Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He thinks that the carrier-based 5th gen fighter might fly by the end of 2019.两年 ,又是各种惊喜,什么固定翼舰载预警机 弹射航母 四代舰载机(19年底有可能首飞)都是这两年,18 19 两个好年份。
舰载预警机这两年飞(一年多点)。
主要是歼20上的信息感知和数据共享能力(这一块代表了新的空战战术理念 需要长期的空战演练和技术改进 )。
四代舰载机也是这两年飞。
no pb is not "reliable"````he just works on AC and collecting data, and sometimes be gone for few months on high seas without popping up in any domestic forums```````
Cross-post from SDF
Does anybody know if the blogger "pb19980515" is a reliable insider or poster? Does he have a track record of giving relatively credible information?
He apparently divulged some information regarding the PLAN's next-generation carrier-based fighter & KJ-600.
From an October 2017 post:
He thinks that the carrier-based 5th gen fighter might fly by the end of 2019.
A more recent claim that the KJ-600 will fly in approximately in a year or so:
Something regarding the J-20 and its network centric warfare capabilities (can somebody translate this portion accurately?):
Another recent claim that the carrier-based 5th generation fighter will fly these two years (2018 and 2019, presumably):
Anybody know this guy? Or provide a more accurate translation of the below thread (where the information comes from)?
https://lt.cjdby.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2416270
frankly too much speculation. of course a carrier base 5th gen fighter to be ready in 2 years would have to be the J-31 but I have my doubts.
frankly too much speculation. of course a carrier base 5th gen fighter to be ready in 2 years would have to be the J-31 but I have my doubts.
Could be a J-20 navy version.
Highly unlikely, at least according to open opinion. There is also no hint or evidence of a naval J-20 under development whereas there is of a FC-31-based carrier variant.
I'm curious. Can J-20 converted to a carrier based fighter? If it can, what does J-20 need to do so?
Sure, it can, but it doesn't mean it'll be effective (or more so than the FC-31) at the job, which will require low-speed handling abilities. They would need to increase its wingspan, possibly make modifications to the location of the canards (requiring essentially a complete airframe redesign), add catapult-capable landing gear, and folding wings.
Even if I agree with you, exactly the same changes will be required for any naval capable FC-31.... so if it fits better, if these changes are less demanding and the result is then easier to archive than converting a J-20 remains to be seen. And if that alleged FC-31V3 is indeed even enlarged, it it is even more a new aircraft; at least more than a J-20-based design.
Deino
There is no such thing as J-31 on China's future CV, actually there is no such thing as J-31 since PLA still refuse to fund or officially support this SAC's failed attemp at 5gen fighter.
Btw, there are rumors that the CCP/PLA become so disappointment about SAC to the degree they want to setup a new fighter manufaturer elsewhere, and by putting Yang Wei at a higher position (standing memeber of central committe) than the leader of AVIC also show the rumor could has some creditablity.
So far, A modified J-20 is possible, but NAVY may want their own type of stealth fighter as well.
My understanding is that the PLAN wants a medium-sized heavyweight 5th generation fighter, and the contenders are 601 and 611. The 601 institute is presenting a navalized 3.0 version of the FC-31 while we don't know what 611 is developing.
How close is this to the information you have?
Do we have any updates on the PLAN 5th generation fighter program? I've been hearing that it's a competition between SAC & CAC (FC-31 vs a J-20 variant?). When can we expect the results to come out?
what do you say about the hidden CAC another 5th gen fighter ..... what was its name j-14 or something like that ?????
wasn't it FC-31 vs j-14 ????
View attachment 451457 View attachment 451458
View attachment 451459
What is J-14, is it real?