jews-hereditary-degenerate

[Hamza913]

it still valid.

Not when it comes to sensitive information like this.

 

[Cherokee]

As mentioned in an earlier thread that statistic is complete crap, cousin marriages are perfectly alright an overwhelming majority of the time

See, I can type in bold and underline too.

Ok BBC is lying, got it. I am sure this research paper by british pakistanis is completely crap as well . They must be sell outs trying to brainwash you against this great tradition. .https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567984/

Per sannu ki, keep marrying cousins

 

[Hamza913]

Ok BBC is lying, got it. I am sure this research paper by british pakistanis is completely crap as well . They must be sell outs trying to brainwash you against this great tradition. .https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567984/

Per sannu ki, keep marrying cousins

We can play that game, you'll only end up looking like a complete moron.

http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/end-stigma-of-cousin-marriage-researcher-20120426-1xne6.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/s...s-getting-married-scientists-say-1210072.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16188785
https://www.cousincouples.com/?page=overview

Some also estimate that 80% of marriages throughout human history have been between first cousins and closer, it has always been something practised among humans up until recently.

Also, your fellow Hindustanis down south get even more freaky with relatives (they marry their aunties and uncles), so it's not just a Pakistani thing.

 

[Cherokee]

Also, your fellow Hindustanis down south get even more freaky with relatives (they marry their aunties and uncles), so it's not just a Pakistani thing.

And I chide them for this disgusting stupid practice as well. Now coming back to the point so you believe those Pakistani medical researchers who wrote this paper are lying, BBC is lying, everyone is lying. Got it .

 

[Hamza913]

And I chide them for this disgusting stupid practice as well. Now coming back to the point so you believe those Pakistani medical researchers who wrote this paper are lying, BBC is lying, everyone is lying. Got it .

Did you bother to read the links I sent you?

Of course you didn't, morons like you say whatever is popular even if it's blatantly incorrect.

 

[Cherokee]

Did you bother to read the links I sent you?
.

There are scientists who do not believe in global warming or evolution as well. I go with the overwhelming opinion as far as science is concerned. In this case Overwhelming opinion is cousin marriages over generations lead to many genetic recessive disorders which becomes very clear when you compare these defects amongst communities who practice same sex marriage in UK vs the general population.

morons like you say whatever is popular even if it's blatantly incorrect.

Rather be a moron, than a retard.

 

[Hamza913]

There are scientists who do not believe in global warming or evolution as well. I go with the overwhelming opinion as far as science is concerned. In this case Overwhelming opinion is cousin marriages over generations lead to many genetic recessive disorders which becomes very clear when you compare these defects amongst communities who practice same sex marriage in UK vs the general population.



Rather be a moron, than a retard.

Lol you're the one who quoted BBC as proof, where as I brought Alan Bittles (worlds leading geneticist btw, studied this topic for 30+ years), and plenty other scientists.

The global warming analogy is a poor one. Numerous scientists say it's fine, and cite actual evidence unlike you cuckoos who pull out this 1/3 statistic from your rear (haven't found a single study confirming it btw, if you can I'd be impressed).

Cousin marriages are fine, there is an increased risk of defects but it's still low in absolute terms. On average, there's about the same risk of defection as a 40 year old giving birth.

 

[MultaniGuy]

Lol you're the one who quoted BBC as proof, where as I brought Alan Bittles (worlds leading geneticist btw, studied this topic for 30+ years), and plenty other scientists.

The global warming analogy is a poor one. Numerous scientists say it's fine, and cite actual evidence unlike you cuckoos who pull out this 1/3 statistic from your rear (haven't found a single study confirming it btw, if you can I'd be impressed).

Cousin marriages are fine, there is an increased risk of defects but it's still low in absolute terms. On average, there's about the same risk of defection as a 40 year old giving birth.

The defects from cousin marriages are exaggerated.

Only if you marry your 1st cousin generation and then the next generation does it and then the next generation does it.

 

[Hamza913]

The defects from cousin marriages are exaggerated.

Only if you marry your 1st cousin generation and then the next generation does it and then the next generation does it.

Even then, to get to the point where it becomes even 10% would take some serious inbreeding skills, it's practically impossible.

Since an extremely minute number of people would get to that percentage, they won't really add much to the overall defect rate

 

[MultaniGuy]

Even then, to get to the point where it becomes even 10% would take some serious inbreeding skills, it's practically impossible.

Since an extremely minute number of people would get to that percentage, they won't really add much to the overall defect rate

I agree with you brother.

But unfortunately there are some thick-skulls who think cousin marriages lead to defects right away.

 

[Hamza913]

I agree with you brother.

But unfortunately there are some thick-skulls who think cousin marriages lead to defects right away.

It depends on the individual, but it's highly unlikely for it to occur unless you have a history of diseases already in your family.

But in those cases, common logic should take over and if it doesn't, that's called being stupid. It only makes these morons appear even more thick in the head when you consider people from over a thousand years ago also knew this, without the scientific evidence we have today.

 

[Cherokee]

Lol you're the one who quoted BBC as proof, where as I brought Alan Bittles (worlds leading geneticist btw, studied this topic for 30+ years), and plenty other scientists.

The global warming analogy is a poor one. Numerous scientists say it's fine, and cite actual evidence unlike you cuckoos who pull out this 1/3 statistic from your rear (haven't found a single study confirming it btw, if you can I'd be impressed).

Cousin marriages are fine, there is an increased risk of defects but it's still low in absolute terms. On average, there's about the same risk of defection as a 40 year old giving birth.

That one third stats is for British Pakistanis living in Bradford . Also I am not claiming it happens over a single generation over multiple generations the risk increase astronomically .

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jul/04/marriage-first-cousins-birth-defects

If you believe that even guardian is lying than I am done.

Here's the original research paper which media picked up : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10853987_Consanguinity_and_disease_coincidence

Another research paper as well :
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(13)61132-0/abstract

 

[Hamza913]

That one third stats is for British Pakistanis living in Bradford . Also I am not claiming it happens over a single generation over multiple generations the risk increase astronomically .

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jul/04/marriage-first-cousins-birth-defects

If you believe that even guardian is lying than I am done.

If you can cite a scientific article proving this claim I'll believe it, otherwise, it will continue to remain as a lie because actual studies (which I've cited) show that the risk is approximately 4-6% as compared to 2-3% for non cousin couples.

Oh and it's funny you mention Bradford, because your beloved scientific journal BBC disagrees with itself on this one:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-23183102

 

[Cherokee]

If you can cite a scientific article proving this claim I'll believe it, otherwise, it will continue to remain as a lie because actual studies (which I've cited) show that the risk is approximately 4-6% as compared to 2-3% for non cousin couples.

Oh and it's funny you mention Bradford, because your beloved scientific journal BBC disagrees with itself on this one:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-23183102

Quoted the research papers above .

 

[Hamza913]

Quoted the research papers above .

The acrticle explains consanguineous marriages account for 1/3 of defects in Bradford, a place where Pakistanis make up roughly 20% of the population. So it clearly proves that the 3% of Pakistanis in the UK are not accounting for 1/3 of the UK's defects, but rather, consanguineous couples among the 20% of Pakistanis in Bradford are accounting for 1/3 of Bradford's defects.

So the number isn't as monstrous as you or others make it out to be.