener for those who have been apologising for the military and the Taliban alike. How many more innocents have to die before we realise that our country is a war zone where no one is safe from either our so-called saviours or the terrorists. Mr Shahzad and many others like him paid the price for reporting the truth. We must stop blaming external forces for what we are facing right now. In a country where terrorists, murderers, rapists and criminals roam free, deaths of innocents are all but inevitable. How many more people will have to sacrifice their lives before we finally call a spade a spade? Pakistan is in a deep mess right now and it is all our own doing. Let’s wake up to this reality before our soil turns completely red (if it has not already) with the blood of our citizens. RIP Saleem Shahzad; we cannot condemn or mourn your death adequately in words. Our only salvation now lies in bringing Mr Shahzad’s murderers to book
 
.
Pakistan Journalist Vanishes: Is the ISI Involved ?
May 31, 2011

By Omar Waraich

Fears are growing for the safety of a well-known Pakistani journalist who has been missing for 39 hours now and, according to an international advocacy group, is believed to be in the custody of Pakistan’s controversial Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Human Rights Watch declared that Syed Saleem Shahzad, a reporter working for the Hong Kong–based Asia Times Online and Adnkronos International, the Italian news agency, could be subject to mistreatment and even torture while in custody.


UPDATE: Pakistan’s main news channels are reporting that Shahzad’s dead body has been found. One news channel broadcast what appeared to be a black and white image of Shahzad’s face. There were visible signs of torture..

While the ISI was said to have bristled at previous reports by Shahzad, his disappearance happened two days after he wrote a story for Asia Times Online that said that al-Qaeda had attacked a naval base in the port city of Karachi on May 22 after talks had broken down between the Pakistan navy and the global terrorist organization. In his report, Shahzad claimed that al-Qaeda had carried out the attack in retaliation for the arrest of naval officials suspected of links with the terrorist group. (See pictures of the Taliban’s war in Pakistan.)

The 17-hour attack on the Karachi naval base by at least four people led to the destruction of two Lockheed Martin P-3C Orion aircraft that had been enhanced with counterterrorism capabilities. An investigation is currently under way. At the time of the attack, former military officers and analysts speculated that it could not have been mounted without some help from the inside.

On Monday, Pakistani intelligence officials told journalists that they had picked up Kamran Ahmed Malik, a former navy commando, in Lahore on Friday. Malik and his brother have been detained in connection with the investigation. While Malik has not been formally charged, it is widely reported that he is being held for questioning about his links to both the terrorists and former colleagues inside the navy.

Shahzad, the missing journalist, is believed to have been abducted by intelligence agents from the well-heeled F-6/2 area of Islamabad around 5:45 p.m. At the time, he was on his way to the studios of Pakistan’s Dunya News channel to discuss the contents of his latest report about the naval-base attack. He had driven there from his house in central Islamabad’s leafy F-8/4 neighborhood, some 4 km away. At a quarter to 6, Shahzad had responded to a call from a producer at Dunya News and said he was on his way, says Nasim Zehra, director of current affairs at the channel. No one has heard from him since. TIME’s request for comment from the military was not answered. (See why Osama bin Laden’s death should finish al-Qaeda.)

The following morning, Ali Dayan Hasan, a senior researcher at Human Rights Watch, received a call from Shahzad’s wife. “He had told her that I was one of the people that should be called in case anything happens to him,” says Hasan. “He had feared for sometime that something like this would happen to him.” Later, Human Rights Watch says it was able to establish that Shahzad was being held by the ISI. “We were informed through reliable interlocutors that he was detained by the ISI,” says Hasan. Those interlocutors, he adds, had received direct confirmation from the agency that it was detaining Shahzad. In any case, Hasan says, “in a high-security zone like Islamabad, it is only the ISI that can effect the disappearance of man and his car without a trace.”

Human Rights Watch was also told that Shahzad was supposed to return home on Monday night. “The relevant people were informed that his telephone would be switched on first, enabling him to communicate with his family,” says Hasan. “They were told that he would return home soon after.” But by 1 a.m. on Tuesday morning, Shahzad had still not been heard from. At that point, Hasan recalled that Shahzad had sent him an e-mail on Oct. 18, 2010, that was to be released in the event of his disappearance. At the time, says Hasan, he was “fairly sure that sooner or later something was going to happen.” Human Rights Watch says it has made repeated attempts to contact Pakistan’s government and establish Shahzad’s whereabouts, but has received no response.

On Oct. 17, Shahzad had been summoned to the ISI’s headquarters to discuss the contents of an article published the day before with two officials from the agency’s media wing. That report, published in Asia Times Online, alleged that Pakistan had quietly released Afghan Taliban commander Mullah Baradar, Mullah Omar’s deputy, to take part in talks through the Pakistan army. According to the e-mail, labeled “For future reference” and seen by TIME, one of the officials said the following words to Shahzad: “I must give you a favor. We have recently arrested a terrorist and recovered a lot of data, diaries and other material during the interrogation. The terrorist had a list with him. If I find your name in the list, I will certainly let you know.” Incidentally, the two ISI officials present at the meeting, Rear Admiral Adnan Nawaz and Commodore Khalid Pervaiz, are both from the navy. Pervaiz has just been appointed the new commander of the Karachi naval base that was attacked.

Hasan of Human Rights Watch says that statement can be read as a threat. “The tone and the manner in which it was issued did constitute a threat,” he says. “Shahzad described it to me.” The rest of the meeting, as Shahzad described it in the e-mail, was held in “an extremely polite and friendly atmosphere,” but no words were minced. In the e-mail, the ISI official was said to have asked for the source of his story. Shahzad writes that he would not name the source, but said he had been told the information by an intelligence official and later confirmed the story from “the most credible Taliban source.” According to Shahzad’s account, he was asked to “write a denial of the story” but “refused to comply with the [ISI] demand.”

Many of Shahzad’s media colleagues speculate that the ISI is holding him to extract the identities of his sources. “It is very difficult to say what they want from him,” says Hasan. “But when the ISI picks up journalists in this manner, they are often subjected to mistreatment and torture. The longer he stays in their custody, the greater the likelihood is that he will be tortured.”

Last September, Umar Cheema, an investigative reporter for the News, an influential Pakistani daily, was kidnapped, blindfolded, stripped naked, had his head and eyebrows shaved, beaten, filmed in humiliating positions and dumped on the side of the road six hours later. “If you can’t avoid rape,” one of his interrogators jeered during the ordeal, “enjoy it.” The perpetrators were never found, but when asked about his suspicions, Cheema told the New York Times: “I have suspicions and every journalist has suspicions that all fingers point to the ISI.”

The disappearance of Shahzad is a reminder of the multiple hazards faced by journalists working in Pakistan. In January, Wali Khan Babar, a respected reporter for Geo News, was gunned down in Karachi. Last month reporter Abdullah Bhittani cheated death after being shot three times in Rawalpindi, while a radio station in the northwest town of Charsadda was bombed. Bhittani has recovered, but with 10 slain journalists last year, the Newseum in Washington, D.C. called Pakistan “the deadliest country in the world for journalists.” Reporters Without Borders ranked it 151 out of 178 countries when it comes to press freedom.

The principal threats, human-rights campaigners say, come from military-intelligence agencies and Islamist militants. “As a consequence, it is becoming difficult for journalists to perform their basic professional duties in the context of a war between the Pakistani state and the militants,” Hasan says. “Both parties target journalists, arbitrarily and with brutality.” Human Rights Watch has called on Pakistan’s government to locate Shahzad, return him safely to his home and hold those who held him “illegally” accountable. “To date, no intelligence personnel have been held accountable for frequently perpetrated abuses against journalists,” laments Hasan. “Tolerance for these practices has to end, now.”

Source: Time
 
.
Here is an email he sent earlier to one of his friends from HRW regarding a meeting that he had.



Saleem Shahzad dead: another one bites the dust (updated below with email from Shahzad to Human Rights Watch) | Asian Correspondent

Absolutely no use trying to convince some here, probably will be written off as another attempt to defame the ISI even if it was written by a person who is now dead. Veracity of the email will be questioned & if proven true then the journalist obviously tortured & killed himself to defame the ISI. The alternative, whoever improbable will be preferred to reading the writing on the wall.

Cricketer turned politician Imran Khan termed Shahzad's death a "heinous crime" but avoided mention of the ISI, instead blaming the "servile policies [of] a corrupt and inept government".

Yeah, can't blame his meal ticket, far easier to blame the Americans. (The Pakistani government is servile also to its military but i doubt very much that is what Imran Khan is alluding to.)
 
.
Cricketer turned politician Imran Khan termed Shahzad's death a "heinous crime" but avoided mention of the ISI, instead blaming the "servile policies [of] a corrupt and inept government".
Yeah, can't blame his meal ticket, far easier to blame the Americans. (The Pakistani government is servile also to its military but i doubt very much that is what Imran Khan is alluding to.)
Everybody has the fear for his life. Imran is no different.

Reports: Pakistan Journalist Dead after Mysterious Disappearance - TIME


Last September, Umar Cheema, an investigative reporter for The News, an influential Pakistani daily, was kidnapped, blindfolded, stripped naked, had his head and eyebrows shaved, beaten, filmed in humiliating positions, and dumped on the side of the road six hours later.

"If you can't avoid rape," one of his interrogators jeered during the ordeal, "enjoy it." :eek:

The perpetrators were never found, but when asked about his suspicions, Cheema told the New York Times: "I have suspicions and every journalist has suspicions that all fingers point to the ISI."
 
.
isi may be involved because they are damn good to kill their own peoples.....and i am victim of it
 
. .
do you want me to be a victim again ....... my bones are not that strong to bear that again

but whatever the case i will keep loving my force but it would be on condition if they stop killing their own people stop bowing their head down in front of f**** america

This is sort of alarming. Are you suggesting that the ISI interrogated you?
 
.
do you want me to be a victim again ....... my bones are not that strong to bear that again

so you gave up and decided not to speak up against the tyrants in our country ,this explains the terror inside general pakistanis they are scared to come out. How can any one un earth the truth ever , the only solution seems over power legally such institutes appoint civilians or those from federal forces to head rouge organisations like isi.
 
.
This is sort of alarming. Are you suggesting that the ISI interrogated you?

Exactly..thats what even i was thinking...but then again if he has commited something against the state [which i dont think so] then they have all the rights to interrogate but if they did it to shut him up..then its plain scary and outrageous. :frown:
 
.
so you gave up and decided not to speak up against the tyrants in our country ,this explains the terror inside general pakistanis they are scared to come out. How can any one un earth the truth ever , the only solution seems over power legally such institutes appoint civilians or those from federal forces to head rouge organisations like isi.

I don't understand how you can proclaim that the ISI is rouge institution. Do you have any insiders or do you work for the ISI? ISI has done all it can, it is trying its best to help protect Pakistan. All the Pakistani security institutions are doing there best to protect the civilians and keyboard warriors like you. Heck if they weren’t around you'd be living under Taliban rule. For example they interrogate people to prevent any more maniacs from doing anything extreme. Yes they might have flaws in their system but at least they are trying... :coffee:
 
.
I don't understand how you can proclaim that the ISI is rouge institution. Do you have any insiders or do you work for the ISI? ISI has done all it can, it is trying its best to help protect Pakistan. All the Pakistani security institutions are doing there best to protect the civilians and keyboard warriors like you. Heck if they weren’t around you'd be living under Taliban rule. For example they interrogate people to prevent any more maniacs from doing anything extreme. Yes they might have flaws in their system but at least they are trying... :coffee:

So living under shariat law is a threat? Talibaan, the real mujahideen and not TTP etc., simply fought to enforce shariat in Afghanistan after they defeated USSR, nothing wrong with that at all.

On the other hand those 'alleged' talibaan or Islamists who carry out suicide/remote bomb attacks especially on non combatants/non invading forces and innocent civilians are true terrorists. Mixing them or considering them both to be the same is extremely incorrect! In simplest terms Talibaan are NOT terrorists but terrorists pose as Talibaan to achieve sinister gains for international powers. For ex. BLA is being funded, trained and equipped by RAW to destabilize Pakistan & TTP is being funded, trained and equipped by CIA for the same purpose.

My anger on the military and ISI is targetted at their eerie and continued silence on matters of national security and even more so at their inaction against invading forces that murder Pakistanis without discrimination while at the same time the invading and enemy forced call most of us Pakistanis 'terrorists'.....why the military and ISI continues to accept this is beyond me.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom