What's new

JL-3 Test

Mr F-22Raptor thinks having bases around the world means it can project power everywhere. Certainly not in the Chinese seas where the US Navy will be completely overwhelmed by the Chinese Navy. US will not deploy all the assets in the Pacific just to challenge China because that will give plenty of opportunities for other countries to fill in the gap left behind by the US.

I am willing to bet that Trump in his second term will try to deploy all the naval assets of the USN in Asia-Pacific.

Since the hatred and belligerence against China from his admin will be running out of control by then.

They will not think rationally how the US needs to balance the world with her projecting power, but keep thinking how to take down China at any cost.
 
.
I am willing to bet that Trump in his second term will try to deploy all the naval assets of the USN in Asia-Pacific.

Since the hatred and belligerence against China from his admin will be running out of control by then.

They will not think rationally how the US needs to balance the world with her projecting power, but keep thinking to take down China at any cost.
He has been unable to control North Korea, how will he control China ? USA is no more than a barking dog now, its international status as a super power has eroded beyond repair. Its moral standing in the world is zero. Every dog has his day, US's has arrived earlier than expected.
 
.
The Trident II D5 was a design done by nearly 40 years ago.

The JL-3 was designed with much more advanced high techs in the 21st century, including the much more powerful solid-fuel propellant than the NEPE-75.

We are not Russia or France, our budget and talent pool are not constrained.



By 2025, you will be running 14 Ohio SSBNs with 12 of these being over 30 years old, and the youngest two being 29 years old and 28 years old respectively.

And the leadship of the Columbia class will still be 5 years away from the deployment.

Does this sound great to you?


The Trident II D5 has been upgraded continuously over it’s lifespan. When it was developed is irrelevant. Apparently the article I posted went right over your head. It’s the most lethal SLBM in the world.
 
.
He has been unable to control North Korea, how will he control China ? USA is no more than a barking dog now, its international status as a super power has eroded beyond repair. Its moral standing in the world is zero. Every dog has his day, US's has arrived earlier than expected.

Because NK is not a challenger to the US hegemony, that's why Trump will just leave them alone just like how he left Iran alone even after they kept provoking the US by shooting down several drones.

Otherwise, you cannot explain why the trade war is also so detrimental to the US economy, yet they just insist to fight China till the end.

The Trident II D5 has been upgraded continuously over it’s lifespan. When it was developed is irrelevant. Apparently the article I posted went right over your head. It’s the most lethal SLBM in the world.

It doesn't matter, it is still an old design.

Just like the Arleigh Burke class, no matter how many times you keep upgrading them, it still cannot match the technological power of the newly designed Type 055.
 
. .
Trump has lost the trade war against China.


It will just be a temporary retreat from Trump, and he will surely come back after the re-election.

By 2020, he will surely not have too many big moves as he will be solely focus on the re-election, and the US economy could take a big hit from the escalation of the trade war, so he cannot afford it before the re-election time.
 
.
Because NK is not a challenger to the US hegemony, that's why Trump will just leave them alone just like how he left Iran alone even after they kept provoking the US by shooting down several drones.

Otherwise, you cannot explain why the trade war is also so detrimental to the US economy, yet they just insist to fight China till the end.



It doesn't matter, it is still an old design.

Just like the Arleigh Burke class, no matter how many times you keep upgrading them, it still cannot match the technological power of the newly designed Type 055.


Absolutely stupid. China has nothing that compares with the US Navy NIFC-CA battle network. Or the SM-3/SM-6 missiles. Or the Flight III Spy-6 radar that is 100 times more sensitive than the Spy-1 and will be backfit on the Flight IIs.

Not to mention SEWIP Block 2 and 3 EW upgrades.

1,000 mile Maritime Strike antiship Tomahawk

RAM Block II and ESSM Block II upgrades.

But the revolutionary gamechanger here is NIFCA-CA and the Burke’s ability to fully integrate with the force to achieve maximum effects. China has nothing that approaches this.
 
.
Absolutely stupid. China has nothing that compares with the US Navy NIFC-CA battle network. Or the SM-3/SM-6 missiles. Or the Flight III Spy-6 radar that is 100 times more sensitive than the Spy-1 and will be backfit on the Flight IIs.

Not to mention SEWIP Block 2 and 3 EW upgrades.

1,000 mile Maritime Strike antiship Tomahawk

RAM Block II and ESSM Block II upgrades.

But the revolutionary gamechanger here is NIFCA-CA and the Burke’s ability to fully integrate with the force to achieve maximum effects. China has nothing that approaches this.

Flight III still looks like Flight IIA with non-integrated mast.

And don’t talk about SM-3/SM-6, they are just utterly powerless to stop a swarm of hypersonic missiles.
 
.
Absolutely stupid. China has nothing that compares with the US Navy NIFC-CA battle network. Or the SM-3/SM-6 missiles. Or the Flight III Spy-6 radar that is 100 times more sensitive than the Spy-1 and will be backfit on the Flight IIs.

Not to mention SEWIP Block 2 and 3 EW upgrades.

1,000 mile Maritime Strike antiship Tomahawk

RAM Block II and ESSM Block II upgrades.

But the revolutionary gamechanger here is NIFCA-CA and the Burke’s ability to fully integrate with the force to achieve maximum effects. China has nothing that approaches this.
one volley of DF21s and DF41s from 3000 Km will send a Battle Carrier Group into the bottom of the sea. We will see who stops it.
 
.
Absolutely stupid. China has nothing that compares with the US Navy NIFC-CA battle network. Or the SM-3/SM-6 missiles. Or the Flight III Spy-6 radar that is 100 times more sensitive than the Spy-1 and will be backfit on the Flight IIs.

Not to mention SEWIP Block 2 and 3 EW upgrades.

1,000 mile Maritime Strike antiship Tomahawk

RAM Block II and ESSM Block II upgrades.

But the revolutionary gamechanger here is NIFCA-CA and the Burke’s ability to fully integrate with the force to achieve maximum effects. China has nothing that approaches this.
Lol... Ask HGV DF-17....
 
.
Some people are either naïve or just plain dumb enough to assume the US would be helpless in a nuclear attack.

When in reality, any nuclear first strike against the United States will result in massive nuclear Retaliation through the nuclear Triad

Enough said..
chinese are delusional folks, because they really believe war is a video they shoot while the opponents don’t.
Such people are dangerous! They don’t know of the consequences.
Even Mao Zedong calculated half of chinese population would die in a nuclear exchange.

 
.
chinese are delusional folks, because they really believe war is a video they shoot while the opponents don’t.
Such people are dangerous! They don’t know of the consequences.
Even Mao Zedong calculated half of chinese population would die in a nuclear exchange.

For US anyone who fights for his motherland is delusional. Only Americans have the right to throw nuclear bombs on other countries. No one else has a right to fire a bullet in self defence.

BTW Americans must not have forgotten the thrashing at the hands of Chinese and Vietnamese on Vietnam.
 
.
one volley of DF21s and DF41s from 3000 Km will send a Battle Carrier Group into the bottom of the sea. We will see who stops it.

DF-21D is big on hype but in a war, it won’t work. I’ve seen US experts discuss how vulnerable it is in a war and they already have multiple options to disable that missile. DF-21D is more of a propaganda weapon than an actually effective weapon in a real war.

Some people are either naïve or just plain dumb enough to assume the US would be helpless in a nuclear attack.

When in reality, any nuclear first strike against the United States will result in massive nuclear Retaliation through the nuclear Triad

Enough said..

An attack on the US is an attack on
NATO. It’s so stupid, not even the CCP will do it. The West has all the economic, financial, technological, military advantages and an unmatched global alliance network.
 
. .
When the PLA develops a battle network as advanced as the US Navy's NIFC-CA let me know.
Imagine being stupid enough to think that the country that has the most advanced telecommunications technology in the world doesn't have a battle network. Imagine being American.

Oh, and you never had a warship as powerful and fearsome as the 055 and never will. Your pathetic attempt resulted in this
160421-N-YE579-005-1.jpg

:omghaha:
Keep up the comedy. What else but comedy can anyone expect from a quasi-country like the US.
In the meantime, keep slobbering over those "new" weapons.
I'll keep slobbering, you keep vomiting Pentagonese acronyms. Since you're too stupid to figure it out yourself, I'll just tell you straight up that the Pentagon uses these acronyms to price gouge you, the retarded American taxpayer.

An attack on the US is an attack on
NATO.
I'm sure they'll send a strongly-worded letter.
DF-21D is big on hype but in a war, it won’t work.
Why don't you attack China if you're so confident that the AShBMs are just hype? I assure you, it will only get more difficult with each day that passes so no time like the present. China is rapidly building the most powerful navy on Earth, and you know full well what it intends to do with it.:butcher: So let's get this party started.

Or are you too chickenshit?:omghaha:

Oh, and the DF-21D is old news. Let me introduce you to its bigger, meaner cousin
Not to be outdone, this is what the DF-21D is up to these days
EFKtBqHUcAADEGP.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom