What's new

Japan's Abe says TPP would have strategic significance if China joined

Aepsilons

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
24,960
Reaction score
118
Country
Japan
Location
United States
Comment: I told you guys so! ;)

-----------------


r




Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe welcomed the pan-Pacific agreement struck in the United States on Monday, which would liberalize trade in 40 percent of the world economy, though he said bringing China into the deal in future would increase its strategic significance.

"The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) establishes in the Asia-Pacific a free, fair and open international economic system with countries that share the basic values of freedom, democracy, basic human rights and the rule of law," Abe told a nationally televised news conference.

"It would contribute largely to our nation's security and Asia-Pacific regional stability, and it would have significant strategic meaning if China joined the system in the future."

Twelve Pacific Rim countries reached the most ambitious trade pact in a generation, although the deal faces scepticism from U.S. lawmakers, who can vote the deal down.

If approved, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) pact would cut trade barriers and set common standards from Vietnam to Canada. It would also furnish a legacy-shaping victory for U.S. President Barack Obama and a political win for Abe, who has touted TPP as a way to boost growth in an economy checked by a shrinking population.

The agreement has also been pitched as a way to counter China's rising economic and political clout in the region.

Abe, whose ruling bloc faces a national election next July, stressed TPP would benefit Japanese consumers, workers, rural regions and companies of all sizes, not just major corporations.

"All in all, (TPP) will be a huge tailwind for Japanese companies to conduct business overseas," Abe said. "TPP definitely brings benefits to consumers and working people. The agreement would benefit the growth of Japan."

In a nod to politically powerful farmers worried they will suffer from a flood of imports after the deal, Abe said he would set up a new headquarters to craft steps to mitigate the impact.

"I am aware many people are deeply concerned," he said. The beautiful scenery of the countryside, home towns with traditional culture where people help each other, the national character we are proud of will continue to be protected. Our determination will not change at all," said the conservative leader.


Japan's Abe says TPP would have strategic significance if China joined| Reuters
 
. . . . . . . . . .
It is inevitable that China joins. Mark my lips....China will join. ;)

Effect of TTP would be mitigated on some major economies like India and China if they sign individual FTAs on par with with major TTP signatories.

For Example Japan and India already have a FTA and India is progressing on BIT (Bilateral Investment Treaty) with US. China too is very competitive with a large global presence in supply chain so effect would be minimal on China

Joining TTP is extremely complex issue due to some stringent condition on IPR, in some sectors like Pharma IPR is very contentious.
 
.
No way...


80% of TPP nations already signed FTA with China or on the way, the left are US and Japan!


it's ok for them to get Kick out of the world's largest consumer market!

Yep, the two countries that boycotted the AIIB now ask us to step into the death trap that was set for us.

Do they think we are retarded or what?
 
.
China would treasure an FTA with Korea and Japan much more.

I do not think the TPP won't be in China's radar at least for another two decades. And before we make China join it, let's first see what the agreement really is, what the sides are thinking about it, and when the sides will ratify it.

Will it be a speedy process as the fair and balanced AIIB has achieved so far?

Besides, China has its own conceptualization, the RCEP. Efforts will be dedicated to complete it.

China understands TPP is as much geopolitical as economic. In this case, it does not see no difference between the Pivot and TPP.

China has response to it, but it does not include participation in it.
 
.
No thanks, we will focus on the one road one belt, AIIB, and NDB.

The TPP is not our interest.
Make sure you keep this statment with your life time. If i ever see you said anything opposite i will slap on your stupid head as a reminder.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom