JF-17 For Myanmar Air force spotted at CAC

[WarFariX]

It's 50:50 of the value of the program and 58% of the production workshare. Some of the electronics are also being produced under license at PAC, albeit as a mix of assembly and local manufacturing.

Bhai , he knows ,bas rona lagana hai har jaga ignorants ne.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

This was an effort entirely by CAC just like JF-17B.

dozens of pakisani experts are in China working on the projects.its a real joint venture.

 

[CriticalThought]

If you want to ignore then you have full right to but dont forget 6 sep 2016 documentary on PAC which u saw 3 RUBY JF-17 under development

Hey I want to see this documentary as well.

 

[Bratva]

Just to remove any doubts this particular JF is not for Nigeria. Myanmar Mig-29

 

[Bilal Khan (Quwa)]

The fact that JF-17B development was led entirely by CAC shows its a Chinese led programme.


Not a single pic from CAC has ever showed a Pakistani on production line or design bureau.


58% of share of airframe production only.

Still doesn't change that electronics production - including some manufacturing - is done at PAC

 

[WarFariX]

Hey I want to see this documentary as well.

It was shown on geo tv , i didnt watch but did got these pics from fb

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Not a single pic from CAC has ever showed a Pakistani on production line or design bureau.

so your whole argument is based on single point and that is you don't have access to information and you don't know anyone who worked in the projects.
my teacher a retired air commodore spent 4 years in China on the program. he was a PHD doctor.
my relatives too have visited China for some part of project.

 

[Shane]

The fact that JF-17B development was led entirely by CAC shows its a Chinese led programme.


Not a single pic from CAC has ever showed a Pakistani on production line or design bureau.


58% of share of airframe production only.

Well, don't blame us if you don't take your pills on time and in the correct crevice. Now go off to the other thread and spread falls propaganda about the Saudi defence minister.

 

[Bilal Khan (Quwa)]

Assembly for PAF thunders only.

There's no mention that said work is exclusively for PAF JF-17s.

We know that 58% of the airframe work is for PAC, which - logically and mathematically - means that 42% of the airframe work goes to CAC. There is no mention of who gets the engine, radar and avionics, and rightly so since it is conditional on the customer's choices.

Bar potential third-party licensing issues, there's nothing to preclude Myanmar from contracting some of the electronics work to PAC. There are a few proprietary or collaboratively developed things PAC can offer for sale.

 

[Reichsmarschall]

Atleast we don't claim we are exporting fighter jets only to fall flat on our faces after it turns out it is being built by China instead.

and who wants to buy your junk?? even Bengalis rejected your junk

 

[Reichsmarschall]

The presence of the jet at CAC and no pic or source mentioning any Pakistani contribution means that till further proof emerges this will be considered a CaC project.


Even the sri lankans rejcted your junk.

we will still get our money

 

[SHAH820]

Hmm, inspite of the claims by Pakistanis here that PAC will build the jets for Myanmar, it turns out that Chinese production line will build them instead.

how hard is to understand simple things to you??
jf-17 was made by pakistan and china even if they buy from china we built our part and china built theirs then its send to myanmar even if they want they are never allowed to step on pakistani soil they are killers of thousands of muslims they are not allowed in pakistan

nigeria confirmed jf-17 purchase and guess what they came to pakistan

and for production paksitan make more then 50% of the aircraft and aviation city is setting up to built rest of it

 

[Trisonics]

View attachment 403199

Source : Dafeng cao

Congrats!

 

[Bilal Khan (Quwa)]

The presence of the jet at CAC and no pic or source mentioning any Pakistani contribution means that till further proof emerges this will be considered a CaC project.

The facts are as follows: (1) PAC gets 58% of the airframe work, (2) can get electronics work if contracted and (3) there's a photo of a MyAF with CAC. Anything beyond that is speculation, especially if said speculation contradicts actual facts such as stipulated contractual obligations.

 

[Reichsmarschall]

The presence of the jet at CAC and no pic or source mentioning any Pakistani contribution means that till further proof emerges this will be considered a CaC project.


Even the sri lankans rejcted your junk.

Myanmar and Nigeria are buying it
Whose gonna buy Tej@SS?? even the Bharti navy rejected that piece of shit failed aircraft