What's new

It's been more than 20 years since the Canadian navy commissioned a surface combatant

. . . . .
USN GUARDING THEIR COASTS ACCORDING TO NORD ACCORD

You can never rely on anyone. Plus Canada needs to create more jobs for its own once powerful shipbuilding industry. A service based economy will be very vulnerable to sudden shocks.
 
.
You can never rely on anyone. Plus Canada needs to create more jobs for its own once powerful shipbuilding industry. A service based economy will be very vulnerable to sudden shocks.
YES, BUT ITS CANADIAN CHOICE TO RELY ON USN, SO WHAT YOUR PROBLEMS, NOW THEY ARE THINKING TO REPLACE THEIR HALIFAX DESTROYERS WITH NEW SHIPS, ACCORDING TO SOME REPORTS THEY ERE INTERESTED IN UK'S NEW FRIGATES, THAT'S AUSTRALIA BUYING
 
.
YES, BUT ITS CANADIAN CHOICE TO RELY ON USN, SO WHAT YOUR PROBLEMS, NOW THEY ARE THINKING TO REPLACE THEIR HALIFAX DESTROYERS WITH NEW SHIPS, ACCORDING TO SOME REPORTS THEY ERE INTERESTED IN UK'S NEW FRIGATES, THAT'S AUSTRALIA BUYING

No one should rely on another. Canada should be self sufficient and not put all the eggs in one basket, especially with someone as mad as Trump around.
 
.
. . .
Actually envy a country like Canada. They are in a location with very less threat, next to a superpower whom they don't have a problem with. Not needing to spend money on defence with US happy to take over that role paid by US taxpayers.
 
.
Actually envy a country like Canada. They are in a location with very less threat, next to a superpower whom they don't have a problem with. Not needing to spend money on defence with US happy to take over that role paid by US taxpayers.

US tried to take over Canada and can try that again. If US invades Canada, China and Russia declare war on the US because they don't want to see the US become bigger and more powerful.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom