Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Friend,https://defence-blog.com/news/china...ng-unmanned-aerial-system-for-export.html/amp
China delivered 100th Wing Loong unmanned aerial system for export
Some can only admire Chinese export product quantity and amount of users....
Another 100 wing loong to go... Total 200 will need to be delivered. And this is wing loong series. Not including CH-4/5 sales...
Yes yes, buyer not happy but somehow Iraq and Egypt are both repeated customers with the more order
Maybe both countries are stupid according to some sourgraped
Egypt asked for improvements and are buying a new model that is designed to fix issues Egypt had with drone.https://defence-blog.com/news/china...ng-unmanned-aerial-system-for-export.html/amp
China delivered 100th Wing Loong unmanned aerial system for export
Some can only admire Chinese export product quantity and amount of users....
Another 100 wing loong to go... Total 200 will need to be delivered. And this is wing loong series. Not including CH-4/5 sales...
Yes yes, buyer not happy but somehow Iraq and Egypt are both repeated customers with the more order
Maybe both countries are stupid according to some sourgraped
Not a way to compare. How far was the Chinese drone and how far was the Turkish drone from target???Look at these chinese trolls
this is chinese drone image quality
and this is turkish drone image quality
my phone camera records better videos than chinese drones lol
Egypt asked for improvements and are buying a new model that is designed to fix issues Egypt had with drone.
Egypt is extremely secretive when it comes to weapons from China/Russia so don't think they would release such info.Is there any press release from the provider against the complaints and how to solve'em permanently?
I am totally ok if someone can really back up their words with real article and true facts from well written article about problem with Chinese UCAV but facts is , most of the accusation are from shabby Twitter or Facebook post with little reliability and virtually no explanation for root cost. I am sure you all are aware of the extreme biased anti China campaign by the west by spreading misinfo.Friend,
China have demonstrated the capability to develop high-tech drones, and nobody is disputing this fact. However, China does not face much competition in this market either; some countries are reluctant to export their high-tech drones to other countries which are reportedly better than Chinese options. American high-tech drones are renowned for their capabilities worldwide for instance, but not approved for export to other countries yet. Pakistan Army was also interested in buying MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper drones [with hard cash] but was refused, therefore, Pakistan Army settled for Chinese options.
No need to take these matters at heart; different customers have different tastes. Some of your customers might be satisfied with your products but other desire better. Some of the countries in the Middle East have developed a taste for purely high-end gear, and American companies have gone extra mile to cater to their needs in its dealings.
Another reality is that a product might have fantastic build-quality but might not sell well. I bear witness to this fact at personal capacity because I have been a part of the Pakistani business community for a while.
Turkey is a member of NATO, and is known to develop NATO-standard products on average.
Chill, and drink a coke.
Somehow you can ignore the fact, Egypt and Iraq are repeat customers. If they are so unhappy about Chinese UCAV used in actual combat. Why would the buy back from the same country? Looks more like a slap for those who bad mouth China UCAV. This is basic common sense.The Chinese team uses total number of costumers as a proof to prove the quality of their drones. No matter how wierd this logic is. On the other hand, As reliable sources prove that many ME countries using Chinese drones voice complaints about quality and bad experience. Link capability, interoperability, electro-optic payload, service ceiling performance are the main issues. Most probably, Egypt also suffers some of those issues regarding Chinese sytems.
Somehow you can ignore the fact, Egypt and Iraq are repeat customers. If they are so unhappy about Chinese UCAV used in actual combat. Why would the buy back from the same country? Looks more like a slap for those who bad mouth China UCAV. This is basic common sense.
Let me say again. So far your source of accusation about complaint of Chinese UCAV are Facebook post and shabby post with little explanation and u are so quick to jump on the bandwagon to start your agenda.
Jordan decommission Chinese UCAV has nothing to do with quality but politic as previous poster has already made the post that US provided generous USD 1 billion aid to ask for US UCAV and drop Chinese UCAV.
Talking about lack of competition is also BS. Why your dear Tukrmenistan, kazhastan, Uzberkistan go for Chinese UCAV since they have closed ties with Turkey? China UCAV beats you soundly fair and square and is selected by them.
I am totally ok if someone can really back up their words with real article and true facts from well written article about problem with Chinese UCAV but facts is , most of the accusation are from shabby Twitter or Facebook post with little reliability and virtually no explanation for root cost. I am sure you all are aware of the extreme biased anti China campaign by the west by spreading misinfo.
Still remember the heated argument about PA selection of next gen MBT? Many members are so negative about VT-4 tank and near in stage of calling it a junk based on false Facebook bogus source. Many think it will loses the competition against T-84 oplot. End up what? All those slayers eat the humble pie when well informed sources say VT-4 won the trial test and is selected as next MBT.
I think I do not need to elaborate further here.
Somehow you can ignore the fact, Egypt and Iraq are repeat customers. If they are so unhappy about Chinese UCAV used in actual combat. Why would the buy back from the same country? Looks more like a slap for those who bad mouth China UCAV. This is basic common sense.
Let me say again. So far your source of accusation about complaint of Chinese UCAV are Facebook post and shabby post with little explanation and u are so quick to jump on the bandwagon to start your agenda.
Jordan decommission Chinese UCAV has nothing to do with quality but politic as previous poster has already made the post that US provided generous USD 1 billion aid to ask for US UCAV and drop Chinese UCAV.
Talking about lack of competition is also BS. Why your dear Tukrmenistan, kazhastan, Uzberkistan go for Chinese UCAV since they have closed ties with Turkey? China UCAV beats you soundly fair and square and is selected by them.
Friend,
China have demonstrated the capability to develop high-tech drones, and nobody is disputing this fact. However, China does not face much competition in this market either; some countries are reluctant to export their high-tech drones to other countries which are reportedly better than Chinese options. American high-tech drones are renowned for their capabilities worldwide for instance, but not approved for export to other countries yet. Pakistan Army was also interested in buying MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper drones [with hard cash] but was refused, therefore, Pakistan Army settled for Chinese options.
No need to take these matters at heart; different customers have different tastes. Some of your customers might be satisfied with your products but other desire better. Some of the countries in the Middle East have developed a taste for purely high-end gear, and American companies have gone extra mile to cater to their needs in its dealings.
Another reality is that a product might have fantastic build-quality but might not sell well. I bear witness to this fact at personal capacity because I have been a part of the Pakistani business community for a while.
Turkey is a member of NATO, and is known to develop NATO-standard products on average.
Chill, and drink a coke.
Actually due to quick de-industrialization, USA is losing technical know-how and their militarily is increasingly relying on Chinese supply chain