Italy bans halal slaughter

[zip]

Aoa




I agree. However, my point is that the greater moral question is of killing or not killing an animal. Once you've decided that you will kill, I think the question of zabiha or stun methods are not really the kind you can wag your finger at the other about (in terms of moral high ground).

...

I agree but here discussion is about second part ..

 

[Peaceful Civilian]

Their country, their rules! None of our business.

 

[HannibalBarca]

Their country, their rules! None of our business.

Take your "Our" out of the way... you ain't them neither us...

Your "real" sentence.

"Their country, their rules! None of MY business."

 

[Tiberius]

Fascism is back in Italy.

Thanks god.

 

[MultaniGuy]

Their country, their rules! None of our business.

You are correct to a certain extent, but Italy should not claim to secular, liberal and inclusive. lol.

 

[Peaceful Civilian]

Take your "Our" out of the way... you ain't them neither us...

Your "real" sentence.

"Their country, their rules! None of MY business."

You looks nice man, humanity is what matters most. You will go in paradise on day of judgement, others will just get trolled.

 

[Tiberius]

You are correct to a certain extent, but Italy should not claim to secular, liberal and inclusive. lol.

Our interior minister calls himself a proud facist.

What argument have you left?

 

[HannibalBarca]

You looks nice man, humanity is what matters most. You will go in paradise on day of judgement, others will just get trolled.

That I don't know. One word. "Inshallah" as I hope for you too.

 

[MultaniGuy]

Our interior minister calls himself a proud facist.

What argument have you left?

Italy still claims to be a secular country, you ignorant one.

 

[Peaceful Civilian]

You are correct to a certain extent, but Italy should not claim to secular, liberal and inclusive. lol.

What they claim is none of my business too. Even if they say Italy is Muslim country, then full stop, we can’t question them. Their right, their way of live.... their choice

 

[Knight Rider]

So new halal Italian method is to put a bullet in the animal head and torture it until its dead. Bravo !!!! Sorry mate Muslims cant do that. We don't like torturing animals and see them in pain.

Modern Italy is not a Christian state but is more like those liberals or atheists. Christians don't do such things. First Italy bans Muslim women from wearing Scarf on head which indicate Liberalism not Christianity because Christian religious women (Nuns) wear scarf on head and to cover their faces and now banning halal slaughter.

 

[MultaniGuy]

What they claim is none of my business too. Even if they say Italy is Muslim country, then full stop, we can’t question them. Their right, their way of live.... their choice

For a person like you coming a Liberal persuasion, you fail as usual.

How is what they claim not my business. It is my business because they expect the world to listen to their claims and expects the world to see they live up to their claims.

Epic fail. facepalm.

 

[Peaceful Civilian]

That I don't know. One word. "Inshallah" as I hope for you too.

Thanks but I don’t need paradise. Just good human being is enough.

 

[zip]

You fool it doesn't say that.

It says meat processing and digesting comes naturally to humans.

Nice try though.

Physiological Proof That Humans
Are Omnivores


Humans are omnivores. This is not a passed-down oral tradition used to exploit animals… it is a scientific fact supported by extensive evidence. Even famous vegan-promoting blogs like Vegan Biologist and VRG admit that humans are natural omnivores. Anatomically, psychologically, and socially, our very being is one meant to eat meat. Let’s look at some specific examples, and the research behind them, to find out why:

Evolutionary Advancement
Consuming animal products played a crucial role in humans becoming the dominant species on earth.
higher quality protein, gave humans accelerated development in areas such as younger weaning ages, logical processing skills, language, and socialization. Many vegans say that humans are not supposed to eat meat because we cannot consume it raw. The truth is that, originally, we could eat uncooked meat, and would be just fine. However, with the advancements of cooking food, especially by way of fire, our digestive system devolved and became sensitive to now-disease-causing bacteria in raw meat. To anyone who claims this devolution means we should no longer consume meat, I ask you to go to a farm, pick any fruit or vegetable straight from the plant, and eat it without washing it. Bugs, roots, dirt, and all. We used to be able to do that, as well. If your logic states that if we can’t eat a product in its original form, then you shouldn’t be able to eat anything at all.

Sources:
McBroom, Patricia. "Meat-eating Was Essential for Human Evolution, Says UC Berkeley Anthropologist Specializing in
Diet." 06.14.99 - Meat-eating Was Essential for Human Evolution, Says UC Berkeley Anthropologist Specializing in Diet.
University of California at Berkley, 14 June 1999. Web. 26 June 2017.
Milton, Katharine. "The Critical Role Played by Animal Source Foods in Human (Homo) Evolution1,2." The Journal of Nutrition.
The American Society for Nutrition, 01 Nov. 2003. Web. 26 June 2017.
Psouni, Elia, Axel Janke, and Martin Garwicz. "Impact of Carnivory on Human Development and Evolution Revealed by a New
Unifying Model of Weaning in Mammals." PLOS ONE. Public Library of Science, 18 Apr. 2012. Web. 26 June 2017.
Smil, Vaclav. "Should Humans Eat Meat? [Excerpt]." Scientific American. Scientific American, 19 July 2013. Web. 26 June 2017.

Intelligence
The majority of the most intelligent species on Earth are omnivorous. This applies to humans and explains our outstanding reasoning skills that surpass the vast majority of the animal kingdom. For example, dolphins, swine, and, believe it or not, even wolves are species that consume both plant and animal-based foods, resulting in higher cognitive abilities. Even among apes, there is a clear distinction between those that only eat plants, who function at lower levels, and meat-eating types. The very weak vegan argument claiming humans should not eat meat because we do not possess claws or sharp teeth, or cannot keep up with our prey, making us “ineffective” hunters is not applicable because it was our advanced reasoning that enabled us to come up with hunting methods, such as spearing, trapping, and, eventually, shooting animals for food.

Sources:
Bradshaw, John W. S. "The Evolutionary Basis for the Feeding Behavior of Domestic Dogs (Canis Familiaris) and Cats (Felis
Catus)1–3." The Journal of Nutrition. Journal of Nutrition, 01 July 2006. Web. 26 June 2017.
Marino, Lori, and Christina M. Colvin. "Thinking Pigs: A Comparative Review of Cognition, Emotion, and Personality in Sus
Domesticus." EScholarship. California Digital Library, 2015. Web. 26 June 2017.
Seyfarth, Robert M., and Dorothy L. Cheney. "What Are Big Brains For?" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America. The National Academy of Sciences, 02 Apr. 2002. Web. 26 June 2017.
Eyes
By design, mankind is a hunter, not a prey. For example, like many other animals that hunt such as lions, owls, and wolves, humans have eyes out of the front of their heads. However, most prey animals, which are lower on the trophic levels making them herbivores, have eyes on the sides of their heads to look out for predators. Humans would not have this ability to look straight ahead of ourselves if we weren’t meant to hunt for meat. The shape of our pupils is significant, too. Throughout the animal kingdom, circular pupils typically means animals that hunt for their prey, in contrast to the horizontally elongated pupils that many exclusive herbivores have.
“How to ‘Read’ a Skull: Eye Placement and Size.” SKELETONS: Museum of Osteology (Oklahoma City), SKELETONS: Museum of
Osteology.
“Predator Vs Prey.” Vision Source Specialists - Rapid City, Hot Springs, Phillip Eye Doctors, Vision Specialists, 3 Sept. 2016.
Yang, Sarah. "Hunter or Prey? The Eyes Are the Key." University of California. UC Berkeley, 7 Aug. 2015. Web. 26 June 2017.


Digestive System
Human intestinal length and digestive enzymes are more similar to carnivores than they are to herbivores. Most herbivores actually have cellulosic symbionts, or colonies of bacteria, fungi, or protozoa that live in their stomachs and break down the chemical cellulose from their food. Humans do not have this capability, so we cannot digest cellulose, which, in most cases, is what constitutes as fiber. One reason we cannot digest certain plant materials is that our cecum is not functional, whereas, in legitimate herbivores, the cecum is a very large organ that plays a major role in digestion. Fiber, by definition is any food substance we cannot digest (all of which comes from plant sources), and is beneficial because it cleans out our digestive system and promotes colon health. However, the very fact that we cannot digest fiber when true herbivores can proves we are not meant to be exclusively plant eaters.

Sources:
"Fiber." The Nutrition Source. The President and Fellows of Harvard College, 12 Apr. 2016. Web. 26 June 2017.
"Gastrointestinal Microorganisms and Other Animal Hosts." Gastrointestinal Microorganisms and Other Animal Hosts |
Department of Microbiology. Cornell University, n.d. Web. 26 June 2017.
Jolitz, Stephanie. "Digestive Tract Comparison." Cal Poly Ponoma. Kellogg Honors College Capstone, 2011. Web. 26 June 2017.


Health Outcomes:
As I mentioned in Part 2 of my Complete Debunk of Every What The Health Statistic, if humans were naturally herbivorous, every single human being would be perfectly healthy on a plant-based diet. However, my several-month-long Nutrition Series explained all the ways that each animal product is an essential component to our health, and also all of the negative health effects of a vegan diet. In it, I cited over 100 studies, each of which proved that a balanced omnivorous diet is healthier than even the most well-planned vegan one. From hormonal imbalances, to nutrient deficiencies, to decreased cognitive functions, the data collected from devout vegans proves that we are not meant to survive only on plants.

Some additional sources:
Fischler, Claude, 1988. "Food, Self and Identity." Social Science Information 27:275-293.
Motley, Heath. "Human Are Omnivores - Collection of Papers, Studies and Links." Scribd. Scribd, n.d. Web. 26 June 2017.
Shute, Nancy. "For Most Of Human History, Being An Omnivore Was No Dilemma." NPR. NPR, 20 Apr. 2012. Web. 26 June 2017.
https://farmingtruth.weebly.com/omnivores.html

There are countless articles which say Humans are Omnivores.

There must be thousands of articles as world is full of meat eaters for consumption..Our length of intestine is 12 times of our body unlike tiger, lion with very short intestine suitable for movement of meat inside system

Are Humans Carnivores or Herbivores?
September 9, 2005






Are human beings anatomically more similar to natural carnivores or to natural herbivores? Let’s find out….

