What's new

Japan has been in line for more than 20 years

.
Yes.

Ask any Chinese person who they would prefer on the UNSC, Japan or India.

If Japan tries for the UNSC they will be vetoed. Nothing against the Japanese people in particular, but the Japanese government is essentially in the pocket of the USA. Combine that with anger over historical war crimes, and you've got a recipe for disaster.

buddy, if japanese are in pocket of USA, indians are pretty much close to the willy of USA, imagine weak amreki japan with a nuclear indian getting nukes each day by americans, presently our nukes can counter them, but imagine, their nukes reaching counts of russians

i consider japanese govt though being in heart of USA to be very responsible and mature, as compared to unprofessional and immature indian govt
 
.
And then you wonder why Indians are paranoid about China.

Because of China's presence, it prevents India to annex its neignbors like Pakistan/Bangladesh/Sri Lanka/Nepal/Bhutan which is against their wish.

This is a good balanced of power in Asia. :tup:
 
Last edited:
.
buddy, if japanese are in pocket of USA, indians are pretty much close to the willy of USA, imagine weak amreki japan with a nuclear indian getting nukes each day by americans, presently our nukes can counter them, but imagine, their nukes reaching counts of russians

Wow your posts are getting even stranger...

And no. Read the article in the OP, this quote in particular:

India voted 11% of the time with the United States on issues important to the U.S. while Japan voted 86% of the time with the U.S.

It's clearly obvious what Japan will do with a permanent seat, they will just support whatever America wants.
 
.
Because of China's presence, it prevents India to annex its neignbors like Pakistan/Bengladesh/Sri Lanka/Nepal/Bhutan which is against their wish.

This is a good balanced of power in Asia. :tup:

If India wanted to annex its neighbors, we would have done so long ago. We had numerous opportunities: 1971 war, Tamil insurgency in Sri Lanka, anti-monarchy revolution in Nepal...
 
.
If India wanted to annex its neighbors, we would have done so long ago. We had numerous opportunities: 1971 war, Tamil insurgency in Sri Lanka, anti-monarchy revolution in Nepal...

Because many of them still afraid that India as a sole regional Superpower would abuse its power, so they believe the existence of both China and India is a good thing.
 
.
Because many of them still afraid that India as a sole regional Superpower would abuse its power, so they believe the existence of both China and India is a good thing.

The problem is, the Indian leadership is starting to increasingly see South Asia as its own backyard (and about time too). Would you be alright if India starts giving billions of dollars worth of military equipment to Taiwan, publicly supports Uighur seperatists, and claims parts of Tibet as its own territory? Well, that's the effect that China's policies are having on India, and unless both countries adopt the "I won't touch yours, you don't touch mine" approach, the future of Sino-Indian relations seems rather bleak. Which is unfortunate, because I would love to see China and India become allies.
 
.
The problem is, the Indian leadership is starting to increasingly see South Asia as its own backyard (and about time too). Would you be alright if India starts giving billions of dollars worth of military equipment to Taiwan, publicly supports Uighur seperatists, and claims parts of Tibet as its own territory? Well, that's the effect that China's policies are having on India, and unless both countries adopt the "I won't touch yours, you don't touch mine" approach, the future of Sino-Indian relations seems rather bleak. Which is unfortunate, because I would love to see China and India become allies.

Xinjiang and Tibet are legitimate Chinese territories, but other South Asian coutries aren't India's legitimate territories. :hitwall:

China didn't launch any Anti-India campaign, we merely make free trade and help them to lift their economy. What's wrong with that? :hitwall:

If Pakistan/Bangladesh/Sri Lanka/Nepal/Bhutan are all willing to unify with India, then i don't see that China has any reason to intervene it. :yahoo:
 
.
The problem is, the Indian leadership is starting to increasingly see South Asia as its own backyard (and about time too). Would you be alright if India starts giving billions of dollars worth of military equipment to Taiwan, publicly supports Uighur seperatists, and claims parts of Tibet as its own territory? Well, that's the effect that China's policies are having on India, and unless both countries adopt the "I won't touch yours, you don't touch mine" approach, the future of Sino-Indian relations seems rather bleak. Which is unfortunate, because I would love to see China and India become allies.

These Chinese political actions regarding India, are simply a geopolitical means to counter the fact that India hosts the Tibetan government in exile. This is seen as a "political chip" that might be used in the future.

I admit that there is absolutely no evidence of India helping any separatist movements in China, but still we need to hedge against risk.

We don't know which political party will next be voted into the Indian government, and what their stance on Tibet might be. For all we know, the next Indian government could decide to start using the Tibetan government in exile against us, though I think it is very unlikely.

The situation now is fairly balanced, so I think cooperation is still the optimum solution here. The more communication there is, the better we will all get along. :tup:
 
.
As long as China is existed, India won't be the sole regional Superpower that bullies its neighbors.

Lol... As long as you don't poke your nose south of Himalayas we don't care who you bully in the rest of Asia.


P.S. I know you didn't mean it but the sentence u wrote reads as if you guys also want to join India in bullying other nations. Just having some fun. :cheers:
 
. .
Lol... As long as you don't poke your nose south of Himalayas we don't care who you bully in the rest of Asia.


P.S. I know you didn't mean it but the sentence u wrote reads as if you guys also want to join India in bullying other nations. Just having some fun. :cheers:

China didn't abuse any of its power, we simply love free trade. :welcome:
 
.
buddy, if japanese are in pocket of USA, indians are pretty much close to the willy of USA, imagine weak amreki japan with a nuclear indian getting nukes each day by americans, presently our nukes can counter them, but imagine, their nukes reaching counts of russians

i consider japanese govt though being in heart of USA to be very responsible and mature, as compared to unprofessional and immature indian govt

If you want Chinese support for Pakistan's policies, it's best that you not raise Japan over any other nation.
 
.
Xinjiang and Tibet are legitimate Chinese territories, but other South Asian coutries aren't India's legitimate territories. :hitwall:

Before 1947, India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh were all one country, while Xinjiang and Tibet only became de facto part of China in the 50s.

China didn't launch any Anti-India campaign, we merely make free trade and help them to lift their economy. What's wrong with that? :hitwall:

Are you serious?

If Pakistan/Bangladesh/Sri Lanka/Nepal/Bhutan are all willing to unify with India, then i don't see that China has any reason to intervene it. :yahoo:

Even if Pakistan or Bangladesh wanted to unite with us, we wouldn't accept them for numerous reasons.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom