What's new

JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 7]

.
DB55EF33-9725-428E-946E-E8FC4AF63B2E.jpeg
D163E671-A8F9-4DCB-A430-DFF804B381BE.jpeg
 
. . . . . . . . .
The size of JF17 is not big enough to have retractable refueling probe, unless we have this:
View attachment 468843
no sir almost same as F-16 and F-35 be@wanglaokan sir here it is sir
JF-17
  • Length: 14.93 m (49 ft)

F-16
  • Length: 49 ft 5 in (15.06 m)

F-35
  • Length: 50.5 ft (15.67 m)


may be internal valume of JF-17 is not enough to support retractable refueling probe @wanglaokan sir :undecided:
 
.
no sir almost same as F-16 and F-35 be@wanglaokan sir here it is sir
JF-17


    • Length: 14.93 m (49 ft)
F-16


    • Length: 49 ft 5 in (15.06 m)
F-35


    • Length: 50.5 ft (15.67 m)
may be internal valume of JF-17 is not enough to support retractable refueling probe @wanglaokan sir :undecided:
Retractable refueling probe is not a must, especially for a non-stealthy fighter.

image.jpeg

J10c had the same refueling probe.

But I admit it block pilot's starboard horizon in some extent.
 
.
no sir almost same as F-16 and F-35 be@wanglaokan sir here it is sir
JF-17


    • Length: 14.93 m (49 ft)

F-16


    • Length: 49 ft 5 in (15.06 m)

F-35


    • Length: 50.5 ft (15.67 m)


may be internal valume of JF-17 is not enough to support retractable refueling probe @wanglaokan sir :undecided:

Hi,

Length is not the only dimension of size---.
 
. . .

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom