What's new

Jehad calls against India in Pak national assembly

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
Where does it say in the UN resolutions we have to remove all troops?

Troops have to be reduced. to a 3000-6000 level while India has to reduce to the 12000-18000 levels.

You get the larger force but its still all good. Wow we are just so confident.

Yeah, well PA doesn't have to deal with hindu militants stuffed to the gills with RDX streaming across the border.
 
.
Hey the separatists would be happy that you're listening to them and holding the plebiscite. There won't be any bombings when you are giving everyone a fair chance to decide.
 
. . .
Censors are there to warn you off... Repeated usage would mean a blatant disregard for the Forum.
 
.
Hey the separatists would be happy that you're listening to them and holding the plebiscite. There won't be any bombings when you are giving everyone a fair chance to decide.

Dont we all love the morally high Pakistani's.
 
. .
Censors are there to warn you off... Repeated usage would mean a blatant disregard for the Forum.

Those names are given by International organizations, and I will say the same. It goes against my nationalistic values to say something against. For your convieniece i have called it j&K as IOK, and I would call AJK as ***. You can continue to call whatever you, but you wont influence my thinking in such a way,

Thank you
 
. .
Where does it say in the UN resolutions we have to remove all troops?

Troops have to be reduced. to a 3000-6000 level while India has to reduce to the 12000-18000 levels.

You get the larger force but its still all good. Wow we are just so confident.

There's something called troop concentration, if you've heard of it.
 
.
And a fairly good one. If you post like that. Two thumbs up for you.

Again, let me update you with something new for you. There was no, or is such thing called *** as you can see, there is no such thing like that on this site either. It is a made up theory by the right wing hindu nationalist party to put up their claim in order to have an automatic edge into the resolution. One is Northern Areas and Other is Aksai Chin (China). What the real discussing area is Jammu & Kashmir, also known as Indian Occupied Kashmir, which needs to be solved and be given to Pakistan where it belongs. Otherwise, the theory i posted above can be used as well.

Thanks.

Land aligned to India was labelled as IOK, why not the same treatment for Aksai Chin too?

The lesser we speak about *** the better, Azad Kashmir, whats azad about it. When the EQ struck the world saw how much azad it is. It was Mushraff who called for relief, it was PA soldiers who dies in the bunker, it was Pakistan that recieved the aid. Why not 'Azad Kashmir'?
 
. .
Let's hold one in ours and yours Kashmirs first shall we? All the fight is about that one. And the Question of the loyalty of the Kashmiris lies within J&K (not AJK but hey, let's bring AJK into the equation and maybe Northern Areas too). We are so confident about the result, why are you the one shying away from some good ol' fashioned voting?

We will hold the plebiscite according to the UN resolutions... All the UN resolutions upon Kashmir.

Speak to the chineese first abt the Aksai and then come to us.
 
.
It's a bannable offence. There is a difference.

Please put the same in the rule book and I will follow it, uptil then ....

Edit: It is not about taking on mods or something like that. It is about us knowing that what words are banned and such things. For example , F*ck is a banned word, but defintiely notevery one knows Azad Kashmir word is also bannable.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom