Pakistani shaheens
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2014
- Messages
- 1,710
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Lol yup just waiting for two years more to get my century.so, umm dude, you are 98 years old?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol yup just waiting for two years more to get my century.so, umm dude, you are 98 years old?
Looks like ziad hamid's worst nightmare's are becoming a reality.
whats with you and Lord Zaid?Looks like ziad hamid's worst nightmare's are becoming a reality.
dude, seriously?Lol yup just waiting for two years more to get my century.
Well I'm 19. Why r u asking anywaydude, seriously?
then why does your profile say "Male 98"Well I'm 19. Why r u asking anyway
Who judges who is a "true Pakistani" and who is not?
You mean 9th generation war.
I agree. Thank the Gods they left.Being an Indian, I am glad Jinnah created Pakistan otherwise his entire incompetent Muslim League was going to bring disaster for India. @LURKER what do you think.
the writers parents made a mistake...........
make fun of Zarvan all u want, but dont make fun of Lord ZaidThanks to @Zarvan and his numerous zaid hamid threads.
whut the?Well I wanted to be most senior person over here lol, so that people show respect
how come ?Looks like ziad hamid's worst nightmare's are becoming a reality.
I've thought about that, too. Maybe that would have been the best course.
I doubt that would have helped. But for Pakistan, Pakistan can indeed invite back the British, if it so wishes. The Queen could once again appoint a governor-general to exercise, as in Canada, the royal prerogative of calling bureaucrats to account. I can't see how that wouldn't help - if the Brits picked a lawyer and human rights activist rather than another Jinnah - but I'm not sure it would suffice, either.
The French DID go back to the decadent monarchy! And 150 years before that, the Brits reverted from a republic to constitutional monarchy and just about everyone was happier for it!
You're taking "great" as axiomatic, whereas the author severely calls that label into question.