What's new

Italy bans halal slaughter

.
No, you are wrong. You go according to your claim. We go according to our ideology. If you disagree with it, fine. That is your opinion.

We are saying that India should go according to it's claim. Why don't you allow beef slaughtering. why the hypocrisy? ;)

Because it is a democracy, it is what people want. In the states where there are enough people who consume beef, cow slaughter is legal. It is a matter of choice.

But Muslims and Islamic countries have no moral authority to question secular democracies about how secular they are.
 
.
How about I stun you electrically or a shotgun instead? Will you prefer that?

There is no humane way of slaughtering an animal.

At least when the knife is used the blood flows which is a source of illness.

Don't want an animal to suffer? Stop eating meat. Don't give us baloney lectures on suffering.
So you want death from knife on your throat rather than chopping from behind !!..blood will flow anyhow ..
 
. . .
Because it is a democracy, it is what people want. In the states where there are enough people who consume beef, cow slaughter is legal. It is a matter of choice.

But Muslims and Islamic countries have no moral authority to question secular democracies about how secular they are.
Sure India may be a democracy, but is it truly secular? Then don't claim to be a secular democracy. Just claim to be a democracy then.
 
.
Halal mutton is tastier and does not have the "smell" of jhatka mutton.

This is not an isolated observation.

Ask anyone who eats both.

Cheers, Doc
 
.
Because it is a democracy, it is what people want. In the states where there are enough people who consume beef, cow slaughter is legal. It is a matter of choice.

But Muslims and Islamic countries have no moral authority to question secular democracies about how secular they are.

Who the fvck gets to decide who has how much moral authority? You belong to a country where rape and a caste system is religion. Do you have sufficient moral authority to lecture others on anything?
 
. .
Aoa

So you want death from knife on your throat rather than chopping from behind !!..blood will flow anyhow ..

Such a fascinating argument.

if you must empathise with the animal, why kill it at all? Why is it that 'killing' must be done at all? If the argument is one must imagine oneself as the animal - then why stop at the method? Why not ask:


If you were an animal, would you rather you were slaughtered humanely so someone could enjoy your meat or would you prefer you weren't killed at all?


...
 
.
Who the fvck gets to decide who has how much moral authority? You belong to a country where rape and a caste system is religion. Do you have sufficient moral authority to lecture others on anything?
Exactly who are the Indians to judge our political system based on their supposed ruling system benchmark.

Who gave the Indians the moral authority to judge another system?
 
.
Sure India may be a democracy, but is it truly secular? Then don't claim to be a secular democracy. Just claim to be a democracy then.

You being a Pakistani and a Muslim don't have the moral right to question other countries about their degree of "secularness".

If India is a secular country, it is by choice! Are you saying if tomorrow India stops claiming to be a secular country any crime against religious minorities would be ok?

Who the fvck gets to decide who has how much moral authority? You belong to a country where rape and a caste system is religion. Do you have sufficient moral authority to lecture others on anything?

Well one thing is for sure, Islamic countries have no moral right to question others about their secularism.
 
.
Who the fvck is talking about blood here? We are talking about suffering of an animal.
No one knows about suffering when you cut throat or chop from behind but you can certainly avoid mental trauma animal has to go through when cut throat of an animal Infront of its eyes slowly by chopping an unsuspecting animal from behind .. vegetarian is best and our digestive system is built for it ..
 
.
You being a Pakistani and a Muslim don't have the moral right to question other countries about their degree of "secularness".

If India is a secular country, it is by choice! Are you saying if tomorrow India stops claiming to be a secular country any crime against religious minorities would be ok?



Well one thing is for sure, Islamic countries have no moral right to question others about their secularism.
Oh yes we do. You should go according to your claim. If you are not going to your claim, then we have the right to question your claim.
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom