What's new

Japan gets contract to build strategeic roads on Indo-China border

Dada ekhane onek Bangali member ache.Skull and Bones dada,Griffin dada,Austerlitz,Scorpionx dada,Dray dada,Sandy dada,Kbd Raaf dada etc,ei koyak jon ke ami chini karon era sob purono members.Echara o onek notun member o ache.Amar mone hoy Banglay PDF dine dine khub famous hochche tai eto member asche ekhane:D
mane bascially amra sob jaigai achi :P PDF will soon become Bangali Addar Forum :P
 
mane bascially amra sob jaigai achi :P PDF will soon become Bangali Addar Forum :P
Yup we are all over the place.Anyways no more Bengali conversation in this thread as our non-Bengali compatriots are feeling a little uncomfortable at this:p:
 
To the esteemed Indian colleagues,

I have a question regarding the Indian Defense Posture in Northeast India. What is the force capabilities of the Indian Army and Air Force for the defense of Northeast India ? What is the strength number? Thanks, guys.

The strength number got to be the magic 81.
 
Good. Now BRO will be less burdened. Not to forget the expertise Japanese bring in.
 
India's long-claimed "non-alliance" national policy is a myth.

Weak slave nations never have so -called "independent" foreign policies.

Normally weaker nations only have 1 master : e.g. Japan's master is the US, which is also the master of S Korea,etc.

India has masked itself as "doesn't have a master"on the surface.

Yes. it is right that India hasn't have 1 master, because it has have multiple masters!


In the Cold War era, India's behind-door masters were the Soviet and the US at the same time.

In today's world, India's behind-door masters are the US, the Ruskies, China, and now Japan.


The strategy of the magic 81s has always been using 1 master to go against the order of another master, in order to get its best benefit while deliberately disguising serving no single master on the surface.

The guy who coined the phrase "a 2-timey slave" needs to rethink. :rofl:
 
LOL thats called irony,Modi government gave contract to JICA/Japanese to build border roads near china border.:D
 
That's what i said, the 'chicken neck' fallacy is only taken by the people who's understanding of geopolitical issues is only limited to 'looking at the map'.

Some not even that. I have schooled a Chinese think tank in this thread.

China's rising interest in Nepal, keen to develop districts adjoining Tibet | Page 3


It's not beyond them to attempt it. If you read my post #39 you will come to understand that their military in the sense the top brass has no responsibility to the footsoldiers. So if they send in enough men, perhaps they can take over NE. Remember, we are talking about millions of people they are ready to sacrifice for their goal.

China has 2 million soldiers. Given that India is not China's primary enemy, it would call quits after suffering 4-5000 dead.
 
India's long-claimed "non-alliance" national policy is a myth.

Weak slave nations never have so -called "independent" foreign policies.

Normally weaker nations only have 1 master : e.g. Japan's master is the US, which is also the master of S Korea,etc.

India has masked itself as "doesn't have a master"on the surface.

Yes. it is right that India hasn't have 1 master, because it has have multiple masters!


In the Cold War era, India's behind-door masters were the Soviet and the US at the same time.

In today's world, India's behind-door masters are the US, the Ruskies, China, and now Japan.


The strategy of the magic 81s has always been using 1 master to go against the order of another master, in order to get its best benefit while deliberately disguising serving no single master on the surface.

The guy who coined the phrase "a 2-timey slave" needs to rethink. :rofl:

Where is my ''Keep calm and salute this chutiya'' poster when I need it?
 
Way to go GOI. A strong message to the Chinese, Infra for our NE, stronger bhai bhai with japani - - win win :)
 
Last edited:
The overstretched Border Road Organisation (BRO) has been taken off from building and maintaining 40 per cent of the roads falling under its jurisdiction. Japanese have been given the job to make strategic roads, mostly bordering China. In a meeting with Japan International Corporation Agency (JICA) held late last week, India has agreed to give about 2,000 kilometres of road along the Chinese border to JICA. JICA will be providing financial assistance as well as technical expertise to construct and improvise the roads.

BRO has about 5,000 km of road under its supervision. Situated mostly along the North Eastern states and Uttarakhand, these roads are of strategetic importance to India. Improving NH 39 between Imphal and Kohima, roads between Maram and Dimapur and Ukhrul and Tadubi in Manipur, Shillong and Dauki and construction of Dauki bridge in Meghalaya are some of the projects that JICA will be undertaking. Barring Arunachal Pradesh, border roads along all the other North East states will be done by JICA. The decision of taking away some of the border roads from the BRO has been doing round of the corridors of power in the transport ministry for more than a year now. Last year, the ministry had decided to give some of the roads to PWD.
However, the deal could not be finalised then. Now with Japan sharing its expertise on building bridges, tunnels and constructing roads on hilly region, it will build about 2,000 kilometres of roads along the border, some of which are also strategetic roads for India. “The Japanese agency has suggested to us that instead of just laying roads, the roads on the hills should have more bridges and tunnels. That makes them withstand any natural and human calamity.

We are exploring those options,” said an officer of the ministry. The ministry is also of the view that BRO is overburdened and needs to share its roads work. “BRO is a part of transport ministry and is involved in building and maintaining national highways. JICA will help ease out BRO’s burden,” added the officer. The road has also been taken away from BRO, because the Japanese government policy does not permit the country to take up any project in another country which involves working with armed forces. “If roads continue to be with BRO, then we will not get technical and financial assistance from Japan. The road is only being taken away temporarily. It will be handed over to BRO after the completion of work,” added the officer.

Copied from idrw.org http://idrw.org/?p=46233 | idrw.org

If it had included Arunachal Pradesh , then it's worth it's money..
I feel disappointed ..
Japanese are soft paddlers I see..

If Arunachal is not involved , where does the indo china border comes?o_O

Just media works ?:o:
 
Last edited:

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom