Cool_Soldier
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2011
- Messages
- 1,740
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Too much expectations from JF-17 Block-3. I hope and pray all dreams come true.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is why I always hoped that Pak's Azm NGF would be a single engine design and for the dual engine bigger 5th gen jet...Pak can acquire a few squadrons of either J20 or the TFX...Such JF17 would complement AZM FGFA very nicely. Just like F35 with the F22 raptor
Sorry, but no. The most impactful airframe changes will be invisible - i.e. more use of composite materials, strengthening of hardpoints, more 3D-printed pieces and single-construction airframe parts, etc. - rather than some hypothetical stealth shaping that will have zero impact on the Thunder's final performance once it carries weapons.
This is the most beautiful CGI Design of JF-17 Block IIIIt's a fan made CGI but one hell of elegant CGI of JF-17 BLK-III .... posting it just because that find it beautiful
View attachment 594523
Dears just saw the pics of Block 3, no change in intake, Tail is same as JF-17B, only one hardpoint increment that only for targeting pod. In short its JF-17B with a single seat. Pic cannot be shared because of promised no propagation request.This is the most beautiful CGI Design of JF-17 Block III
Dears just saw the pics of Block 3, no change in intake, Tail is same as JF-17B, only one hardpoint increment that only for targeting pod. In short its JF-17B with a single seat. Pic cannot be shared because of promised no propagation request.
Dears just saw the pics of Block 3, no change in intake, Tail is same as JF-17B, only one hardpoint increment that only for targeting pod. In short its JF-17B with a single seat. Pic cannot be shared because of promised no propagation request.
Almost
No IRST? And do you have any credentials so that we know you're not just another one of us?
Any ground clearance for RAAD II?Almost
I read about intake enlargement, in block 3 picture there does not seem any change on intakes.
If thats the case then why they are hiding. LolDears just saw the pics of Block 3, no change in intake, Tail is same as JF-17B, only one hardpoint increment that only for targeting pod. In short its JF-17B with a single seat. Pic cannot be shared because of promised no propagation request.
Almost
I read about intake enlargement, in block 3 picture there does not seem any change on intakes.
Probably not, seems like another spectator/fanboy speculating/trolling.No IRST? And do you have any credentials so that we know you're not just another one of us?
No spectator, cannot share pictures at the moment.Probably not, seems like another spectator/fanboy speculating/trolling.
No spectator, cannot share pictures at the moment.
My question here is if there is no change in intakes can an improved thurst of WS-19 series engine can be deployed on JF-17.
Almost
If there is no major difference, then why hiding it?
Contact Catic/PacIf there is no major difference, then why hiding it?