What's new

It Hurts Me To See Hinduism Going The Way Of Radical Islam

Status
Not open for further replies.
Radical form of Hinduism has been here for sometime to say "going the way of radical Islam" is a bit insulting.
 
Fucking ridiculous, now religion who's existence is based on racial caste system will teach others how to be just and peaceful. lanat teri shakal pay
 
Saudi Arabia.

Wrong, Christian/Hindu/etc expats are free to practice their religion freely.

You don't need to .Please show me a couple of Islamic nations where the population of its religious minorities exceed 20% or even 15% except Malaysia ,where Islam is protected under an ingenious policy calling for preferential treatment for the original inhabitants or Bhumi putras .

What does this have to do with anything about my comment? Demographics has nothing to do with freedom of religion.

Also

Bosnia 50% Muslim
Albania 50% Muslim

Just to name 2

Just for my information , kindly confirm how many of them enjoy equal rights as the Muslims do in their own land before the law and that would include right to practise ones religion with the right to proselytize too.

All of them enjoy equal rights. Also proselytizing has nothing to do with freedom of religion. Sri Lanka banned evangelizing too.

But if you must know than pretty much the majority of Muslim countries allow proselytizing. Look at places like Bosnia,Albania,Turkey,Egypt,etc
 
Middle-east oil will last for few decades.

Actually a couple centuries

"Moreover, as well as bountiful oilfields in North America, Russia, Saudi Arabia and other producers in the Middle East, there are massive, barely tapped reserves not billions of barrels’ worth, but trillions. So the planet is not about to run out of oil. On the contrary, according to a Harvard University report published last year, we are heading for a glut."

"The 75-page study, by oil executive Leonardo Mauler, was based on a field-by-field analysis of most of the major oil exploration and development projects in the world, and it predicted a 20 per cent increase in global oil production by 2020."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/energy/oil/9867659/Why-the-world-isnt-running-out-of-oil.html


developed to a good extend.
:lol::enjoy:

What is your definition of freely? Do you know Hindus are prohibited from possessing photos/idols of their god in Saudi even in the privacy of their own homes.

I don't think you need a statue of ram to pray to him my friend.
 
We are not in hurry, Middle-east oil will last for few decades. By that time India will be developed to a good extend.

Do not reveal what you have thought upon doing, but by wise council keep it secret being determined to carry it into execution.

- Chanakya

No no no Hindu warrior, do it now declare the hindutva state

You never know Pakistan can be unpredictable we might fire 100+ nuclear warheads at you snd burn your hindutva rastra into ashes

Do it now and show your hindu pride!!
 
Dear Ms AbreenZaidi, you tripped in the very first sentence, Hinduism isnt just a religion but a way of life.
No wonder you got it so wrong. :rolleyes:

That is, unfortunately, where the definition of radical Islam begins as well - as a way of life as opposed to a system of personal belief. Once something is defined as a way of life, spillover into the political realm is inevitable and you can say goodbye to the secular identity of India.
 
So Muslims would decide why is appropriate for Hindus. And that is your definition of freely?

Go take your statue to ram to Oman/or the UAE both of which are muslim countries and both of which have Sharia law or any other muslim country, if you are so concerned my friend.
 
So Muslims would decide why is appropriate for Hindus. And that is your definition of freely?

You cant expect us to allow pagan idols in Arabia, they were destroyed over a millenia ago for a reason
 
You cant expect us to allow pagan idols in Arabia, they were destroyed over a millenia ago for a reason

Interesting. So you are saying the idols that were destroyed in Arabia were idols of Hindu gods.

I knew that Mitanni was a Hindu Kingdom, but seems like Hinduism also had its presence in the Arabian peninsula.



upload_2017-4-22_18-10-30.png


upload_2017-4-22_18-19-4.png



dna-lead-image.jpg

Shiva was our first prophet, says Jamiat mufti
  • Shares1.8k
DEEPAK GIDWANI | Fri, 20 Feb 2015-05:40am , Lucknow , DNA

A cleric and senior functionary of the Jamiat Ulema has raised a religious storm by stating that Lord Shiva was the first 'paigambar' (Prophet) of the Muslims, and that all Muslims are also the children of Shiva and Parvati. The statement – made in Ayodhya – has expectedly set off a huge controversy with Islamic clerics getting furious over this alleged "bigotry". Many Hindu saints have, however, welcomed the statement, only adding fuel to the fire.

"Like all citizens of China are called Chinese, and those living in Japan, Japanese, all those living in Hindustan are recognised as Hindus all over the world," says the cleric Mufti Muhammad Ilyas. He carries his rather simplistic logic further, saying: "Muslims are also the children of Shiva and Parvati. We are "sanatani" like Hindus."

Wily nily, the Maulana has only toed the line taken by the saffron brigade, voiced in so many words recently by RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat. The statement, beamed on TV channels all through the day, has come as a virtual bolt from the blue for Islamic clerics, already screaming blue murder.

"This is totally ridiculous," nonagenarian Hashim Ansari, the oldest party in the ongoing Ayodhya shrine dispute, almost bursts out before the media. "Clerics like him read the Quran but don't understand or follow it at all," he said. "In any case, Muslims don't regard the Jamiat as 'ulema'," he asserted.

Mufti Mukarram Ahmed, Imam of Fatehpuri Masjid, also rejected Iliyas's statements. "What he has said, is totally wrong and unacceptable. It's nowhere written in our holy book. This could be his political statement," Mukarram said. "We rever only the 'nabis' (Prophets) mentioned in the Quran," he added.

Vice-president of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board and much-respected Shia cleric Maulana Kalbe Sadiq said, "This Maulana should first learn the basics of both Hinduism and Islam. Clerics should not make such irresponsible statments about religion."

On the other hand, prominent Hindu priests of Ayodhya have welcomed the statement. "What the Maulana has said is backed by facts. It's recorded in our scriptures and mythology," says Mahant Janmejaya Sharan. "Maulana Iliyas is right. This should be welcomed by Muslims, too. It will bring us together like brothers," says Mahant Satyendra Das, chief priest of the disputed Ram temple in Ayodhya.

Maulana Iliyas was in Ayodhya on Thursday as part of a delegation of the Jamiat Ulema to urge saints to participate in a conference on communal harmony on February 27 in Balrampur (east UP). Reportedly, the conference could also consider a motion on the subject of Hindus and Muslims being the children of the same set of parents.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-shiva-was-our-first-prophet-says-jamiat-mufti-2062519
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-4-22_18-15-32.png
    upload_2017-4-22_18-15-32.png
    476 KB · Views: 15
That is, unfortunately, where the definition of radical Islam begins as well - as a way of life as opposed to a system of personal belief. Once something is defined as a way of life, spillover into the political realm is inevitable and you can say goodbye to the secular identity of India.

It's both a way of life and personal belief .And it's been so since centuries .What Islam is undergoing now w.r.t radicalism is something Hindus have undergone in the distant past before it's exposure to Shamanic Sampradaya smoothened it's rough edges and tempered the violence inherent in it to some extent .

Witness the Bhagvad Geeta when Krishna exhorts Arjun to slay his enemies irrespective of whether they are his kin for as a Kshatriya his duty is to uphold Dharma.

Now tell me , how many times have you heard or read Hindus invoke the Geeta to uphold Dharma which may also involve killing ones who uphold adharma if need be ?
 
It's both a way of life and personal belief .And it's been so since centuries .What Islam is undergoing now w.r.t radicalism is something Hindus have undergone in the distant past before it's exposure to Shamanic Sampradaya smoothened it's rough edges and tempered the violence inherent in it to some extent .

Witness the Bhagvad Geeta when Krishna exhorts Arjun to slay his enemies irrespective of whether they are his kin for as a Kshatriya his duty is to uphold Dharma.

Now tell me , how many times have you heard or read Hindus invoke the Geeta to uphold Dharma which may also involve killing ones who uphold adharma if need be ?

I have nothing against harmless mumbo-jumbo as long as it does not infringe upon my Constitutional rights. Once it does so, we have a problem.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom