Idiotism is making blank statements, erroneously confusing video cameras with display monitors and not fully knowing what happened.
You idiot think that monitor can show video without cameras.
http://www.worldinwar.eu/pantsir-s1/
Modernized system for the Armed Forces and for export.
Incorporates news tracking radar, 2 faced radars with enhanced features and range. In service with Russia and Algeria.
Unbelievable how you lie.....new Pantsirs have a new missile with more then double the range as well as increased detection range. Nice try.
The Pantsir-SM variant incorporates a multi-functional targeting station, increasing target detection range from 40 to 75 km (25 to 47 mi)
and engagement range from 20 to 40 km (12 to 25 mi). The system also uses a new high-speed extended range missile.
Pantsir SM is not ready yet. Also increased range is pure nonsense. Because radio guided missiles are simply not effective at such ranges. In fact even 20 km is too big for radio guided missiles. In physics law. Thats why everyone use seekers today and only Russian propagandists are trying to sell WW2 radio guidance like some magic.
Also if you increase range to 40 km u need twise bigger booster. Means u increase twice a minimum range for Pantsir.
No you don't, 20,000-30,000 feet is plenty of altitude to drop glide bombs which would would take around 30 seconds or less for an F-16 to reach that altitude. Once they are dropped they would take a minutes to reach their intended targets, in the mean time Israel would give their advanced "warning" of a strike at that time F-16s would already be landing, well out of Pantsir reach and not enough time or altitude for S-200 be much of a threat.
Israel gives warning before releasing weapons.
Here is video screen grab from one Israeli bomb aimed at an empty Pantsir. From the other side another Israel missile impacts the Pantsir, so even from Israeli footage they use multiple missiles to attack a single Pantsir which indicates low first hit probability but continue to make absurdities about how it's normal to use countless missiles to strike a single air defense battery.
This video shows that Pantsir is successfully hit with two missiles. Pantsir failed to shot down both.
There is ZERO evidence that Pantsir managed to shoot down something EVER. Out of over 1000 missiles and bobs dropped on Assadists.
Apart from wreckage of Israeli missile I will just show this:
A missile exploded in the air and then you see an explosion on the ground which is 99% probably the Israeli warhead that failed to detonate when it was hit. Let me guess though, it's Assadist missile, Pantsir warhead magically explodes like 500lbs warhead. Other then that there is wreckage of Israeli bombs and F-16, but Syrian air defenses don't work and Israeli aircraft blitz Pantsirs with barrages of missiles for fun.
So we see two pics here:
1) SAM exploding in the air.
2) Explosion on the ground.
You really believe that it proof something? Explosion on the ground can be either Assad SAM hitting ground (which happens all the time), or Israeli missiles successfully hitting its target.
Out of over 1000 missiles and bombs dropped on Assadists fo far they managed to show only 1 shot down glide bomb. Thats fact.
No you are ignorant and can't read appearently. Learn the difference between a display monitor and a camera.
"There is no such thing as Pantsir cam. I doubt anyone would place video stands and camera equipment inside a crowded air defense batteries during when its under attack."
You mentioned a camera, and nothing about display monitors (don't put words in my mouth or try to wiggle your way out now) I then questioned as to why Syrians would place video cameras and equipment in a crowded air defense battery. If you read between the lines I was hinting as to why they would film their display monitors. I never denied Pantsir has display monitors, in fact I questioned why they would film them but it's amazing how poor of an argument you make and how you confuse simple terminology and then try to pin blame on me.
You idiot seriously believe that display can show video without camera? Even rebels with ancient OSA showed video of how they shoot down Assadist helicopter. But Assadists with newest super duper Pantsirs never could show a video shooting down anything.
This devide on top of Pantsir has
3 cameras actually:
Narrow FOV CCD camera.
Wide FOV CCD camera.
Thermal image camera.
These cameras are tracking the target together with the radar.
Again stop with the embarrassing claims. No one attacks a SAM battery with 2 or 3 missiles simultaneously if 1 will do the job. Bombing a hill side is completely different from hitting a Pantsir. On a hill side there could be groups of enemy fighters hundreds of yards apart, its necessary to use multiple strikes in those situations---not nessesary to use a million missiles on a single air battery if you are 100% confident on a first hit.
Pantsir was destroyed by two missiles without being able to hit any of them. You consider it as big success and try to prove that it means that Pantsir is great. LOL.
Here one target in Gaza was attacked by two Spike missiles:
So wut?
You are again quoting Israeli figures, which have been known to make grand lies during war time. Also even if we take Israeli claims at face value, Israel destroyed hundreds of Arab aircraft on the ground. Nothing to do with technology but rather planning and training. Ask some Pakistani pilots about superior Israeli technology and pilots.
In Yom Kippur war Israel lost 102 jets, Arab loses are between 340-500 jets. Thats your biggest success ever that makes u wet in the pants.
