What's new

It’s Official: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition

.

Journal's job is to publish, not to carryout research work.
Above (published) verdict is not of the journal but is a research of ESI (European Scientific Institute) http://euinstitute.net/
You need to counter the technical arguments of the experts, involved in the research.
Indians should setup a panel to counter those researchers, trolling here is not enough.
If Indians are not happy, they should sue the journal or the researchers, rather than misleading Pakistanis.
 
Last edited:
.
Hi,

Young man---it does not make any difference---if it was a controlled demolition or a fake stunt or a fraud or a deception---.

The main issue was that a christian army was going to invade a muslim nation---what did you do to stop that invasion---.
Hello Sir,
Firstly, we are not those kind of Muslims which Dr. Iqbal has defined, which is true definition of a Muslim.
Secondly, US approached Pakistan and Islamic world by linking them with demolition of twin tower.
No way any Muslim state would dare not co-operate in apprehension of culprits, and all trust was entrusted upon USA's claim of having evidence.
However Musharraf did demanded evidence, whereupon they re-approach him with statements like ''are you with us or against us''.
It was a clever plot, and history is full of such plots being laid around Muslims.
Invasion of Afghanistan was another one of those treacherous plot!
We realized it after it was too late, Musharraf sensed it earliest and laid foundation of modernizing armed forces.
No world power can fight Pakistan one on one, they will look for Mir Jaffars among us.
As a response, Islamic states are getting united, perhaps already sharing intel.
In short, game is ON.
 
.
When did that happen?

Its like kids crying that a bigger kid took their candy.

Tag the moon is fake and its just a laser projection guy
 
.
Hello Sir,
Firstly, we are not those kind of Muslims which Dr. Iqbal has defined, which is true definition of a Muslim.
Secondly, US approached Pakistan and Islamic world by linking them with demolition of twin tower.
No way any Muslim state would dare not co-operate in apprehension of culprits, and all trust was entrusted upon USA's claim of having evidence.
However Musharraf did demanded evidence, whereupon they re-approach him with statements like ''are you with us or against us''.
It was a clever plot, and history is full of such plots being laid around Muslims.
Invasion of Afghanistan was another one of those treacherous plot!
We realized it after it was too late, Musharraf sensed it earliest and laid foundation of modernizing armed forces.
No world power can fight Pakistan one on one, they will look for Mir Jaffars among us.
As a response, Islamic states are getting united, perhaps already sharing intel.
In short, game is ON.

Hi,

Osama was in Sudan---he planned the bombings of the U S emobassies in africa---the U S threatened sudan---the sudanese kicked him out.
 
.
Hi,

Osama was in Sudan---he planned the bombings of the U S emobassies in africa---the U S threatened sudan---the sudanese kicked him out.

Main target of US is Pakistan.... OBL (the CIA kid), is no more in Afghanistan but US/UK still have military cities right next to Pakistan border and there's lot more to it.
 
.
Main target of US is Pakistan.... OBL (the CIA kid), is no more in Afghanistan but US/UK still have military cities right next to Pakistan border and there's lot more to it.

Hi,

But what have you done to counter it----nothing---.
 
. . .
Journal's job is to publish, not to carryout research work.
Above (published) verdict is not of the journal but is a research of ESI (European Scientific Institute) http://euinstitute.net/
You need to counter the technical arguments of the experts, involved in the research.
Indians should setup a panel to counter those researchers, trolling here is not enough.
If Indians are not happy, they should sue the journal or the researchers, rather than misleading Pakistanis.

Nope Im not misleading, educateinspirechange.org is misleading:
http://www.snopes.com/journal-endorses-911-conspiracy-theory/

ESI´s official stand is that, 911 was not a controlled demolition.

Who ever believes that this news is authentic, please ask ESI directly they will tell you the truth: http://euinstitute.net/#pg-2040-4
 
Last edited:
.
"However, it appears that Le and Bažant erroneously used an upper section mass of 54.18 × 106 kg and an impacted floor mass of just 0.627 × 106 kg, which contradicted the floor mass of 3.87 × 106 kg Bažant had used in earlier papers -"

These authors blew it. There's no "contradiction": the Twin Towers were top-heavy, stabilized with computer-controlled mass dampers.
 
.
Tell me in what nursery fools like you grow up in---. Millions butchered by the U S military invasion and you are saying " couldn't gain anything ".
First of all, try to be ethical when communicating with people. If you think someone is fool, you don't have to act like a fool. Make sense?

Welcome to the forum---if your family and tribe was slaughtered and butchered by the american soldiers like it happened in afg---iraq libya syria etc maybe your answer would be different.

With 4.5 million dead muslims---40 million homeless muslims---4- major muslim nation destroyed / decimated---and pakistani idiots say that the " U S has gained nothing "---.

Tell me in what nursery fools like you grow up in---. Millions butchered by the U S military invasion and you are saying " couldn't gain anything ".
Yes, millions and millions are dead. I agree to that part. However, if you had analyzed the situation more closely you would have known, its not only Americans killing Muslims. You've Russians killing muslims, Americans, Israel, and muslims killing muslims as well. Grow up dude.
 
.
It’s Official: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition

http://educateinspirechange.org/alt...-journal-concludes-911-controlled-demolition/

15-years after the attacks on September 11th, the European Scientific Journal, a publication of theEuropean Scientific Institute (ESI), published an article titled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” in which they analyze the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings. The results of their findings continue to indicate that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition, and the fact that this controversial topic was covered by a publication that boasts aneditorial committee from reputable colleges and universities around the world (despite the article’s disclaimer), can be considered yet another small victory for 9/11 Truthers.

The study was written in collaboration by Steven Jones of Brigham Young University (now retired), Robert Korol of McMaster University – a Mechanical Design Engineer in the aerospace industry, Anthony Szamboti, and Ted Walter of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The highly-sourced study breaks down the scientific evidence while revealing the discrepancies in NIST’s official report, and we suggest our readers – especially the skeptics – read it in its entirety.

One of the most important testimonies on the collapse of the World Trade Towers that was brought to attention in the study comes from the head structural engineer of the towers, John Skilling. It is apparently not enough for skeptics to take the findings of thousands of architects and engineersseriously, but should a skeptic choose not to at least consider the expertise of one of the men who built the WTC towers, then they are purposefully remaining blind.

Every sort of catastrophe that can happen to a high-rise building has to be taken into consideration during the design and construction processes, including the impact of an airplane. According to a 1993report from The Seattle Times, the Trade Towers were analyzed years ago, after concern was raised over a case where an airplane hit the Empire State Building. It was concluded at the time that the Trade Towers could withstand the impact of a Boeing 707.

In a statement made to The Seattle Times by Skilling:

We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side, however back in those days people didn’t think about terrorists very much.” He continues, “Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane)would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed. The building structure would still be there. However, I’m not saying that properly applied explosives – shaped explosives – of that magnitude could not do a tremendous amount of damage. I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it.”

As stated in the study: “In other words, Skilling believed the only mechanism that could bring down the Twin Towers was controlled demolition.” It should be pointed out, as well, that a steel-framed high-rise building has never completely collapsed from fire. And yet on September 11, 2001, three buildings supposedly collapsed in this manner, one of which wasn’t even hit by a plane.

It was on this latter point that the authors concluded their study. They state:

It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists.”

This article (European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition) is a free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and AnonHQ.com.

Controlled Demolition Expert on 9/11:


Just follow the links in your own post, and You will find the following.

IMG_1686.jpg
 
.
First of all, try to be ethical when communicating with people. If you think someone is fool, you don't have to act like a fool. Make sense?


Yes, millions and millions are dead. I agree to that part. However, if you had analyzed the situation more closely you would have known, its not only Americans killing Muslims. You've Russians killing muslims, Americans, Israel, and muslims killing muslims as well. Grow up dude.

Youngman,

I have already grown up---and in the last lap of my life.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom