What's new

Japanese premier in Delhi to boost economic, Defence Ties

Chanakyaa

BANNED
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
6,538
Reaction score
-36
Country
India
Location
India
NEW DELHI, Dec 28 (Reuters) - Japan's prime minister, who has promised to forge a new place for east Asia in international diplomacy, opened three days of talks in India on Monday focusing on engineering a further thaw in relations and boosting trade.

Yukio Hatoyama took office in September after 50 years of almost uninterrupted rule by the conservative, pro-U.S. Liberal Democratic Party, but has since seen his popularity ratings slide to 50 percent in a survey published on Monday.

Japan and India, Asia's largest and third largest economies, have been working at improving ties since Japan slapped sanctions on India in response to its 1998 nuclear tests.

Hatoyama launched his visit by meeting Indian industrialists, including Tata group chairman Ratan Tata and Reliance Industries (RELI.BO) head Mukesh Ambani, at a Mumbai hotel which was one of the targets attacked by gunmen in November 2008. He was due later to hold talks with his Indian opposite number, Manmohan Singh.

India, long a top recipient of Japanese aid, wants details of Hatoyama's foreign policy, particularly Tokyo's attempts to pursue a foreign policy more "independent" of Washington and improve ties with China, New Delhi's longtime rival.

New Delhi will want to know more about India's place in Hatoyama's proposed East Asian community with a single currency, inspired by the 27-nation European Union.

"Yukio Hatoyama ... is unlike any other Japanese leader that the Indian side has dealt with in the past decade," wrote Siddharth Varadarajan, a senior editor at The Hindu newspaper.

"Hatoyama's vision of an East Asian Community and his desire to work with China provides India and Japan with an opportunity to build their bilateral relations on ground firmer than the quicksand of 'balance of power'," he said.

That was a reference to a view in New Delhi that looks at Japan as a hedge against a rising China.

BOOSTING TRADE, MILITARY TIES


Trade, analysts say, is one way of cementing that partnership underscored by closer recent military ties and Japanese support for last year's landmark U.S.-India civilian nuclear deal.

"The two sides...are in the process of concluding discussing a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA)," said India's foreign ministry spokesman, Vishnu Prakash. Twelve rounds of talks on the agreement had already taken place, he said.

Japan is India's sixth largest investor. Bilateral trade, more than $12 billion in 2008-09, is targetted to climb to $20 billion by next year.

Hatoyama's talks in India could also focus on on climate change policies -- with the two countries on opposite sides of the debate, particularly on expanding the scope of Japanese support for renewable energy projects in India.

Indian officials said the sides would also discuss Japan's offer to train former Taliban fighters as part of a $5 billion Japanese aid package for Afghanistan. India remains uncomfortable about co-opting the Taliban into any power structures in Kabul.

Hatoyama's government will likely seek to present the visit as a success as domestic criticism rises. Last week he approved a record trillion dollar budget, which will further inflate Japan's massive debt as the government struggles with the weak economy.

Japanese voters are also expressing growing doubts about Hatoyama's ability to make tough foreign policy decisions, and the arrest of two former aides has spurred calls for more explanation of a scandal over false political funding records.
 
Last edited:
. . .
We should try to industrial corporation in electronic items from Japan.
 
. .
Hey men, whats wrong with my news ? Thats certainly a main

concern from the Japanese side regarding further defence tie with

India. :smitten::pakistan::china:

There is nothing wrong in your news, everyone including me read it in the morning.
What I meant was, you loose no opportunity. The moment any positive news about India comes, you are there.
 
.
There is nothing wrong in your news, everyone including me read it in the morning.
What I meant was, you loose no opportunity. The moment any positive news about India comes, you are there.

What's wrong with India sign the comprehensive test ban treaty. It only stop a country from further testing nukes. Does mean that India has to give up nukes.
 
.
What's wrong with India sign the comprehensive test ban treaty. It only stop a country from further testing nukes. Does mean that India has to give up nukes.
You can create nuclear weapons but you can't test it. I cannot understand the logic.
 
.
You can create nuclear weapons but you can't test it. I cannot understand the logic.

There are other ways of verifying the nuclear weapon besides testing it. US, Russia and others do it that way.
 
.
There are other ways of verifying the nuclear weapon besides testing it. US, Russia and others do it that way.

US, Russia, China all tested nuclear weapons as many times as they wanted in the past. They got everything they needed. So now they can sign any treaty and hence stop others from doing any tests.

The treaty came to existence only in 1996. After all the security council nations satisfied with their nuclear tests. China and France continued this until 1996. Then only they signed it. Also US and China just signed it not ratified it.

How reliable the other method you mentioned. None can match the actual one. Simulation tests doing in supercomputer are just simulations.
 
.
US, Russia, China all tested nuclear weapons as many times as they wanted in the past. They got everything they needed. So now they can sign any treaty and hence stop others from doing any tests.

The treaty came to existence only in 1996. After all the security council nations satisfied with their nuclear tests. China and France continued this until 1996. Then only they signed it. Also US and China just signed it not ratified it.

How reliable the other method you mentioned. None can match the actual one. Simulation tests doing in supercomputer are just simulations.

The past is the past. what other countries did in the past belong to a time period when the world was more dangerous. Now, in this modern age, there is no more need for more testing or for countries to develop more atomic weapon. There are enough countries in the world with nuclear weapons to make the world not as safe.
 
.
The past is the past. what other countries did in the past belong to a time period when the world was more dangerous. Now, in this modern age, there is no more need for more testing or for countries to develop more atomic weapon. There are enough countries in the world with nuclear weapons to make the world not as safe.

Then the condition should be to destroy all the nuclear weapons rather than stopping the tests. It is absolutely unfair for some contries to have nuclear weapons and some not. This is what india is proposing.......
 
.
The past is the past. what other countries did in the past belong to a time period when the world was more dangerous. Now, in this modern age, there is no more need for more testing or for countries to develop more atomic weapon. There are enough countries in the world with nuclear weapons to make the world not as safe.

Hmm . PAst is the past is it
What about the future.

Whats the point of this treaty.

Its a hypocritical system designed to limit the use of Nuclear weapons. Instead of striving to the prospect of a Planetary civilization when we had acquired the power to decimate the entire planet. We sought to Control and limit the Power of the atom. between the most powerful. until we find a way of countering Nuclear weapons. Then people just wont care that much.

Looking ahead the prospects are not that great. WMD are here to stay.

20 years form now. We all start testing halfium bombs.(the Us is already close to acquiring this capability)

20 years latter Anti matter bombs

20 years latter Nano tech warheads.

You think i must be insane. But i could well be underestimating the time frame.

Only a planetary civilization can ever truly, control such power weapons.
 
Last edited:
.
India will not sign the NPT or the CTBT because it effectively means nuclear apartheid. Disbanding these treaties and banning nuclear weapons altogether is the only way to go forward.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom