What's new

J&K: Jawan killed in ceasefire violation by Pakistan, another found dead with bullet wounds

Samaa is no major news channel and that 27 death figure never got acceptance anywhere except frustrated bharati youth on internet.

My link confirms that attackers had support from Pak army and hence those 5 deaths would also be counted.



Ask what is wrong with bharatis. Idiots are talking about "score" on a thread related to death of their soldier.

This shows importance of Indian soldier life for his own compatriots. No wonder they commit suicide or whine on social media.
SAMAA is in top 5-6 news channels in Pakistan.

Also since the attacker's including the killed ones were militants so they are not part of border score.
 
.
SAMAA is in top 5-6 news channels in Pakistan.

Also since the attacker's including the killed ones were militants so they are not part of border score.

But still its fake news from a random programs wasn't given any importance by any other channel or ISPR. Shows the news had no worth for anyone except bharatis.

Indian army doesn't agree with you and says BAT was working with support from Pak army. SO 8 dead and not 13.
 
. . .
But still its fake news from a random programs wasn't given any importance by any other channel or ISPR. Shows the news had no worth for anyone except bharatis.

Indian army doesn't agree with you and says BAT was working with support from Pak army. SO 8 dead and not 13.
If it was fake news it would have been refuted by ISPR.

Indian Army never said BAT attackers were from Pakistan Army.

Indians counting the score is funny. Indians have lost lot more soldiers at LOC than us. In past few years when ever India has killed one of our they have lost on average 5 to 6 soldiers in coming weeks.
Actually Pakistan has lost more soldiers than us every year.
For example ISPR Shuhada list shows 81 Pakistan Army personnel killed in Kashmir border between 2003-Feb 2011 whereas Indian Army & BSF lost only 58 in the same period.
 
. .
If it was fake news it would have been refuted by ISPR.

Indian Army never said BAT attackers were from Pakistan Army.


Actually Pakistan has lost more soldiers than us every year.
For example ISPR Shuhada list shows 81 Pakistan Army personnel killed in Kashmir border between 2003-Feb 2011 whereas Indian Army & BSF lost only 58 in the same period.
Since you are adamant to stick measuring, allow me to enlighten you, by it's own admission,India has lost over 4500 soldiers to Pakistani firing since 2001....which is an average of 25 death each month.

Ceasefire Violations Along LoC Have Claimed The Lives Of Over 4,500 Soldiers Since 2001, An RTI Reveals
KUNAL ANAND
NOVEMBER 07, 2016
5.7K SHARES

Responding to a Right to Information (RTI) filed in September, the Indian army said over 4,500 soldiers had lost their lives to ceasefire violations along the Line of Control (LoC).

1_1478519697_725x725.jpg


The RTI was filed by Vadodara-based activist Pankaj Darve.

The reply to the RTI application, filed on September 22, is dated October 26 and signed by CPIO (Central Public Information Officer). After the Kargil conflict, 4675 soldiers died along the LoC due to ceasefire violations by Pakistan.
 
.
Since you are adamant to stick measuring, allow me to enlighten you, by it's own admission,India has lost over 4500 soldiers to Pakistani firing since 2001....which is an average of 25 death each month.

Ceasefire Violations Along LoC Have Claimed The Lives Of Over 4,500 Soldiers Since 2001, An RTI Reveals
KUNAL ANAND
NOVEMBER 07, 2016
5.7K SHARES

Responding to a Right to Information (RTI) filed in September, the Indian army said over 4,500 soldiers had lost their lives to ceasefire violations along the Line of Control (LoC).

1_1478519697_725x725.jpg


The RTI was filed by Vadodara-based activist Pankaj Darve.

The reply to the RTI application, filed on September 22, is dated October 26 and signed by CPIO (Central Public Information Officer). After the Kargil conflict, 4675 soldiers died along the LoC due to ceasefire violations by Pakistan.
Actually it's only 144 incl BSF since 2002:

169 civilians, 144 security men killed in border firing
Over 8000 AK rifles, 20,158 grenades recovered
Posted on 29/06/2016 by Dailyexcelsior
Adil Lateef
SRINAGAR, June 28: Government today said 313 persons including 169 civilians and 144 security men were killed in cross border shelling in the State since year 2002.

http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/169-civilians-144-security-men-killed-border-firing/
 
.
If it was fake news it would have been refuted by ISPR.

Indian Army never said BAT attackers were from Pakistan Army.


Actually Pakistan has lost more soldiers than us every year.
For example ISPR Shuhada list shows 81 Pakistan Army personnel killed in Kashmir border between 2003-Feb 2011 whereas Indian Army & BSF lost only 58 in the same period.
You in past 15 years have lost 4500 soldiers we have lost really few so kid grow up and get your numbers right
 
. .
Actually it's only 144 incl BSF since 2002:

169 civilians, 144 security men killed in border firing
Over 8000 AK rifles, 20,158 grenades recovered
Posted on 29/06/2016 by Dailyexcelsior
Adil Lateef
SRINAGAR, June 28: Government today said 313 persons including 169 civilians and 144 security men were killed in cross border shelling in the State since year 2002.

http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/169-civilians-144-security-men-killed-border-firing/
I think some thing like Indian Express is more authentic than some local paper, besides all the sources that reported the 4500 figure remain on the record with none of them retracting the news.

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...ng-loc-in-pak-firing-since-2001-army-3738096/
 
.
SAMAA is in top 5-6 news channels in Pakistan.

Also since the attacker's including the killed ones were militants so they are not part of border score.

Samaa is actually the most watched news channel in Pak according to a recent study. Which just proves Areesh's point. They are one of the most sensationalist channel whose majority of news turns out fake and unverifiable as they are running only after ratings. The channel enjoys a very dubious reputation in Pak by serious news followers.
 
.
If it was fake news it would have been refuted by ISPR.

Indian Army never said BAT attackers were from Pakistan Army.

It had no importance hence was never even considered for rejection.

Indian army said BAT were supported directly by Pak army.
 
.
It had no importance hence was never even considered for rejection.

Indian army said BAT were supported directly by Pak army.
It was true hence it was never rejected.

But the BAT attackers were not themselves from Pak army.

Samaa is actually the most watched news channel in Pak according to a recent study. Which just proves Areesh's point. They are one of the most sensationalist channel whose majority of news turns out fake and unverifiable as they are running only after ratings. The channel enjoys a very dubious reputation in Pak by serious news followers.
SAMAA figures were confirmed as durust by Defence minister.
 
.
It was true hence it was never rejected.

But the BAT attackers were not themselves from Pak army.

It was fake hence never considered for rejection.

But BAT was supported directly by Pak army.

@Windjammer @waz @The Eagle Gregory Celgone/Praise Kek/Armored Division/Vengeful One/Director General is back with another fake account. Just telling you guys. :lol:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom