Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At the best one was fine but why the second one begs the question? By the way where is the proof ?During world war 2, Japan had 80,000 suicide/kamakazi pilots but Japan was not surrendering so USA dropped 2 nuclear bombs on Japan which ended the war.
Nukes were first considered "really big bombs", and the word "Weapon of Mass Destruction" wasn't invented after they had been used. It was not ok for USA to drop nukes, yet was it ok for week long bombing missions with much higher casuality and structure destruction? I don't think we should push our standards on past events. Yes, USA was wrong dropping nukes, yet not that wrong for us to convict mordern USA for the past.At the best one was fine but why the second one begs the question? By the way where is the proof ?
Nuking japan is an action with out any solid logical reasoning. It seems more that US wanted to use japan as guinea pig for nukes.
At the best one was fine but why the second one begs the question? By the way where is the proof ?
Nuking japan is an action with out any solid logical reasoning. It seems more that US wanted to use japan as guinea pig for nukes.
Japanese were not ready to surrender. In fact, they are ready to defend every inch of Japan mainland. You shall go read more history of Pacific war. Ask yourself this simple question why 2 A bomb is needed to make Japan surrender with the fact of 3 days gap between dropping of each bomb. Japanese resolution not to surrender is strong. But Japan Emperor decide enough is enough and order all Japanese to lay down weapon after US demonstrated they have the abilities to wipe out whole Japan w/o too much US casualties.Why storm the country when tey are ready to surrender?