Israeli Father and baby die after being hit by stones from Palestinians

[anathema]

PS: Just keep visiting this thread and you guys will notice that Indians will get more butthurt at this then Israelis themselves

The same applies to you guys as well...You guys shout and scream about muslims being victimized than palestinian's themselves...there is only self interest..stick to that , both of us will do just fine...

 

[silko]

that is our problem...not yours.......

it doesnt look like that... if it was your problem you wouldn't say what you said. they need thay money and you make fun of it and say "so what..."

which geneva convention condones killing of babies....

i dont know, why dont you ask those who does it, let it be hamas or israel.

you make it sound like hamas is the only one killing innocent people and babies, israel have also done that. condemn that to!

we can argue that israel dont intentionally aim at civilians... but however a civilian life loss is a civilian life lost. arguing if it was right to kill a civilian or not is just idiotic.

 

[ptldM3]

so you are saying some evil extreme Palestinian planed this?

he probably went like this: "tomorrow there will be a man and a 18 month old baby in a car, we are going to hit it presisely at x time and that will do y damage. they will not think we killed them and they cant blame us, cause we know everything a rock can do!

The Palestinians has no regard for whoever was in the car, their goal was to hurt or kill the occupants regardless of whether it was a man, women or child. It's only reasonable to assume that a vehicle will have occupants and that those occupants may be children. For all they new or cared it could have been a 3 month old, a 24 month old or a 70 year old. The bottom line is that they did not care and as a result they threw stones at the car.

 

[jdme]

you seem to forget that those indians first of all is there for making a living for their family. it may not matter for the country, but it matters for them.

let them come to India, then what? work in some slums and earn like 2 cents in a day?

Surely some of them can afford better life than that? Unless 1.2 billion Indians live in slum and earn 2 cents a day which would PCI 7.30 $! And that would mean Indian GDP is like 11-12 billion?

 

[nirreich]

Stick to the issue at hand.

The settlers should never be in someone elses land. Most nations believe in the right of self defence when someone enters your land. Occupied people have the right to attack anyone on their land. Settlers should understand this and if they want to raise families in such an environment then it's their choice.

I see, this Palestinian "freedom fighter" exercised his self defence against an innocent baby... This is the philosophy of radical terrorists in a nutshell.

So murdering babies is OK as long as Palestinians or Muslims are behind it.

Your moral standards are of the middle ages, I invite you to join the rest of human kind in modern times.

 

[Kazhugu]

it doesnt look like that... if it was your problem you wouldn't say what you said. they need thay money and you make fun of it and say "so what..."

look first of all the arab states are gonna do nothing...this is just empty rhetoric from them.....if they really wanted they could have solved this issue one way or the other...but today the arabs are more worried about iran than israel and are ready to co-opt with israel to solve the iran threat....so damaging diplomatic relations with india just because it doesnt support palestine is ridiculous......

having said that our economy is booming and we can very well take care of the low skilled laborrers in case the arbis grow some spine and deport them back enmasse......

i dont know, why dont you ask those who does it, let it be hamas or israel.

you make it sound like hamas is the only one killing innocent people and babies, israel have also done that. condemn that to!

we can argue that israel dont intentionally aim at civilians... but however a civilian life loss is a civilian life lost. arguing if it was right to kill a civilian or not is just idiotic.

That is a more logical post than the previous ones...and i hope you will apply the logic to both palestinians and israelis....innocent life is innocent life....

but unfortunately most of the time i see the provocation is from the palestinian side and israel is merely retaliating although you can argue in a disproportionate manner....

 

[ovarel]

I see, this Palestinian "freedom fighter" exercised his self defence against an innocent baby... This is the philosophy of radical terrorists in a nutshell.

So murdering babies is OK as long as Palestinians or Muslims are behind it.

Your moral standards are of the middle ages, I invite you to join the rest of human kind in modern times.

The same can be said about you.

Anyways.
If the dead man was alive,i would ask him that what the fuk is he doing in anothers land,why did he bring his baby there,doesnt he have shame to raise his child in a place that he stole?

His child died because of him.

 

[nirreich]

The same can be said about you.

Anyways.
If the dead man was alive,i would ask him that what the fuk is he doing in anothers land,why did he bring his baby there,doesnt he have shame to raise his child in a place that he stole?

His child died because of him.

He did not steal anything, so stop both with your lies and with giving justifications for baby butchers like Palestinians terrorists.

 

[ovarel]

He did not steal anything, so stop both with your lies and with giving justifications for baby butchers like Palestinians terrorists.

Settlements are the buildings on a stolen land,international law says that.

You guys have no shame when talking about baby butchering. "Children gaza died" google it and look at the pictures,look closer you sick terrorist. There is no bigger terror-supporter than you.

 

[ptldM3]

The same can be said about you.

Anyways.
If the dead man was alive,i would ask him that what the fuk is he doing in anothers land,why did he bring his baby there,doesnt he have shame to raise his child in a place that he stole?

His child died because of him.

And Turkey has never occupied land that did not belong to them? The Ottoman empire does not sound familiar?

 

[nirreich]

Settlements are the buildings on a stolen land,international law says that.

You guys have no shame when talking about baby butchering. "Children gaza died" google it and look at the pictures,look closer you sick terrorist. There is no bigger terror-supporter than you.

Again you do not have a problem when babies are butchered as long as their Jewish and not "precious" Muslim.

According to international the settlements are not on a stolen land but in disputed area, so every side has claims for it.

In any case, being a settler, not to mention a baby of a settler, do not automatically makes you a legitimate target for all kind of barbaric psychopaths like Palestinians terrorists.

If you cannot see that then you are part of this revolting group of barbaric and fanatics

 

[ovarel]

And Turkey has never occupied land that did not belong to them? The Ottoman empire does not sound familiar?

Comapring different centuries is illogical and its so low.

 

[PteX]

Ptex, I hope you are not looking for sympathy on PDF. This is exactly why I don't give a crap about Israelis or Palestinians. No one looks at the issue from humanitarian POV. If Palestinian were Christians, all the people weeping here won't even know where it is located on world map. US will dump Israel in second if not for Jerusalem. As for as I am concerned, carry on. There will never be a solution because we have Muslims victims or Jewish victims, not human victims.

Not sympathy, no. Just a bit of information for a study.

And about US dumping Israel if not for Jerusalem, not sure how you got that conclusion since all the administrations want us to give half of Jerusalem to appease the Arabs.
No, the US became our ally because they saw us as a strong and dependable ally, they saw we never lost and kept winning against all odds and they wanted to have a friend like that in the most volatile and important region of the world.

 

[EastWest]

My God !!!

Such a hatred among muslims out here...
There is a small child dead out there...if a muslim kid was dead, u would have all kinds of nasty things being said..
What wa the fault of this small baby..just because he was born a jewish..he deserved to die according to these retards here..such sick mentality ..now i know the Palestinians who deserve justice will never get one...

 

[ovarel]

Again you do not have a problem when babies are butchered as long as their Jewish and not "precious" Muslim.

According to international the settlements are not on a stolen land but in disputed area, so every side has claims for it.

In any case, being a settler, not to mention a baby of a settler, do not automatically makes you a legitimate target for all kind of barbaric psychopaths like Palestinians terrorists.

If you cannot see that then you are part of this revolting group of barbaric and fanatics

Under international law,even East Jerusalem is occupied territory.

And again,the same can be said about you. You are the ocuppiers,you have killed much more civilians and babies than palestinians have,yet you are with no shame talking about butchering babies and blaming them as "palestinian terrorists."

If killing babies is terrorism then you are the biggest terrorists. Also we can say that this issue is accidental despite its an irresponsible action.