GriffinsRule
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 3,394
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
There is no real indication that the wings are changing in any form in Block III. Its a wishlist item as it stands currently
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Friend, if you look at B version, that will be the basis for Blk III; wings are longer.There is no real indication that the wings are changing in any form in Block III. Its a wishlist item as it stands currently
wing span which is increases wing aeraFriend, if you look at B version, that will be the basis for Blk III; wings are longer.
per pac jf-17 promotional video all blocks can be upgraded to latest variantIt comes down to laying integration standards; everything is doable if you have standard interfacing defined.
Upgrading the older blocks is most likely not possible given the significant changes between I/II vs III.
per pac jf-17 promotional video all blocks can be upgraded to latest variant
Friend, if you look at B version, that will be the basis for Blk III; wings are longer.
wing span which is increases wing aera
Care to prove? As far as I've seen images in comparison, they are the same. Neither the "wings are longer", the span wider or anything else...
The dual bomb rack is not symmetrical. Any rationale for this? i don't think they planned it that way from the start but they had to fix an unexpected challenge and ended up with the current design. That is my reasing. Anyway with a better and more enlightened explanation?
If by symmetry you refer to the staggering; that is to allow better seperation clearance for the weapons from each other.The dual bomb rack is not symmetrical. Any rationale for this? i don't think they planned it that way from the start but they had to fix an unexpected challenge and ended up with the current design. That is my reasing. Anyway with a better and more enlightened explanation?
Thanks
The dual bomb rack is not symmetrical. Any rationale for this? i don't think they planned it that way from the start but they had to fix an unexpected challenge and ended up with the current design. That is my reasing. Anyway with a better and more enlightened explanation?
Thanks
thanks. I had searched for exactly these but couldn't find any. So it is not unusual.You will also notice now day in pics triple ejector racks on f-16 carrying just two gbu or bombs and not usual three with third inward rack empty before take off
Perhaps same reasons the inner rack can/ will eject only if drop tank are
Dropped to get clearance
View attachment 484812
View attachment 484813
View attachment 484814
The dual bomb rack is not symmetrical. Any rationale for this? i don't think they planned it that way from the start but they had to fix an unexpected challenge and ended up with the current design. That is my reasing. Anyway with a better and more enlightened explanation?
Thanks