• Intestinal tract length. Carnivorous animals have intestinal tracts that are 3-6x their body length, while herbivores have intestinal tracts 10-12x their body length. Human beings have the same intestinal tract ratio as herbivores.
• Stomach acidity. Carnivores’ stomachs are 20x more acidic than the stomachs of herbivores. Human stomach acidity matches that of herbivores.
• Saliva. The saliva of carnivores is acidic. The saliva of herbivores is alkaline, which helps pre-digest plant foods. Human saliva is alkaline.
• Shape of intestines. Carnivore bowels are smooth, shaped like a pipe, so meat passes through quickly — they don’t have bumps or pockets. Herbivore bowels are bumpy and pouch-like with lots of pockets, like a windy mountain road, so plant foods pass through slowly for optimal nutrient absorption. Human bowels have the same characteristics as those of herbivores.
• Fiber. Carnivores don’t require fiber to help move food through their short and smooth digestive tracts. Herbivores require dietary fiber to move food through their long and bumpy digestive tracts, to prevent the bowels from becoming clogged with rotting food. Humans have the same requirement as herbivores.
• Cholesterol. Cholesterol is not a problem for a carnivore’s digestive system. A carnivore such as a cat can handle a high-cholesterol diet without negative health consequences. A human cannot. Humans have zero dietary need for cholesterol because our bodies manufacture all we need. Cholesterol is only found in animal foods, never in plant foods. A plant-based diet is by definition cholesterol-free.
• Claws and teeth. Carnivores have claws, sharp front teeth capable of subduing prey, and no flat molars for chewing. Herbivores have no claws or sharp front teeth capable of subduing prey, but they have flat molars for chewing. Humans have the same characteristics as herbivores.

But aren’t humans anatomically suited to be omnivores?

Nope. We don’t anatomically match up with omnivorous animals anymore than we do with carnivorous ones. Omnivores are more similar to carnivores than they are to herbivores.

The opportunistic feeder theory has been thoroughly debunked. This theory states that because humans can eat like omnivores, that we must therefore be omnivores. However, mere behavior doesn’t indicate suitability. There are plenty of things we can do as a species that would threaten our survival if we all considered them suitable default behavior, such as shooting each other, lobbing hand grenades, or sending spam

 

[MultaniGuy]

There must be thousands of articles as world is full of meat eaters for consumption..Our length of intestine is six times of our body unlike tiger, lion with very short intestine suitable for movement of meat inside system
View attachment 504286
View attachment 504287
Are Humans Carnivores or Herbivores?
September 9, 2005






Are human beings anatomically more similar to natural carnivores or to natural herbivores? Let’s find out….

• Intestinal tract length. Carnivorous animals have intestinal tracts that are 3-6x their body length, while herbivores have intestinal tracts 10-12x their body length. Human beings have the same intestinal tract ratio as herbivores.
• Stomach acidity. Carnivores’ stomachs are 20x more acidic than the stomachs of herbivores. Human stomach acidity matches that of herbivores.
• Saliva. The saliva of carnivores is acidic. The saliva of herbivores is alkaline, which helps pre-digest plant foods. Human saliva is alkaline.
• Shape of intestines. Carnivore bowels are smooth, shaped like a pipe, so meat passes through quickly — they don’t have bumps or pockets. Herbivore bowels are bumpy and pouch-like with lots of pockets, like a windy mountain road, so plant foods pass through slowly for optimal nutrient absorption. Human bowels have the same characteristics as those of herbivores.
• Fiber. Carnivores don’t require fiber to help move food through their short and smooth digestive tracts. Herbivores require dietary fiber to move food through their long and bumpy digestive tracts, to prevent the bowels from becoming clogged with rotting food. Humans have the same requirement as herbivores.
• Cholesterol. Cholesterol is not a problem for a carnivore’s digestive system. A carnivore such as a cat can handle a high-cholesterol diet without negative health consequences. A human cannot. Humans have zero dietary need for cholesterol because our bodies manufacture all we need. Cholesterol is only found in animal foods, never in plant foods. A plant-based diet is by definition cholesterol-free.
• Claws and teeth. Carnivores have claws, sharp front teeth capable of subduing prey, and no flat molars for chewing. Herbivores have no claws or sharp front teeth capable of subduing prey, but they have flat molars for chewing. Humans have the same characteristics as herbivores.

But aren’t humans anatomically suited to be omnivores?

Nope. We don’t anatomically match up with omnivorous animals anymore than we do with carnivorous ones. Omnivores are more similar to carnivores than they are to herbivores.

The opportunistic feeder theory has been thoroughly debunked. This theory states that because humans can eat like omnivores, that we must therefore be omnivores. However, mere behavior doesn’t indicate suitability. There are plenty of things we can do as a species that would threaten our survival if we all considered them suitable default behavior, such as shooting each other, lobbing hand grenades, or sending spam

Source? Where are you getting your crap articles from.

I have two reliable articles. You only have one opinionated dubious one. LOL