500
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2010
- Messages
- 16,678
- Reaction score
- 38
- Country
- Location
I dont know what u are babbling there.You are again mixing different things to try and make a case for "Jewish rule over Jerusalem".
Look at the following:
After the Prophet Hazrat Yusuf-Peace Be Upon Him - PBUH (Joseph) Israelites stayed in Egypt and due to the teachings of Hazrat Yusuf the descendants of 12-brothers managed to achieve higher places for themselves.
After this there was a Nationalist revolution in Egypt and Israelites were made slaves (The Pharos).
The first Prophet after Hazrat Yusuf was Hazrat Musa-PBUH (Moses). With him Israelites went out of Egypt and then followed him for many decades.
Hazrat Musa-PBUH was followed by the Prophet Hazrat Yusha-PBUH (Josuha) and then many other Prophets - about 12,000 in total.
But the point to be noted is that, no one after Hazrat Musa-PBUH was given the Shariah; not even Hazrat Daood-PBUH (David) - who was given the book. Therefore, from the time of Hazrat Musa-PBUH till the time of Hazrat Zikriyah-PBUH and Hazrat Yahya-PBUH (John The Baptist) and even Hazrat Issa-PBUH (Jesus) it was only and only the Shariah of Hazrat Musa-PBUH that everyone followed - CORRECT?
Now! if you agree to the above, no where in the Shariah of Hazrat Musa-PBUH, there are meant to be the "KINGS" or a "KINGDOM". Israelites were meant to be a "Kingdom of Priests" not a "Supreme Monarch".
In addition, the fundamental fact you are ignoring is, that from the times of Hazrat Musa-PBUH till the times of Hazrat Yahya-PBUH and Hazrat Issa-PBUH there is not a single day in the history of Israelites that there was not a Prophet amongst them - do you agree?
So! if there was always a Prophet amongst the Israelites from the times of Hazrat Musa-PBUH till the times of Hazrat Yahya-PBUH and Hazrat Issa-PBUH; then the only leader that could be (or would be) has to be the Prophet of the relevant time.
And if every Prophet followed the Shariah of Hazrat Musa-PBUH, then how can their be any King of Israel at all and how can there be any rule of Israelites?
Can you explain this dichotomy that has been created by your arguments?
By your own account during he first period Jews ruled in Jerusalem from 1000 BC to 586 BC. That's 414 years and not 87 as u claimed.
Second Temple lasted from 516 BC to 70 AD, that's 586 years. Although most of this period Jews had an autonomy and not full rule.