Israelis, Among Most Enthusiastic Supporters of Torture, Red Cross Survey Says

[Mugwop]

Allow me to elaborate why the list should be like what you have posted.

1: India (Kafir,infidels, idolaters, super pegan nation so no surprises there)
2: old caucasian Americans and their republican stooges (How uncool are they? Hate poor immigrants)
3:israelis (Scary Jews, eat baby muslims for breakfast)
4:nigeria (Half of them are Christian and how dare they torment poor Boko Haram people btw?)

Try harder! Your polemic and religious BS posts don't have an effect on me. rss and their trolls on a mission to torture Pakistanis online Btw This is how you elaborate

1:india most racist and sadistic nation under Jah's sun.Believes in hindu supremacy and has a sick twisted fantasy of torturing and murdering Pakistanis and billions of muslims,christians for no reason.

2:old caucasian Americans: are immigrants themselves

3:israelis: some not all believe in supremacy and have a xenophobic nature.Ask the Black Hebrews

4:nigeria: Most oil in africa with massive poverty,ethic conflicts and religious ones too.Generals created boko haram.

Allow me to elaborate why the list should be like what you have posted.

1: India (Kafir,infidels, idolaters, super pegan nation so no surprises there)
2: old caucasian Americans and their republican stooges (How uncool are they? Hate poor immigrants)
3:israelis (Scary Jews, eat baby muslims for breakfast)
4:nigeria (Half of them are Christian and how dare they torment poor Boko Haram people btw?)

Try harder! Your polemic and religious BS posts don't have an effect on me. rss and their trolls on a mission to torture Pakistanis online Btw This is how you elaborate

1:india most racist and sadistic nation under Jah's sun.Believes in hindu supremacy and has a sick twisted fantasy of torturing and murdering Pakistanis and billions of muslims,christians for no reason.

2:old caucasian Americans: are immigrants themselves

3:israelis: some not all believe in supremacy and have a xenophobic nature.Ask the Black Hebrews

4:nigeria: Most oil in africa with massive poverty,ethic conflicts and religious ones too.Generals created boko haram.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Nope. They were a uniformed army,

MMmm. That is a drawing. A very inspired drawing. I will have to do more reading on this to give you definitive answer but my 'logic machine' says Britain was fighting against subjects who were rebels. If Britain considered the rebels as a army in the normative sense then it would amount to accepting defeat.

That is is if Britain recognized the American Continental Army it would be accepting that a separate state - America existed. A formal army can only belong to a recognized state.

So how could Britain recognize a army when it did NOT recognize the state that the army was supposedly fighting for. Get my point?

And act of slapping on uniforms means nothing. If Al-Qeada managed to place a order with ebay for cheap deal in uniforms it would not make it a army.

 

[Desertfalcon]

That is a drawing. A very inspired drawing.

Yes, and one of a very real event.

Britain was fighting against subjects who were rebels.

You are assuming that being a rebel is the same thing as being a terrorist or non-uniformed brigand. It is not. In my country's Civil War, that the Confederate States were in rebellion did NOT make their soldiers terrorists or non-uniformed insurgents. While neither the British nor the Union recognized the governments in rebellion, they did accord their armies the status of regular uniformed enemy combatants.

http://www.mountvernon.org/digital-encyclopedia/article/prisoners-of-war/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War_prison_camps#Parole

And act of slapping on uniforms means nothing. If Al-Qeada managed to place a order with ebay for cheap deal in uniforms it would not make it a army.

Which is why I very specifically pointed out to you that it has more to do with what they are wearing, but also things like status and HOW they conduct themselves. I assume that you did not see that in my earlier post.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

I hear you but your on very slippery ground there. Should the American 'rebels' have been shot by the British Army?

They were "non-uniformed insurgents". Ditto for Haganah, Irgun in Palestine?

In the end both parties agree which rules should apply.
If a rebel shows up at a pitched battle, not wearing uniform, but fight in a formation then if captured,
should be treated as a POW.
Same goes for rebel in civilian clothes, openly wearing firearms, even if ambushing a column of soldiers.

If a rebel attacks from a distance, wearing civilian clothes, and then hides the weapon,
only to come back a little later again firing, then there is no reason for any protection.
That is a definite war crime.
Likewise if a civilian carries a concealed knife, and makes a surprise attack with that knife,
even on a uniformed soldier, it is a war crime.

If You state your hostile intention openly and your side has agreed to abide by the Geneva convention
and does not make a habit of violating the convention, then You are entitled to protection.

 

[Śakra]

Allow me to elaborate why the list should be like what you have posted.

1: India (Kafir,infidels, idolaters, super pegan nation so no surprises there)
2: old caucasian Americans and their republican stooges (How uncool are they? Hate poor immigrants)
3:israelis (Scary Jews, eat baby muslims for breakfast)
4:nigeria (Half of them are Christian and how dare they torment poor Boko Haram people btw?)

Ignore her she isn't even desi.

 

[Hamza913]

British Army formally surrenders to the American Continental Army at Yorktown.


Nope. They were a uniformed army, fighting by the codes and conventions of war, recognized as such by foreign powers, the British included. It is not simply what they wear, it is their conduct and status.

No, you are just twisting words to fit your illogical stance.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

@Desertfalcon @Penguin I could push this point but I am going to drop it - I know how patriotic American's are and I don't want offend some good members here and there is enough of wanton Anti-Americanism here without me feeding the fire.

I will say though that this subject is fraught with politics and there is no clear cut definition. How you see things is largely decided by the observers politics. In 1980s in UK the IRA tried to present itself as a "Republic Army" but Mrs Thatcher would have non of it. Another thing is if those fighting the status quo do succeed then the rule book is changed. I guess the victors get to write the history.

 

[Solomon2]

So how could Britain recognize a army when it did NOT recognize the state that the army was supposedly fighting for. Get my point?

Easy. Recognize America but with GIII as king. Two states with one head-of-state. Like Scotland and England from the reign of James VI/I in 1603 to the Acts of Union in 1707.

 

[Prince of Dorne]

Try harder! Your polemic and religious BS posts don't have an effect on me. rss and their trolls on a mission to torture Pakistanis online Btw This is how you elaborate

1:india most racist and sadistic nation under Jah's sun.Believes in hindu supremacy and has a sick twisted fantasy of torturing and murdering Pakistanis and billions of muslims,christians for no reason.

Thank you for exposing us here, I hope the world will take notice and shun the hindus for good

 

[Mugwop]

Thank you for exposing us here, I hope the world will take notice and shun the hindus for good

I don't need to do anything here.You exposed yourself to be a bigot.

Ignore her she isn't even desi.

Desi is the corruption of the word desh-E which means "country's native"
PS I am not a muslim either but your fellow countryman is a narrow minded Islamaphobe who spends most of his time on

 

[Prince of Dorne]

I don't need to do anything here.You exposed yourself to be a bigot.

Desi is the corruption of the word desh-E which means "country's native"
PS I am not a muslim either but your fellow countryman is a narrow minded Islamaphobe who spends most of his time on

You are sooo right, no wonder you are a think tank

 

[Śakra]

Desi is the corruption of the word desh-E which means "country's native"
PS I am not a muslim either but your fellow countryman is a narrow minded Islamaphobe who spends most of his time on

No it isn't, you don't have the slightest clue about Indian languages. Desi isn't a corruption of anything. Desi means anything or anyone pertaining to the Subcontinent. Wth is a desh-e?? I've never heard that before. Please don't speak about things you don't know about.

You are sooo right, no wonder you are a think tank

Bhai, are you a desh-e??

 

[Prince of Dorne]

No it isn't, you don't have the slightest clue about Indian languages. Desi isn't a corruption of anything. Desi means anything or anyone pertaining to the Subcontinent. Wth is a desh-e?? I've never heard that before. Please don't speak about things you don't know about.

That's what she always does, and whoever does not agree with her she punishes with negatives

Bhai, are you a desh-e??

Perhaps i am brother, who knows, with all my negative ratings, the thing I learnt is no matter what the TTs say, is always the truth in PDF Good men died in this very platform trying to reason with them

 

[Mugwop]

No it isn't, you don't have the slightest clue about Indian languages. Desi isn't a corruption of anything. Desi means anything or anyone pertaining to the Subcontinent. Wth is a desh-e?? I've never heard that before. Please don't speak about things you don't know about.



Bhai, are you a desh-e??

The word desi came from the word Desh "which means country" The word desi is used by Pakistanis and indians living in western countries.

 

[Prince of Dorne]

The word desi came from the word Desh "which means country" The word desi is used by Pakistanis and indians living in western countries.

Absolutely right, if you do not mind my asking what is Desh-E then? What is that "E" for? Electronic Desi, like in e-commerce?