What's new

Joe Biden raised issue of Canadian Sikh’s death with Indian leader Narendra Modi

The last paragraph in thist article is key. Canada has secret recordings between Indian officials and Indian diplomats that prove India's involvement​

Joe Biden raised issue of Canadian Sikh’s death with Indian leader Narendra Modi​

White House says targeting dissidents in other countries ‘absolutely unacceptable’



US president Joe Biden and other western leaders expressed concern to Narendra Modi, India’s prime minister, about Canadian claims that New Delhi was involved in the murder of a Sikh separatist in Canada when they met the Indian leader at the G20 this month.Three people familiar with the discussions at the G20 summit said several members of the Five Eyes — an intelligence-sharing network that includes the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand — raised the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar with Modi. One said Biden felt it was important to raise the issue directly with his Indian counterpart.

The White House declined to comment on whether Biden had raised the issue with Modi at the G20.The leaders intervened at the G20 summit after Canada urged its allies to raise the case directly with Modi, said two people familiar with the situation, who added Ottawa asked them to mention the claims in private.In a stunning move on Monday, Justin Trudeau, Canada’s prime minister, said there were “credible allegations” that Indian government “agents” were behind the murder of Nijjar, who was killed in Surrey, a suburb of Vancouver, in June.

The explosive claim, which New Delhi has dismissed as “absurd”, immediately cratered Canada-India relations. India on Thursday stopped issuing visas to Canadian citizens and ordered Ottawa to reduce its diplomatic presence in the country. Earlier on Thursday, the Canadian foreign ministry said it was adjusting its staff levels at missions in India over concerns about the safety of its diplomats.

The crisis has sparked questions about how Canada’s allies have handled the case, particularly given the intense efforts the Biden administration has made to enhance relations with India in an effort to create a counterweight to China. The US president hosted Modi for a high-profile state visit over the summer.US officials have strenuously denied that Washington was quiet on the issue to avoid antagonising India.

The White House said it was “deeply concerned” after Trudeau made the claims. One person familiar with the thinking inside the administration said Washington concluded it would have been inappropriate to weigh in publicly before the announcement because of possible legal implications for the Canadian investigation.US national security adviser Jake Sullivan on Thursday dismissed suggestions that Washington’s desire to bolster ties with New Delhi would constrain its ability to voice concerns about the allegations.

He said the administration took the allegations “seriously” and would defend US principles regardless of the country involved. He said the US was consulting closely with Canada. “We are in constant contact with our Canadian counterparts,” said Sullivan, adding that the US had also been “in touch” with India’s government.

Adrienne Watson, the White House National Security Council spokesperson, said “targeting dissidents in other countries is absolutely unacceptable and we will keep taking steps to push back on this practice”.Speaking to reporters in New York on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly on Wednesday, Australia’s foreign minister Penny Wong said Canberra had “raised our concerns” with New Delhi without giving details.

Canada’s public broadcaster on Thursday reported, citing federal government sources, that intelligence obtained by the Canadian government relating to Nijjar’s killing included communications involving Indian officials and Indian diplomats that were based in Canada.Trudeau’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
 
Last edited:
.
MAKE THEM PUBLIC
WHY WOULD INDIA CALL FOR OPEN DISPLAY OF THE EVIDENCE IF INDIA HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT>
WHY DOES INDIA INSIST CANADA SHOW "CREDITABLE EVIDENCE"

There is speculation and gossip amongst the Khalistani's who have an inordinate power over Turdo and the Liberal party which once had 5 Khalistani ministers in government

There is no evidence
 
.
Canada has secret recordings. They will make them public at a time of their choosing. At the moment there is an ongoing murder investigation.
 
.
Does this now mean the Indian R&AW and other intelligence officials running around in Pakistan's neighboring countries are a fair target?

What is the point of taking their pictures and noting the addresses they visit, their preferred foods, drinks, cologne brands etc?
 
. . .
There is International Court of Justice for them to show up to, if they have anything substantial. Otherwise these are all brain farts.
Dont worry, it will all come out. Just like Turkey did a slow drip of the khashoggi murder tapes.
 
. . . .
MAKE THEM PUBLIC
WHY WOULD INDIA CALL FOR OPEN DISPLAY OF THE EVIDENCE IF INDIA HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT>
WHY DOES INDIA INSIST CANADA SHOW "CREDITABLE EVIDENCE"

There is speculation and gossip amongst the Khalistani's who have an inordinate power over Turdo and the Liberal party which once had 5 Khalistani ministers in government

There is no evidence
Because if they made it public it would show the US giving Canada the intelligence.

Pannun needs to get buried tomorrow and we need to ask them what theyre going to do about it
 
.
So everywhere it is 'Trust me Bro'

Trust me Bro, all know of the credible allegation and told off Modi

Trust me bro, we got all the evidence

:lol:
 
.
It's still suspicion.

There's no evidence that India is involved.

If Canada intel know that Sikhs will be killed, then why don't protect him?

Now the Sikhs is dead, then suddenly Canada intel claims to know???
 
. .
It's still suspicion.

There's no evidence that India is involved.

If Canada intel know that Sikhs will be killed, then why don't protect him?

Now the Sikhs is dead, then suddenly Canada intel claims to know???
Intelligence agencies are tracking hundreds if not thousands of people all the time. They cannot secure everyone.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom