AZADPAKISTAN2009
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 37,669
- Reaction score
- 68
- Country
- Location
Whats the big deal about duel seat -
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whats the big deal about duel seat -
Another spoonful of honey for taste buds.
From Chinese Military Aviation:
This is a old article, possibly of late 2010 early 2011 which I found.
Another piece from same source:
already debunked many times , these updates were whitesmoke and none of these things will appear in block 2!
I think people were discussing that KLJ-7(V2?) will operate at 30% more power enhacing its range by 10-15%.Yeah, exactly. This was just a post.
I believe block II will carry KLJ-07 radar, but with some minor upgrades in it.
I think people were discussing that KLJ-7(V2?) will operate at 30% more power enhacing its range by 10-15%.
people tend to forget can RD-93 support these updates as well and will these updates effect the performance of RD-93. I'm saying this because of the rumour rd-93 is underpower engine and as pshamim saab said similar thing in pakdef too.
RD-93 is a strong engine and hence was opted by PAF for the JFT.
It is very vulnerable to quick changes during flight, and gives a quick response.
The black smoke it emits, is quite a good sign of it's performance, which is ofcourse it's ability to meet the changes input, taking example to accelerate to maximum.
You didn't understand the context of what i'm saying, Can RD-93 support a Powerful Radar, IRST, AESA, AN IFR at the same timeand extra hard point ? The answer was no, it will degrade the RD-93 performance and TWR also
This would have made an effect if the extra weight were added to radar, if the power settings of a radar are changed,it doesn't necessarily mean that significant extra weight would be added. I always argued that a new engine was necessary before AESA making its way in JFT since it would add significant weight, thus needing either compensating the added weight by redesign (a relatively difficult approach) or addition of new and more potent engine(more realistic). Since none of these two things happened, there only a remote chance that we would see any AESA on JFT. IRST is not as heavy as radar.You didn't understand the context of what i'm saying, Can RD-93 support a Powerful Radar, IRST, AESA, AN IFR at the same timeand extra hard point ? The answer was no, it will degrade the RD-93 performance and TWR also
You cant use composits everywhere as different parts of aircraft face different levels of drag and fatigue. Thus there is a limit of weight reduction by using composits.use of more composites can help to reduce weights if all other measures fail..
but PAF should seriously look into IRST along with IFR
and arent composite surfaces hard to repair?
and arent composite surfaces hard to repair?