What's new

JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 7]

What about block III
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1577562438219.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562438219.jpg
    55.5 KB · Views: 167
  • FB_IMG_1577562352724.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562352724.jpg
    20.4 KB · Views: 175
  • FB_IMG_1577562361788.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562361788.jpg
    15.9 KB · Views: 170
  • FB_IMG_1577562376907.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562376907.jpg
    35.5 KB · Views: 177
  • FB_IMG_1577562410050.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562410050.jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 174
  • FB_IMG_1577562306751.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562306751.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 179
  • FB_IMG_1577562344748.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562344748.jpg
    13.6 KB · Views: 173
  • FB_IMG_1577562415956.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562415956.jpg
    35.6 KB · Views: 176
  • FB_IMG_1577562433064.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562433064.jpg
    57.1 KB · Views: 170
This area also has now fuel cells ?? I think previous block single seater did not ??? I think [emoji848]

Adjustments.JPG
 
I was hoping the tail would look more like the one found on the JF17B.
 
Guys this is the first prototype

many changes will happen

Anyone remember the very ugly IFR on the test block I ?

they made it better in the operational units

my point is this is not the final configuration
 
Yes it does look cool, but now that I think of it, and people have said it before this aircraft will not have big changes. If the current tail works well then why change it.
But still I wonder why PAF has decided to go with 2 different types of tail configurations instead of sticking to one found in earlier Block I and II aircrafts. Or just upgrading the Block III tail found on JF17B
 
Last edited:
Can the MAWs, noticed in the recent pic of a Block III (behind the air intakes and the verticle fin), be retrofitted to the earlies Blocks?

80886239_2526361164308450_79846878006476800_n-jpg.596470


and do we know who flew this Block III, one of our boys or the CATIC big shot?
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom