Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no need for one type of aircraft to have 3 different BVRAAMs. I think PAF will end up choosing only one or at the most two.
However there could be one possibility that if the americans dont allow the armraam to be fitted on the JF-17s perhaps pakistan can consider the option of french mica.
I think this is a known variable. Americans will NOT allow AMRAAM to be integrated on the JF-17 thus PAF is looking at the MICA. Overall PAF will operate 3 BVRAAMs if the MICA deal goes through. Otherwise SD-10 would be the only option available on the JF-17.
Why Americans would not allow? We should not assume without asking?
Yes, they may very well refuse than next day when they ask our President for some thing he will have some thing to negotiate!
US should not risk the lives of 160 million people by tilting the strategic balance.
Pakistan has done so much for US that Americans cannot do the same for them self.
I wonder if PAF will seek any transfer in seeker, guidance, rocket & missile airframe technology...or buy some MBDA assistance for possible Pakistani projects? It would do wonders for Pakistan's local initiatives in a lot of areas ranging from air-to-air missiles, right down to SAMs.I think this is a known variable. Americans will NOT allow AMRAAM to be integrated on the JF-17 thus PAF is looking at the MICA. Overall PAF will operate 3 BVRAAMs if the MICA deal goes through. Otherwise SD-10 would be the only option available on the JF-17.
There is no need for one type of aircraft to have 3 different BVRAAMs. I think PAF will end up choosing only one or at the most two.
By the time the second batch (after the first 50) of JF-17 is going to be built, I think China can offer a ramjet LRAAM better than MBDA Meteor.
By the time the second batch (after the first 50) of JF-17 is going to be built, I think China can offer a ramjet LRAAM better than MBDA Meteor.