My argument was not about covering faces genius it was about depriving people of their religious practice. How would you feel if they banned wearing yellow flower necklaces on the basis of "some people are allergic to it". This is pretty much the same.
How would I feel if yellow flower necklaces were not allowed?
The same way I would feel when a holy cow Shambo is killed in the UK.
Nothing.
These are mere symbolic icons that are out of date with modernity.
I find the Christian, Hindu and Muslim extra religious people click clacking on their worry beads, equally disturbing!
Religion, in my opinion, has to be dynamic and not stagnant in a 'timewrap'.
You speak of religious freedom.
How many Churches are there in Saudi Arabia, which claim to be the most Holy of Islamic countries?
Riyadh, 20 March (AKI) - No churches should be permitted in Saudi Arabia, unless Pope Benedict XVI recognised the prophet Mohammed, according to a Middle East expert.
Saudi Arabia: No churches unless prophet Mohammed recognised, says expert - Adnkronos Religion
Is partaking in alcoholic beverages allowed in Muslim nations?
How about that being a curb on freedom?
What about the manner one has to be dressed in Saudi Arabia and thereby forcing Islamic ways on the people?
You find the banning of Burkha reprehensible. No quibbles on that.
What is your take on the Christians in Pakistan finding the Blasphemy Law equally reprehensible (and they do not believe in Islam that they should be subjected to the Islamic Law of Sharia), if one goes by the media reports.
One cannot have one's cake and eat it too!
One must learn to live in alien lands in peace with their natives and not force their ways through as if it were their right.
If the aliens don't care for one's belief, then one should not care about them too! One should return home with honour and not grovel and gripe.
But if you want to remain in an alien land and live off the fat of such a land, you have to make adjustments.