What's new

JF-17 Block-3 -- Updates, News & Discussion

It's common sense.

In the world of true diplomacy, strategical advancements & building regional bloc; it's just another common nonsense like our neighbors use to do. Nitpick & argument based upon childish behaviour. Had it been to do anything with personal likes & two line arguments; I would have agreed but sorry to say; Moscow isn't listening to you neither changing names as such will suffice to back-up such kind of trolling.
your sense of common sense is very different from most people it seems
come on and put money in the table. i know for a fact that i am close by and i could use some extra notes

It is called a kneejerk reaction having no knowledge of matter. Calling it common sense is an insult to all with such capability.
 
.
PAF experimenting with its prized creation and risking the whole thunder program and production schedule of block III which you are suggesting is very unlikely. IMHO lack of any update/news on Block III is by choice and not due to any complication/experimentation in the development cycle.
If PAF is experimenting with the WS-13 then It would make more sense that PAF is trying out a new engine on the side without interrupting the Block III production run.

JF-17 is a joint project and as much as the Chinese help us in the development, there is absolutely no reason for them to not try and push in an experimental piece of technology if it suits them. If it meets the set parameters, fine, if it doesn't, China can and will likely try some back channel persuasion. They have their interests which is only fair but to not realize such a thing on our part would be naïve. PAF would be smart to just stand its ground and not budge under 'strategic' interests like this.
'Choice' is a relative term, we probably do not want to put JF17 block 3 back in covers for a year+ deliberately by choice after announcing a test flight. We may choose to wait for better tech like Engine, a more refined radar or weapons package but if we truly had a choice, we'd probably have a workable better engine put in today, I hope it makes sense. Every block is a huge undertaking/commitment. Chinese are likely going to finish development of the engine (that they have invested over a decade in) regardless. PAF consider it if it met the performance and reliability parameters set but if those weren't met, we can't rule out soft nudges from Chinese on PAF's shoulders in this regard.

I personally have not seen any reason to believe PAC is doing all of the body work, i have a few reasons for this:
its a big deal- we would have seen an announcement
it would require a reduction in overall production capacity or an increase in production equipment or facilities- neither of which we have seen.
Overall, PAC may have increased their share- we have no way of knowing- however, 100% is very unlikely.

Plus, would Chinese just hand over 100% of production after splitting the project from the start till now? Do we know China has no intention of co-exporting JF17. What motivation would Chinese have left if PAF starts reducing avenues where Chinese can extract benefit from the project.

There is no delay. A few Block-3 jets will be made public soon. Not too different to when PAF showed about 10 x JF-17Bs a few months ago.

That is a bold claim to be making, I am wondering if it is just based on pure belief/dogma or actual credible information.

Pakistan may be bog down due to the non-availability of the engine in time. Pakistan should complete the rest of the work and the engine change may be left for the time of its availability in the future. The delay in the production of JF17 B3 will negate the edge Pakistan is looking over its rivals with the advent of block 3. The resource available for block 3 will go to the other purchases and momentous attained with the in-house production of thunders will further diminish with every day lost in the wait. Pakistan should look for alternatives as intentional delay may result in some sort of denial and exploitation of the need.

Any project is run in parallel steps for independent processes but if something like say flight software and testing requires the final engine, then there is no way PAF can speed this up.
Also, if you have an enemies outside your door with swords (read Rafale) and you have a dull kitchen knife (exaggerated comparison for understanding) in hand, would you go out with the knife or wait a few for your brother to pull out a sword from the cupboard and take the time to sharpen it to give you a better chance. So are we negating our edge or improving our chances?
India has a highly competitive fighter in Rafale with avionics and weapons package (when all configured and ready) superior to what we field right now. India won't be ready with its 2 squadrons for two years approximately which gives us enough breathing room to wait and hopefully try and get as close to achieving parity with the best India fields.
Commitment to a block of 50 jets is not a small undertaking. Engines will change in at least 2000-3000 hours of flight time which may be a decade away so do you think it is smart to wait a year for a better engine or put in an older engine that will stay in for 10 years! Remember, each engine roughly costs more than a couple of million dollars.

If it's about two years delay then we can buy two squadrons of j10c.

Even if we buy 2 squadrons, J10C will take at least 2-3 years to deliver and get integrated. It was rumored PAF had an agreement in principle to purchase J10C back in Musharraf days but then Chinese wanted PAF to fulfill its commitment of ~150 JF17s which seems to have been met. This whole hypothesis might be baloney but it still makes sense for PAF to get J10C for its multiple advantages.

- Better range and payload capacity.

- It gives PAF some counterweight to US arm twisting wrt US and F16 parts and supplies. J10C won't be 'as' leashed and prone to strategic embargoes (by the US) as the F16. In a potential conflict, US won't have as much leverage to influence PAF's ability if we added another fighter at par with our current fleet of F16s if not better.

- It gives PAF something India cannot purchase or gain access to (read DACT) as the F21/F16.

- India hates F21 (read F16) with a passion because of its flagship status with PAF. Just imagine for a second India chooses F16 for its MMRCA where it gains complete ToT. Where would that put PAF. PAF did amazing with JF17 and reducing dependence on expensive western jets, now J10C would be another step towards that.

- China would like nothing more than a large force like PAF choosing a 4+ gen fighter like J10C so to win that deal, they might throw in a really good package for us, something we cannot possibly get from anywhere else at the moment.

Russia is seriously pissed about Pakistan backing Azerbaijan against Armenia in Azerbaijan's Karabakh region. They won't supply RD-93MA to punish Pakistan. So no JF-17 Block 3 for the foreseeable future.

Russia block JF-17 Block 3 to Pakistan is just as bad as US block F-35 to Turkey.

- Would you be able to provide some information to back your claim. Why would Russia be focusing on Pakistan when it is Turkey, and more importantly physical neighbor of both Armenia and Azerbaijan, its larger strategic defense partner that is indirectly involved through its equipment in the conflict. We do not have enough weight in this fight so some statements from MoFA would hardly have Russia pissed off enough to cancel a potential long term deal that has nothing to do with the actual conflict. Pakistan has not been and will not be part of the conflict militarily.

Probably a better investment would be working with the Turks to buy their composite production techniques and applying it to the JF-17 Airframe, while we are waiting on the Engine and AESA radar.
While more expensive upfront it will help reduce maintenance and lifecycle costs in the long run, and make the JF-17 a better export prospect; “F-35 class airframe”. A good project in anticipation of Project AZM. A lighter airframe could compensate for continued use of the standard RD-93, until the RD-93MA is fully certified

We may be able to learn from Turkish but its far fetched applying composites on JF17 on our own. Design and fabrication largely lies with China and PAF doesn't have the capability yet or even if it builds it, it will be way way down in the future for it to have any tangible impact on the JF17 project. Such capabilities take years if not decades to build. Imagine we develop such a capability within a day by some magic, even then you cannot just swap parts on a jet like you can replace sheet metal hood and spoiler with carbon fiber ones to rice up a car. More importantly, the stakeholders with their %age share in the JF17 project are already defined for JF17, we cannot change that without putting the entire project at risk.
 
. .
JF-17 is a joint project and as much as the Chinese help us in the development, there is absolutely no reason for them to not try and push in an experimental piece of technology if it suits them. If it meets the set parameters, fine, if it doesn't, China can and will likely try some back channel persuasion. They have their interests which is only fair but to not realize such a thing on our part would be naïve. PAF would be smart to just stand its ground and not budge under 'strategic' interests like this.
'Choice' is a relative term, we probably do not want to put JF17 block 3 back in covers for a year+ deliberately by choice after announcing a test flight. We may choose to wait for better tech like Engine, a more refined radar or weapons package but if we truly had a choice, we'd probably have a workable better engine put in today, I hope it makes sense. Every block is a huge undertaking/commitment. Chinese are likely going to finish development of the engine (that they have invested over a decade in) regardless. PAF consider it if it met the performance and reliability parameters set but if those weren't met, we can't rule out soft nudges from Chinese on PAF's shoulders in this regard.

Plus, would Chinese just hand over 100% of production after splitting the project from the start till now? Do we know China has no intention of co-exporting JF17. What motivation would Chinese have left if PAF starts reducing avenues where Chinese can extract benefit from the project.

That is a bold claim to be making, I am wondering if it is just based on pure belief/dogma or actual credible information.

Any project is run in parallel steps for independent processes but if something like say flight software and testing requires the final engine, then there is no way PAF can speed this up.
Also, if you have an enemies outside your door with swords (read Rafale) and you have a dull kitchen knife (exaggerated comparison for understanding) in hand, would you go out with the knife or wait a few for your brother to pull out a sword from the cupboard and take the time to sharpen it to give you a better chance. So are we negating our edge or improving our chances?
India has a highly competitive fighter in Rafale with avionics and weapons package (when all configured and ready) superior to what we field right now. India won't be ready with its 2 squadrons for two years approximately which gives us enough breathing room to wait and hopefully try and get as close to achieving parity with the best India fields.
Commitment to a block of 50 jets is not a small undertaking. Engines will change in at least 2000-3000 hours of flight time which may be a decade away so do you think it is smart to wait a year for a better engine or put in an older engine that will stay in for 10 years! Remember, each engine roughly costs more than a couple of million dollars.

Even if we buy 2 squadrons, J10C will take at least 2-3 years to deliver and get integrated. It was rumored PAF had an agreement in principle to purchase J10C back in Musharraf days but then Chinese wanted PAF to fulfill its commitment of ~150 JF17s which seems to have been met. This whole hypothesis might be baloney but it still makes sense for PAF to get J10C for its multiple advantages.

- Better range and payload capacity.

- It gives PAF some counterweight to US arm twisting wrt US and F16 parts and supplies. J10C won't be 'as' leashed and prone to strategic embargoes (by the US) as the F16. In a potential conflict, US won't have as much leverage to influence PAF's ability if we added another fighter at par with our current fleet of F16s if not better.

- It gives PAF something India cannot purchase or gain access to (read DACT) as the F21/F16.

- India hates F21 (read F16) with a passion because of its flagship status with PAF. Just imagine for a second India chooses F16 for its MMRCA where it gains complete ToT. Where would that put PAF. PAF did amazing with JF17 and reducing dependence on expensive western jets, now J10C would be another step towards that.

- China would like nothing more than a large force like PAF choosing a 4+ gen fighter like J10C so to win that deal, they might throw in a really good package for us, something we cannot possibly get from anywhere else at the moment.

- Would you be able to provide some information to back your claim. Why would Russia be focusing on Pakistan when it is Turkey, and more importantly physical neighbor of both Armenia and Azerbaijan, its larger strategic defense partner that is indirectly involved through its equipment in the conflict. We do not have enough weight in this fight so some statements from MoFA would hardly have Russia pissed off enough to cancel a potential long term deal that has nothing to do with the actual conflict. Pakistan has not been and will not be part of the conflict militarily.

We may be able to learn from Turkish but its far fetched applying composites on JF17 on our own. Design and fabrication largely lies with China and PAF doesn't have the capability yet or even if it builds it, it will be way way down in the future for it to have any tangible impact on the JF17 project. Such capabilities take years if not decades to build. Imagine we develop such a capability within a day by some magic, even then you cannot just swap parts on a jet like you can replace sheet metal hood and spoiler with carbon fiber ones to rice up a car. More importantly, the stakeholders with their %age share in the JF17 project are already defined for JF17, we cannot change that without putting the entire project at risk.
Content of your post reveals that you are very sure that PAF is falling behind the time line. Do you have any evidence in this regard or your assumption is based on your own inference.

Note that as per the official time line two JF-17 Block 3 will be produced by the end of year 2020 and less than two months are still left for year 2020 to end.

PAC and PAF both know and doing their best to achieve the timeline. Very soon JF-17 Block 3 will be flying over the Pakistani airspace.
 
.
JF-17 is a joint project and as much as the Chinese help us in the development, there is absolutely no reason for them to not try and push in an experimental piece of technology if it suits them. If it meets the set parameters, fine, if it doesn't, China can and will likely try some back channel persuasion. They have their interests which is only fair but to not realize such a thing on our part would be naïve. PAF would be smart to just stand its ground and not budge under 'strategic' interests like this.
'Choice' is a relative term, we probably do not want to put JF17 block 3 back in covers for a year+ deliberately by choice after announcing a test flight. We may choose to wait for better tech like Engine, a more refined radar or weapons package but if we truly had a choice, we'd probably have a workable better engine put in today, I hope it makes sense. Every block is a huge undertaking/commitment. Chinese are likely going to finish development of the engine (that they have invested over a decade in) regardless. PAF consider it if it met the performance and reliability parameters set but if those weren't met, we can't rule out soft nudges from Chinese on PAF's shoulders in this regard.



Plus, would Chinese just hand over 100% of production after splitting the project from the start till now? Do we know China has no intention of co-exporting JF17. What motivation would Chinese have left if PAF starts reducing avenues where Chinese can extract benefit from the project.



That is a bold claim to be making, I am wondering if it is just based on pure belief/dogma or actual credible information.



Any project is run in parallel steps for independent processes but if something like say flight software and testing requires the final engine, then there is no way PAF can speed this up.
Also, if you have an enemies outside your door with swords (read Rafale) and you have a dull kitchen knife (exaggerated comparison for understanding) in hand, would you go out with the knife or wait a few for your brother to pull out a sword from the cupboard and take the time to sharpen it to give you a better chance. So are we negating our edge or improving our chances?
India has a highly competitive fighter in Rafale with avionics and weapons package (when all configured and ready) superior to what we field right now. India won't be ready with its 2 squadrons for two years approximately which gives us enough breathing room to wait and hopefully try and get as close to achieving parity with the best India fields.
Commitment to a block of 50 jets is not a small undertaking. Engines will change in at least 2000-3000 hours of flight time which may be a decade away so do you think it is smart to wait a year for a better engine or put in an older engine that will stay in for 10 years! Remember, each engine roughly costs more than a couple of million dollars.



Even if we buy 2 squadrons, J10C will take at least 2-3 years to deliver and get integrated. It was rumored PAF had an agreement in principle to purchase J10C back in Musharraf days but then Chinese wanted PAF to fulfill its commitment of ~150 JF17s which seems to have been met. This whole hypothesis might be baloney but it still makes sense for PAF to get J10C for its multiple advantages.

- Better range and payload capacity.

- It gives PAF some counterweight to US arm twisting wrt US and F16 parts and supplies. J10C won't be 'as' leashed and prone to strategic embargoes (by the US) as the F16. In a potential conflict, US won't have as much leverage to influence PAF's ability if we added another fighter at par with our current fleet of F16s if not better.

- It gives PAF something India cannot purchase or gain access to (read DACT) as the F21/F16.

- India hates F21 (read F16) with a passion because of its flagship status with PAF. Just imagine for a second India chooses F16 for its MMRCA where it gains complete ToT. Where would that put PAF. PAF did amazing with JF17 and reducing dependence on expensive western jets, now J10C would be another step towards that.

- China would like nothing more than a large force like PAF choosing a 4+ gen fighter like J10C so to win that deal, they might throw in a really good package for us, something we cannot possibly get from anywhere else at the moment.



- Would you be able to provide some information to back your claim. Why would Russia be focusing on Pakistan when it is Turkey, and more importantly physical neighbor of both Armenia and Azerbaijan, its larger strategic defense partner that is indirectly involved through its equipment in the conflict. We do not have enough weight in this fight so some statements from MoFA would hardly have Russia pissed off enough to cancel a potential long term deal that has nothing to do with the actual conflict. Pakistan has not been and will not be part of the conflict militarily.



We may be able to learn from Turkish but its far fetched applying composites on JF17 on our own. Design and fabrication largely lies with China and PAF doesn't have the capability yet or even if it builds it, it will be way way down in the future for it to have any tangible impact on the JF17 project. Such capabilities take years if not decades to build. Imagine we develop such a capability within a day by some magic, even then you cannot just swap parts on a jet like you can replace sheet metal hood and spoiler with carbon fiber ones to rice up a car. More importantly, the stakeholders with their %age share in the JF17 project are already defined for JF17, we cannot change that without putting the entire project at risk.

your right, with that much change it would practically be a new design. Considering both Turkey and Pakistan need a modern jet to fulfill what a modern F-16 could do, while still being competitive against future 5th generation threats, it falls to the Turks (who have the great need) to see if they want to double down on the T-FX or start a second, but single engine project.

The JF-17 as is maybe a neasecarily purchase by the Turks if they are having political issues with their F-16 fleet.

making the single seat single engine stealthy Delta canard (powered by a F110 class engine) T-FX would be a great stepping stone towards project AZM, and as an independent Turkish product, they could hire as many Pakistani pilots as they need while they rebuild the ranks of their pilot corp. Also this design would be presumably cheaper then the twin engine T-FX. It would be a better long term buy for the Turks then the JF-17, and maybe a fighter they in turn could export to Pakistan.

The Turks are going for a more conventional layout with the T-FX, but their single engine design from the following three has all the elements we will need to perfect for Project AZM; the S-shaped intake duct to maintain airflow and stealthiness from all angles, the front section (cockpit and radar and avionics) could be exactly what ends up in Project AZM, the stealthy PeliKan tail and exhaust nozzle, the internal weapons bay and especially an engine in the class of the F-110, made in a friendly Muslim country. It’s a win win prospect for Turkey and Pakistan.

couple this design with a much cheaper unmanned loyal wingman variant and it may help Turkey make up the numbers shortfall they have in their pilot numbers as well as help Pakistan make up its quantity balance against India.

 
Last edited:
. .
Content of your post reveals that you are very sure that PAF is falling behind the time line. Do you have any evidence in this regard or your assumption is based on your own inference.
Note that as per the official time line two JF-17 Block 3 will be produced by the end of year 2020 and less than two months are still left for year 2020 to end.

PAC and PAF both know and doing their best to achieve the timeline. Very soon JF-17 Block 3 will be flying over the Pakistani airspace.

What part of my post makes you think PAF is falling behind in the timeline or I am sure about it. May be you are extrapolating from the overall theme of my post which suggests that it would be understandable if Block 3 took longer to roll off the production due to changed deliverables (read Engine and other upgrades) originally slated when Block 3 was conceived. Projects have trade-offs, you may be willing to accept a change of timeline if it means you get a better product which isn't exactly what you originally put on paper. It is exactly that, a trade-off and not necessarily a delay in everyone's books.

your right, with that much change it would practically be a new design. Considering both Turkey and Pakistan need a modern jet to fulfill what a modern F-16 could do, while still being competitive against future 5th generation threats, it falls to the Turks (who have the great need) to see if they want to double down on the T-FX or start a second, but single engine project.

Turkey has over a 100 major defense projects going on which is already more than probably it can chew so taking lead on a new 5th generation project is far fetched.

The JF-17 as is maybe a neasecarily purchase by the Turks if they are having political issues with their F-16 fleet.

Turkey is operating over 200 F16s, and has a lot of parts and serviceability component figured out. They have been partners in F35 until very recently so JF17 does not really tickle a fancy for Turkish Air Force in a realistic scenario.

...and as an independent Turkish product, they could hire as many Pakistani pilots as they need while they rebuild the ranks of their pilot corp.

Turkish Air Force has over a century of history and world war experience so they definitely know how to rebuild their force. When was the last time any of us saw an air force as established as Turkish air force take for hire pilots off another air force and when was the last time an air force as established as PAF formally offer its pilots as contractors.
 
.
What part of my post makes you think PAF is falling behind in the timeline or I am sure about it. May be you are extrapolating from the overall theme of my post which suggests that it would be understandable if Block 3 took longer to roll off the production due to changed deliverables (read Engine and other upgrades) originally slated when Block 3 was conceived. Projects have trade-offs, you may be willing to accept a change of timeline if it means you get a better product which isn't exactly what you originally put on paper. It is exactly that, a trade-off and not necessarily a delay in everyone's books.



Turkey has over a 100 major defense projects going on which is already more than probably it can chew so taking lead on a new 5th generation project is far fetched.



Turkey is operating over 200 F16s, and has a lot of parts and serviceability component figured out. They have been partners in F35 until very recently so JF17 does not really tickle a fancy for Turkish Air Force in a realistic scenario.



Turkish Air Force has over a century of history and world war experience so they definitely know how to rebuild their force. When was the last time any of us saw an air force as established as Turkish air force take for hire pilots off another air force and when was the last time an air force as established as PAF formally offer its pilots as contractors.

Not my opinion, just referencing a news story. After the massive purge of the Turkish air foece (The core of the coup plotters), Turkey had less than 1 pilot per plane. 2 pilots for every 3 planes if I remember correctly) they were pulling pilots out of retirement and out of airlines to fly their F-16s. Hiring a few Pakistani pilots to help is win win for both air forces. It’s not insult to the fine capabilities of the Turkish Air Force, just a reflection of how severe the purge was.

maybe the story is false, Greek propaganda, but it maybe true considering the extend of the purge in 2016. Can any Turkish member shed some light on this matter?

 
. .
Actually, most of these block 3 advances and capabilities with little enhancement will also add up to project AZM. Hence my opinion is that progress in block 3 can also be counted as progress in AZM.
Before AzM there possibilities of block 4 and 5 as initial indiction plan for JFTs was 250 apx with block size of 50 ..
So its long way thay jft lead to azm
 
.
How fast can the Block 3 go? And is it’s engine reliable for sand storm climate?
 
. . . . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom