I am too buisy latley to participate in the forum, and I got tired a bit from the same arguments, but since this is something I haven't had a chance to discuss before here, I will make an exception.
Hey Barbara Specter,you bovine looking shemale how about going to Tel Aviv and give lessons in there,instead of Sweden?
Jewish activist promotes "multicultural mode" for Europa: Sample Sweden - YouTube
Ofcourse,this is only "good" for Europe.
While i concur with you it still doesn't answer my questions.Why are jewish activists promoting this
Elever lärde andra elever om islam - Kristianstad - Kristianstadsbladet - Nyheter dygnet runt in european kindergardens? ...look at those pictures and what those kids are thaught!
I can't stand this kinds of people, sadly many of them make a base of operation in Israel while being funded by their European branches. This is not limited to Europe only, but since the vast majority here (over 90%, probably even higher than 95%) detest them they have to branch out to Europe to get funding. (bodies such as Shatil and NIF for example). There is also the (mostly) European Amnesty international.
If you aren't interested in asylum seekers, then why don't you send them from where they came from in first place?
Maybe she needs to get the hell out of there ASAP
We have no problem with Asylum seekers in reality, the thing is that the vast vast majority of the Africans arriving into Israel are not refugees at all. They just migrating for economical reasons. Frankly I can't blame them and probably would have done the same in their stead. They even say so themselves. Why else pay thousands of dollars and brave the Sinai desert and it's gangs to arrive in Israel from safe Egypt?
Don't forget the Jews still make a lot of noise today because of the treatment some Jewish 'asylum seekers' from World War II got (some were turned away by Western countries). Wikipedia has an
whole entry whining about one such incident. Don't forget their current, out and proud racist attitude, as exemplified by Natan above, when they come to your with Holohysteria.
As stated above, Israel has no problem accepting Asylum seekers, some of the Africans have received refugee status. But almost entirely they are not refugees.
Yeah, are you forgetting you don't send them to "neutral" third countries only, but also to the very countries they were escaping from, including
Eritrea, widely known as the North Korea of Africa, and that you'll often confiscate any property and money they produced while in Israel?
There are numerous misconceptions in this post. The total of people that returned from Israel to Eritrea is 14. And they did so voluntarily, another man who was supposed to take the same flight changed his mind at the last minute and is still in Israel.
Eritrea is knows as NK of Africa by whom? the horde of ignorant? If Eritrea is the NK of Africa then how come millions have easily left it, can't say the same about NK. Sure freedom of the press in non existent in Eritrea but it is hardly the only criteria. Most of the "refugees" are just unwilling to take up the compulsory military service. I guess if I would have refused to go to the IDF I should have automatically got a US green card?
Give me one example when property or money made in Israel has been confiscated? on the contrary, Israel is paying them extra to leave, if they are willing.
Jews found willing hosts in many countries during WWII after the horrors of Holocaust. Its amusing that a country which links it existence to Holocaust would show such nonchalance to other asylum seekers of the world. If I recall correctly the early PMs of Israel repeatedly made the point that Israel was home for ALL downtrodden and persecuted minorities.
Interesting How Jews in the holocaust would take any refuge offered and be glad at that, many have given their children to churches or to Christian families in the hope they would escape death. Comparing the death camps of Nazi Germany and the desperation of the Jews of the time to the Africans who go Asylum shopping across the world from Sweden to Canada and Australia and Israel too is a joke. There were no UN camps just outside of Germany controlled territory where the Jews could be relatively safe fed and watered. They took every chance they got even if it meant for doctors lawyers and professors to become farmers and beggars. This is not similar at all with the case with most of the Africans who seek to better their lives.
Interesting and fake. Read my reply to him.
Some of them did not do that. Iran itself took in several such refugees, as did the countries of the Maghreb. Oh, and also Japan, a country your hasbara officials, for mysterious reasons, are giving themselves to insult nowadays. Curiously, the most notable cases of asylum refusal are those of the Western countries whose *** Israel loves to kiss today.
Indeed, just another example of the discrepancy in your comparison. The Jews of the time were eager to accept escape, even if that meant to downgrade their lives from western Europe to deserts of the 30's-40's middle east.
How many of the Jews of the time would have came back to Nazi Germany for economical reasons?
Here's the answer to the same question asked of Sudanese "refugees" for example:
Many Sudanese refugees are pushed into considering voluntary repatriation if only because surviving in Egypt is tough. Mideng Mebai, waiting at the Waqf Culture Centre for Sudanese refugees in Ain Shams, is one of them.
The UNHCR has a voluntary repatriation programme to facilitate the return of Sudanese refugees to South Sudan only. According to Etefa, 1,645 refugees took part in 2007, although it is not documented whether they made their way to the South or resettled in other parts of the country.
According to UNHCR's global appeal, key targets for 2008-2009 include the return of 5,000 refugees to Sudan with improved security in the South.
IRIN Middle East | EGYPT-SUDAN: Sudanese refugees face dilemma of return | Egypt | Sudan | Children | Economy | Human Rights | Refugees/IDPs
