What's new

Jawan dies, 4 others injured in Pak shelling in Naushera

#FLASH One soldier killed in Pak firing in Machhal Sector of Kupwara district, Jammu and Kashmir

One soldier martyred in Pak sniping at Machhal Sect .In retaliation fire assault with heavy weapons being directed on many Pak posts
 
.
this is what he said. no way a maj. Gen. makes such a mistake while talking about the sacrifice his men done in the 2 year long operation.
That’s what Pakistan did in its nearly two-year Operation Zarb-e-azb targeting al-
Qaida and its offshoots in North Waziristan, at a tremendous sacrifice of some
780 special forces, according to Maj. Gen. Tahir Masood, commander of the
Pakistani Special Services Group (SSG).

http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/international/2016/05/09/sofex-pakistanilebanese-
commanders-recount-bloody-battles-against-jihadis/84137942/

You can believe in this news if you want to. Nobody is stopping you.

The news however is illogical and too hard to believe for a lot of reasons for anyone who is aware of Paksitan's tribal operations.
 
.
LOL proof of surgical strike is with the Pakistani army and killed terrorists . I assure you they don't need any further proof of surgical strikes .
If you think IA will reveal operational details of the surgical strike , then you are born yesterday .
Why is it with the Pakistani army? Shouldn't it be with yours?
 
.
You can believe in this news if you want to. Nobody is stopping you.

The news however is illogical and too hard to believe for a lot of reasons for anyone who is aware of Paksitan's tribal operations.
i believe that SSG major because of many logical reasons.
 
.
Rather than just mouthing off nonsense, first acquire some comprehension to understand the psyche of a post.
I referred to your big adventure as the so called surgical strikes.....that doesn't mean it happened or i agree to the Indian nonsense.
Yea, you didn't suffer a single causality since your defence minister claims they were Hanuman soldiers.
Isn't it ironic that you claim that several dozens soldiers carried out the strikes several miles inside Pakistan for several hours and all returned unscathed yet a single Chandoo is picked up instantly when he crossed the border.
Although Pakistan did claim some half a dozen Indian casualties on 29th September but since then it has never made any claims unlike your army which gives out ridiculous figures on daily basis, but doesn't have an iota of proof to back it's claims....but just the numbers keeps the Indians happy.....so just thrive on all the BS that's being fed to you.....but don't forget to count the cost.
:o::o::o:
can't expect better than this from you..
you came to know about the causality because indian army said/acknowledged it. and no one said that indian army don't have any causality during loc firing.. but in cross border strike.. yes we don't have any causality. if we had then indian army would had acknowledged that. we don't hide causality on our side.
buddy, that operation was carried out by special forces, they know how to infiltrate, conduct an operation and ex-filtrate without detected by enemy. if you don't know about how special forces are trained.. then its your problem.
and for the authenticity of indian army's cross border strike.. here is the conformation from BBC news.

Despite the use of the term "surgical strikes", the Indians definitely did not airdrop commandos to hit "launching pads of militants" inside Pakistani-held territory, or conduct ground assaults deep into the Pakistan-administered side. But they did cross the Line of Control (LoC), in some cases by more than a kilometre, to hit nearby Pakistani border posts.

Police officials on the Pakistani side privately concede that such a ground assault did occur in the Madarpur-Titrinot region of Poonch sector, west of Srinagar, where a Pakistani post was destroyed and one soldier killed.


In Leepa valley to the north, locals said that the Indians crossed the LoC and set up their guns on ridges directly overlooking the village of Mundakali. A Pakistani border post located at some distance east of the village was hit. Two other posts higher up in the mountains were also hit. At least four Pakistani soldiers were injured in the attack, which lasted from 05:00am until 8:00am, locals said.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-37702790
now don't say that BBC is indian propaganda.. and for your kind information, that reporter(M Ilyas Khan) is Pakistani.

that reporter did his part.. he try to collect as much info as he can. and that reporter reach those area days after the attack occured so obviously he don't know about how army militants/pakistan army killed.
 
. .
i believe that SSG major because of many logical reasons.

You believe because it suits you being a bharati. And you have no logical reason either.

You never needed one too.

:o::o::o:
can't expect better than this from you..
you came to know about the causality because indian army said/acknowledged it. and no one said that indian army don't have any causality during loc firing.. but in cross border strike.. yes we don't have any causality. if we had then indian army would had acknowledged that. we don't hide causality on our side.
buddy, that operation was carried out by special forces, they know how to infiltrate, conduct an operation and ex-filtrate without detected by enemy. if you don't know about how special forces are trained.. then its your problem.
and for the authenticity of indian army's cross border strike.. here is the conformation from BBC news.

Despite the use of the term "surgical strikes", the Indians definitely did not airdrop commandos to hit "launching pads of militants" inside Pakistani-held territory, or conduct ground assaults deep into the Pakistan-administered side. But they did cross the Line of Control (LoC), in some cases by more than a kilometre, to hit nearby Pakistani border posts.

Police officials on the Pakistani side privately concede that such a ground assault did occur in the Madarpur-Titrinot region of Poonch sector, west of Srinagar, where a Pakistani post was destroyed and one soldier killed.


In Leepa valley to the north, locals said that the Indians crossed the LoC and set up their guns on ridges directly overlooking the village of Mundakali. A Pakistani border post located at some distance east of the village was hit. Two other posts higher up in the mountains were also hit. At least four Pakistani soldiers were injured in the attack, which lasted from 05:00am until 8:00am, locals said.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-37702790
now don't say that BBC is indian propaganda.. and for your kind information, that reporter(M Ilyas Khan) is Pakistani.

that reporter did his part.. he try to collect as much info as he can. and that reporter reach those area days after the attack occurred so obviously he don't know about how army militants/pakistan army killed.

This report has been posted weeks ago. And has been discussed thoroughly.. Even this report rejects all your claims of surgical strike and also fails to find proof for death of any "militant". Nothing new has been rejected in this article.

You were banned in those days when we were discussing this report. Not our fault though. Now we would have to reject all your claims on this report.

What a useless hard work for us Pakistanis. :lol:
 
.
:o::o::o:
can't expect better than this from you..
you came to know about the causality because indian army said/acknowledged it. and no one said that indian army don't have any causality during loc firing.. but in cross border strike.. yes we don't have any causality. if we had then indian army would had acknowledged that. we don't hide causality on our side.
buddy, that operation was carried out by special forces, they know how to infiltrate, conduct an operation and ex-filtrate without detected by enemy. if you don't know about how special forces are trained.. then its your problem.
and for the authenticity of indian army's cross border strike.. here is the conformation from BBC news.

Despite the use of the term "surgical strikes", the Indians definitely did not airdrop commandos to hit "launching pads of militants" inside Pakistani-held territory, or conduct ground assaults deep into the Pakistan-administered side. But they did cross the Line of Control (LoC), in some cases by more than a kilometre, to hit nearby Pakistani border posts.

Police officials on the Pakistani side privately concede that such a ground assault did occur in the Madarpur-Titrinot region of Poonch sector, west of Srinagar, where a Pakistani post was destroyed and one soldier killed.


In Leepa valley to the north, locals said that the Indians crossed the LoC and set up their guns on ridges directly overlooking the village of Mundakali. A Pakistani border post located at some distance east of the village was hit. Two other posts higher up in the mountains were also hit. At least four Pakistani soldiers were injured in the attack, which lasted from 05:00am until 8:00am, locals said.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-37702790
now don't say that BBC is indian propaganda.. and for your kind information, that reporter(M Ilyas Khan) is Pakistani.

that reporter did his part.. he try to collect as much info as he can. and that reporter reach those area days after the attack occured so obviously he don't know about how army militants/pakistan army killed.

Try to knock some sense, the BBC reporter is using the Indian source which claimed to have spoken to some Policeman on Pakistani side, forget what does a common Policeman has to do with what's happening on a highly sensitive border situation, he was also dumb enough to disclose his rank and file. It's understandable that while your own MPs and MLAs are calling the whole episode a farce, you have no choice but to grasp onto straws to salvage some pride.
In the meantime PTI is reporting another Indian causality.

Indian soldier killed in Pakistani sniper fire in Machhil Sector of Kashmir, says Army.
 
.
So when do the next sir G Kal strikes happen? Now that PA have directly killed a double digit number?
 
.
Ironically, India never disclosed any casualties on the day it carried out the so called surgical strikes, but since then, it has been admitting to the deaths of it's soldiers virtually every other day.

main-qimg-8dafb195a2c096ecc882503eb3c6058b-c
 
.
You believe because it suits you being a bharati. And you have no logical reason either.

You never needed one too.



This report has been posted weeks ago. And has been discussed thoroughly.. Even this report rejects all your claims of surgical strike and also fails to find proof for death of any "militant". Nothing new has been rejected in this article.

You were banned in those days when we were discussing this report. Not our fault though. Now we would have to reject all your claims on this report.

What a useless hard work for us Pakistanis. :lol:
Proof tho app OBL ke 2 Salla se maag rahe the? and proof about AK khan also from 5 yrs , only when US provided proof you acted , which shows you didn't know what AK khan doing inside your own country?

When u cant find proof against AK Khan , how can u find proof against strike
 
Last edited:
.
Ironically, India never disclosed any casualties on the day it carried out the so called surgical strikes, but since then, it has been admitting to the deaths of it's soldiers virtually every other day.

That's better than a 10 year time frame right ? casualties reported on cease fire violation has been there for the past many decades now. if u cant or wont accept the surgical strike u cant link everything to the surgical strike to satisfy ur ego
 
.
Ironically, India never disclosed any casualties on the day it carried out the so called surgical strikes, but since then, it has been admitting to the deaths of it's soldiers virtually every other day.
SF did the surgical strike.None of the one killed are SF.
 
.
SF did the surgical strike.None of the one killed are SF.

Dude are you trying to explain it to @Windjammer who's soul can sleep well once the Indian causalities is seen but never knows or will always remain ignorant to the fact about the casualties of his own army bcoz they wont report it
 
.
Dude are you trying to explain it to @Windjammer who's soul can sleep well once the Indian causalities is seen but never knows or will always remain ignorant to the fact about the casualties of his own army bcoz they wont report it
I know.

PAK ARMY didint report the real figures in kargil,zarb e azab and even now.They lost around 5 soldiers in one region and they say the total figure was 2 in the surgical strike.

But ya i quoted him so that even his biased mind thinks what its saying...none of our SF operators have died in the last few months so how can they say Indian army is hiding surgical strike killings and showing them now.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom