'I've been raped 30 times and it's not even lunchtime'

[Harisudan]

Depends on who is judging the mistakes. I dont see you as having ANY qualifications to judge a mistake.

@Oscar , He may not be the one qualified enough to Judge it, but does it make you authorised enough to say otherwise..Can u say that Sharia treats everybody equal???
can u defend sharia openly???

 

[Jayanta]

Depends on who is judging the mistakes. I dont see you as having ANY qualifications to judge a mistake.

There you go.....there lies the difference.

 

[bloo]

someone kill them already

 

[Jayanta]

@Oscar , He may not be the one qualified enough to Judge it, but does it make you authorised enough to say otherwise..Can u say that Sharia treats everybody equal???
can u defend sharia openly???

You cannot point anything wrong there...if you do. That is blasphemy .... punishable by death. Thereby ruling out any discussion whether it is right or wrong to stone a women to death.

 

[ranjeet]

Where did I say that?

I didnt know quoting the Quran as it is meant it needs to be edited?

Was when slavery was normal and nowhere does it say rape them....It clearly says
Source: 'I've been raped 30 times and it's not even lunchtime' | Page 4

You said when slavery was normal, and Quran does talk about Slave girls in the verse you quoted. Since slavery is not normal now it must mean either this verse needs some revision or Slavery is still normal.

 

[Dubious]

@Oscar , He may not be the one qualified enough to Judge it, but does it make you authorised enough to say otherwise..Can u say that Sharia treats everybody equal???
can u defend sharia openly???

I can...whats your question?

 

[SarthakGanguly]

I can...whats your question?

Let's not discuss religion now.

Your avatar is cute.

 

[Dubious]

Was when slavery was normal and nowhere does it say rape them....It clearly says
Source: 'I've been raped 30 times and it's not even lunchtime' | Page 4

You said when slavery was normal, and Quran does talk about Slave girls in the verse you quoted. Since slavery is not normal now it must mean either this verse needs some revision or Slavery is still normal.

There are some laws in the Quran that were for that time...It is clearly distinguished because Arabic is a language which actually puts a temporal context to a sentence! So we have verses for when slavery was normal....

As for the latter part of your post....

We also have verses which says give the slave their rights (when you give a slave any rights...they are no longer slaves...why? Coz slaves dont have a single right)

And the verse which you quoted...Did you understand it? THAT was the verse which was telling what I just said...giving the slave rights....in fact a nikkah and haq mahr - rights of a wife!

But let them who find not [the means for] marriage abstain [from sexual relations] until Allah enriches them from His bounty. And those who seek a contract [for eventual emancipation] from among whom your right hands possess - then make a contract with them if you know there is within them goodness and give them from the wealth of Allah which He has given you. And do not compel your slave girls to prostitution, if they desire chastity, to seek [thereby] the temporary interests of worldly life. And if someone should compel them, then indeed, Allah is [to them], after their compulsion, Forgiving and Merciful.
Quran (24:33)

Instead of saying down right no slaves allowed...we have many verses where slaves are given rights...and many verses where it asks the man to ponder on the signs....now if you cant add 2 and 2 something is def wrong with you (you in general not aiming at anyone)!

Let's not discuss religion now.

Your avatar is cute.

Thanks!

 

[The SiLent crY]

Time for Arab puppets + Turkey to clap for their freedom fighters who are secretly supported to change middle east shape but bombed at the same time .

One thinking about weakening pagan , grave worshiper shias and the other dreaming for great Ottoman empire .

 

[ranjeet]

There are some laws in the Quran that were for that time...It is clearly distinguished because Arabic is a language which actually puts a temporal context to a sentence! So we have verses for when slavery was normal....

As for the latter part of your post....

We also have verses which says give the slave their rights (when you give a slave any rights...they are no longer slaves...why? Coz slaves dont have a single right)

And the verse which you quoted...Did you understand it? THAT was the verse which was telling what I just said...giving the slave rights....in fact a nikkah and haq mahr - rights of a wife!

Only if everyone could make that differentiation about verses being for a certain time period. Before misusing it further their own agendas.

 

[Dubious]

Only if everyone could make that differentiation about verses being for a certain time period. Before misusing it further their own agendas.

That is also why I keep saying someone go read the god damn open letter by the scholars....its in details about every verse pulled out of context! And also why CONTEXT is very important!

 

[ranjeet]

That is also why I keep saying someone go read the god damn open letter by the scholars....its in details about every verse pulled out of context! And also why CONTEXT is very important!

When average Muslim doesn't bother to do it expecting non Muslims to do it asking for too much. Anyway lets not derail from the topic at hand.

 

[SQ8]

@Oscar , He may not be the one qualified enough to Judge it, but does it make you authorised enough to say otherwise..Can u say that Sharia treats everybody equal???
can u defend sharia openly???

Actually, the Shariah guidelines do. Its how they are interpreted is what matters.
I can defend the need to repay in kind openly quite confidently.. the same way one can defend the chopping off a hand.

You cannot point anything wrong there...if you do. That is blasphemy .... punishable by death. Thereby ruling out any discussion whether it is right or wrong to stone a women to death.

Again, YOUR flawed and bigoted understanding. Anyone has the right to ask why a particular clause in the current implementation of Sharia exists and deserves an explanation for it. If they feel that it is unjust, they can request a review of it by scholars.

AS I said before, your initial approach was ignoramus and bigotry, hence you are not one to be convinced due to your own previously reached preset mindset about hating the religion. Its like trying to convince hitler that other races deserved more..he was convinced he was superior so anything beyond that is futile. In your case, you are convinced that Islam is horrid and so anything beyond that is pointless.

 

[Dubious]

When average Muslim doesn't bother to do it expecting non Muslims to do it asking for too much. Anyway lets not derail from the topic at hand.

Well that is a fault now isnt it...

Of the average Muslim maybe...def not of the law but of the individual, right? Now if the average non Muslim follows the same path (of not bothering the same)...then it is still not the fault of the Law but the average Non Muslim who walked down the same path (when internet is at your finger tips) ...it kinda destroys the average Non Muslim´s rights to point a finger at the average Muslim...when both are doing the same mistake and making the law the escape sheep

 

[bitter_truth]

The articles in post 1 is about a protest in London....

I am talking about that....Why is there no protest in Pakistan or India is prob coz we have a million other problems soaring on our own heads...Dont know about India but Pakistan army is still busy in numerous terrorist hunting parties...and not to forget other political instability due to a stubborn PM! Price hikes, loadshedding, inflation are just a few to mention!

where had these problems gone while protesting against Israel?