On top of that you are disingenuous by ignoring my previous point.
I did not ever say put 1.8 ton UAV onto a single pylon, never ever ever.
What I stated that four pylons could carry such, that means use all of them.
you can't put a single uav or missiles on two pylons , those pylons won't get released at the same time, if you put them on two pylon , one will get released and after a small time the other will be released . ddon't forget they designed for A2A missile not bombs m the pilot had to release them one by one
as a result if you do what you want to do you just damage the aircroft and the drone as the drone simply tilt and hit aircraft body .
But you have to ignore that as too when I stated a specialized mount is needed.
that specialized mount is not answer , if you want to do that , you had to change all the pylon and release mechanism of F-14
As for Jahesh-700, its maximum or optimal thrust would be needed for a 1.8 ton UAV.
and you still didn't said what the role of that UAV will be. that engine core is nearly as wide as J-85 , the diameter of that drone will be at least 6ocm if the wings all are folded completely if not it even be wider.and as i said there be no space . your big drone is better to be launched from ground , launching it from air crafts is useless , pointless , problematic and just making unnecessary problems
F-14 can carry up to four of Mk-84 bombs on its center line hard points / pylons.
no it can carry 4 on its belly , 2 on its wing glove and two sidewinder beside those two under wing glove, but in separate pylons and the size is important
MK-84 is 45cm wide and 328cm long . your UAV is clearly longer and wider than those numbers. .
That is 3.7 tons of weight total that center line of F-14 could handle at most.
no it actually can handle a little more than 4 tons of weight ,a but it has nothing to do with argument , the weight on each pylon and the size is what is important . not the total weight
Do not ignore that I stated specialized mount would be needed for a UAV.
Or whenever a air launched land attack cruise missile is ever mounted.
and that is not the role of F-14 , it has no equipment for targeytting ground units and those special mount wont help , it help if you want for example add russian bombs or missiles that are not compatible with american design or you want to yuse 3-4 sdm instead of one MK-84. you can't add a specialized mount and add a missile or uav that is out of spec , in fact by doing so you made the situation worse because those pylons not only have to carry those out of spec bombs but also those specialized mount.
you think how heavy a mount that can tolerate 1.5ton of weaponry would be?
Basic Kh-55 is 6.4 meters long while two AIM-54 total at 7.8 meters.
Accounting spacing between AIM-54's and its roughly 9 meters.
what nonsense is that 9m . who told you there is 9m of space there
this is F-14 underbelly
the body of the missile is 38cm wide and 3.8m long the spacing is not even 0.5m
at most you have 8m but its not important as those pylons are not synced if you put your drone there is its clear that distance between engine and the missile is not even 20cm , its what that make problem
All you do is yet again demonstrate that you have no argument.
thats what you do , every single of your argument answered and the problem with them are shown.
the airplane simply is not designed for that role , what you suggest not only add non to its capability , but reduce from them . and your suggestion have no actual use , you want to use cruise missile , use a bomber like Su-21, Su-24 or F-4 or J-7 for the role why damage the interceptor .
you want release such big drones , well launch them from ground , there is no need to launch them from sky .