A.Muqeet khan
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2010
- Messages
- 981
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
hey nabil if we lets say compare jf2 with jf1 how much percentage of improvment do u think has been done
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hi,
Is the undercarriage going to be the same for blk 2 or is it going to be different ? I heard somewhere here that it will change more into like the F-16. If they do so then in my opinion this plane will look even more great.
i believe the undercarriage is pretty tough and does a good job so a change here seems unlikely. F-16 has a pretty damn expensive and complex undercarriage!
hey nabil if we lets say compare jf2 with jf1 how much percentage of improvment do u think has been done
apart of the addition of stealthy front fuselage, intakes, IRST, AESA and more composites. It is known to have a more powerful WMMC (mission computer) for smoother navigation ,sensor fusion and more weapons compatibility. These changes are specifically on PAF's request to fulfill specialized roles otherwise the current JFT is doing a pretty good job as the next gen mainstay fighter in all dimensions.
That is probably one of the reasons why the F-16 looks hot
They should try to increase the height.--- probably as high as the J-10.
In our case if the size of the nose size increases then our JF-17 would have a stronger radar. Personally, i would like to see a bigger wing area as well so we could gain more hard points.
664-670 mm as per my info housed within a composite dome of approximately 740 mm, klj-7 V2 will have the size of around 700 mm as there is ample space available for a bigger antenna for future upgrade.
diameter of the radar dome -rough estimate
F-20/T-50 => ~500mm (APG-67 family)
Gripen => ~500mm (PS/05 family)
M2000 => ~500mm (RDM, RDI, RDY families)
Rafale => ~600mm(RBE family)
MIG-29 => ~624 mm (N019, N010 families)
F-16 => ~660mm (APG-66, APG-68, APG-80 families)
JFT =>~ 670-740 mm
Typhoon => ~700mm (ECR-90/CAPTOR family)
F-18 => ~700mm (APG-65, APG-73, APG-79 families)
F-35 => ~700mm (APG-81)
F-22 => ~900mm (APG-77)
F-15 => ~950mm (APG-63, APG-70 families)
SU-27/30 => ~1000 mm (N001, N010 [924mm antenna ver], N011 faimilies)
MIG-31 => ~1400mm (N007 family)
Yes technically some add ons can increase drag. But i'm sure the Americans, Russians and the Europeans are not that dumb. They create big dimensioned aircrafts.
In our case if the size of the nose size increases then our JF-17 would have a stronger radar. Personally, i would like to see a bigger wing area as well so we could gain more hard points.
I was concerned about the height and as a matter of fact you are right--- it increases the drag and there is no advantage to it.
However, to put it in business terms, if we like to sell this plane to countries then we must try in some ways to make it look good aesthetically. I see that a lot of people complain that JF-17 looks more like Mig 21 or a third gen aircraft. So for this reason i was curious and i was trying to put an idea down to make our Chinese-Pakistani invention look unique.
but I like the designs of raptor better than F-16....Without a doubt, in terms of looks, the Falcon is my all time favorite.