What's new

Israel to Demand Apology for ‘Anti-Semitic’ Netanyahu Cartoon

Hasbara Buster

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
-7
Israel to Demand Apology for ‘Anti-Semitic’ Netanyahu Cartoon

TIMES-CARTOON.jpg


The Sunday Times ‘crossed a red line,’ says Ambassador to UK Daniel Taub; Knesset Speaker Rivlin lodges complaint with British counterpart

By Raphael Ahren

January 29, 2013 "Times Of Israel" -- Israel is planning to demand an apology for a controversial cartoon that appeared in the British Sunday Times, Israel’s ambassador to London said Monday, while one minister mulled steps against the paper.

One day after the caricature sparked outrage among Jewish groups for its depiction of a bloodthirsty Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu building a wall with the blood and bodies of Palestinians, leading Israelis joined the chorus of condemnation.

“The newspaper should apologize for this. We’re not going to let this stand as it is,” Israeli Ambassador to London Daniel Taub told The Times of Israel in a telephone interview. “We genuinely think that a red line has been crossed and the obligation on the newspaper is to correct that.”

Taub added that he was going to meet with the newspaper’s editor “at the earliest opportunity, perhaps already today,” to express the government’s concern about a cartoon that draws “on classical anti-Semitic themes.”

In a meeting Monday with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Tony Blair, the representative of the Middle East quartet who’s also a former British premier, deplored the caricature, noting the timing of its publication on International Holocaust Remembrance Day, according to a press release from the Prime Minister’s Office

Earlier on Monday, Public Diplomacy and Diaspora Affairs Minister Yuli Edelstein told Army Radio that the government would probably refrain from filing an official complaint with the London-based paper. However, he said, “We will think about how to act against the paper’s representative here in Israel.”

The cartoon is “certainly” anti-Semitic, Edelstein asserted. “I don’t think there is any other possible way to interpret it,” he said, adding that its publication on International Holocaust Remembrance Day was particularly hurtful, a sentiment shared by Taub.

Responding to an outcry from Jewish groups — Efraim Zuroff, director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Israel office, called the cartoon “absolutely disgusting” and said it “makes all the talk of fighting anti-Semitism seem irrelevant,” and Michael Salberg of the Anti-Defamation League said “The Sunday Times has clearly lost its moral bearings — a spokesman for the newspaper told The Times of Israel Sunday the cartoon was not anti-Semitic but critical of the prime minister’s policies, as it was “aimed squarely at Mr. Netanyahu and his policies, not at Israel, let alone at Jewish people.”

Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin wrote a letter Monday to his British counterpart, Speaker of the House of Commons John Bercow, expressing the Israeli people’s “extreme outrage” at the cartoon, which was drawn by veteran caricaturist Gerald Scarfe.

“For me and for other Israelis, this cartoon was reminiscent of the vicious journalism during one of the darkest periods in human history,” Rivlin wrote. While government authorities should not attempt to control the media and must grant freedom of speech, many Israelis are “shocked that such cartoons can be published in such a respectable newspaper in the Great Britain of today, fearing that such an event is testimony to sick undercurrents in British society.”

Scarfe’s cartoon, captioned “Israeli elections: Will cementing peace continue?”, “blatantly crossed the line of freedom of expression,” Rivlin added.

Jewish Agency chairman Natan Sharansky drew a direct connection between the cartoon and the increase in anti-Semitic violence that took place in 2012.

“There is a very tragic alliance between primitive, anti-democratic, nationalist, racist, fundamentalist forces who are committing most of the violence, and enlightened, liberal, intellectual representatives of the intelligentsia in Europe,” Sharansky told The Times of Israel. By using clear double standards towards Israel, Western intellectuals evidently accept the delegitimization of Israel and are thus “helping to justify” anti-Jewish violence, he said. While Israel respects other nations’ right to freedom of speech, it is was “necessary and important” to label people such as Scarfe, the cartoonist, as anti-Semites, he added.

Some Israelis came to Scarfe’s defense. Haaretz correspondent Anshel Pfeffer listed several reasons the cartoon was “not anti-Semitic by any standard”: the cartoon, he argued, isn’t directed at Jews, features no Jewish symbols and does not use Holocaust imagery.

Rupert Murdoch, the billionaire CEO of News Corp., which owns The Times, nevertheless tweeted a harshly worded apology.

Link apology: http://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=rupertmurdoch

Nissim “Nusko” Hezkiyahu, one of Israel’s most famous caricaturists, defended Scarfe. While Sunday’s cartoon turned his stomach, it is not anti-Semitic, Hezkiyahu told Army Radio. “You need to know this man. He wasn’t born yesterday nor did he start publishing caricatures yesterday,” Hezkiyahu said. “We’re talking about Gerald Scarfe, one of the world’s most famous caricaturists, who doesn’t just make fun of Bibi” but of many politicians, and he treats them all equally disrespectfully. “If you look at the other caricatures, Bibi came off easy.”

“To say that this caricature shows Bibi with a big nose — compared to all the caricatures that are published here, I think that was the smallest nose he ever had,” Hezkiyahu said.

The fact that the cartoon was published on a day on which the world remembers the Holocaust was unfortunate, but most likely not the fault of the cartoonist but of the editor, Hezkiyahu added.

Taub, Israel’s ambassador in London, acknowledged that Scarfe is famous for politically incorrect drawings but said that the depiction of Netanyahu went too far. “Scarfe is known to be provocative, but I think that even according to his own provocative standards, this is a cartoon that crosses any line,” Taub said. “What is very troubling is that fact that these are things that we have become accustomed to see only really only at the extreme end of society, the most extreme elements on the fringes. And to see them in a respected newspaper like the Sunday Times, which is really in the heart of mainstream, is very troubling indeed.”

© 2013 The Times of Israel, All rights reserved

See also -

French poll: 40% say Jews too powerful in business:

French poll: 40% say Jews too powerful in business - Israel Jewish Scene, Ynetnews

Survey conducted by World Zionist Organization ahead of International Day for Countering Anti-Semitism shows 47% of France's population believe local Jews are 'more loyal to Israel than to the country they live in'

Israel to Demand Apology for ‘Anti-Semitic’ Netanyahu Cartoon
 
. .
Hmm, what's that you say? Offensive items were made towards Jewish people and no one is rioting, making death threats, burning down embassies, etc , but instead behaving in a civil manner? Interesting.
 
. .
Bet me this is probably relate to racial segregation again..... These newspaper should have just lay it down. There we go another xenophobia reaction.
 
.
Hmm, what's that you say? Offensive items were made towards Jewish people and no one is rioting, making death threats, burning down embassies, etc , but instead behaving in a civil manner? Interesting.

right and how exactly is it offensive to jewish except the evil guy ofcourse?
 
.
right and how exactly is it offensive to jewish except the evil guy ofcourse?

The same way that anything is offensive to anyone. People say the same thing about the video that took place when the rioting happened.
 
.
Well, Netanyahu isn't no King David, or King Solomon. Is he? Don't mix chalk and cheese. Not each and everything / everyone critical of the atrocities committed by the Jewish state can be attributed to anti-semitism. Anti-Semitism, might in-fact be the most abused word in the world right now to get away scott free with murder.

Btw, I am no fan of Arabs, however, you people are no different than them. They try to stone anything that moves, and you people have been crying "injustice" for over a century and feeding upon the genuine initial sympathy that came your way. Stop milking it further. Good look to all the cursed lands. Yes, this includes Arabia as well.

Hmm, what's that you say? Offensive items were made towards Jewish people and no one is rioting, making death threats, burning down embassies, etc , but instead behaving in a civil manner? Interesting.
 
.
The same way that anything is offensive to anyone. People say the same thing about the video that took place when the rioting happened.

Do they have to? Firstly, the cartoon is not of the same nature of those Danish anti-Islam cartoons. They target neither Judaism nor Jews as a people, but only Netanyahu as a politician. I'm yet to see any Arabs or Muslims rioting over a bad depiction of the heads of states of their countries. Secondly, the cartoon has already been withdrawn, and Rupert Murdoch, the Sunday Time's owner and a well known Goy Zionist, has taken up to Twitter to apologize over the cartoon. This is very meaningful, since other media outlets that he owns -- Fox News, for example -- regularly target other minorities for incitement (for example, Blacks, Hispanics and Muslims), and he has never had to apologize over it before. It's apparently only the Jews' sensitivities that matter to him.

The same is true about Western newspapers. None of them will publish anti-Jewish discourse on the same level of the anti-Muslim stuff they occasionally release. Charlie Hebdo has published anti-Muslim cartoons twice in very recent memory; though most French parties condemned this decision, they have defended his right to freedom of speech. Now try to publish Holocaust denial stuff, and see how many political parties, in France and in the broader EU, will defend your rights to free speech. None will. In fact, when Western newspapers, in a self-martyred attitude, make a point about freedom of speech, it's never Jews, Christians or the Holocaust that they target for abuse or mockery -- it's always Muslims. Everyone in Europe, politicians and private media outlets owners alike, will bow down to Jewish demands to keep the Holocaust memory sacred, above democratic discussion. Why riot, when you already have all those who matter, including censors, on your side?

As some have noticed, those (among whom there are many many of the Jewish establishment) who made the 'heroic' defense of the Danish newspaper to publish anti-Muslim stuff -- those who said the newspaper had not only a right but even a duty to pick on Muslims -- are at this moment bitching about the Sudan Time's "insensivity" in releasing that cartoon -- and "on Holocaust Day!".

I agree with Noam Chomsky; at least when it comes to free speech, Americans are incomparably superior to Europeans. Europeans haven't even begun to grasp what freedom of speech really is:

"... in Europe freedom of speech and freedom of the press is barely protected, in fact barely understood . . . In fact this is one respect where the United States really stands out. It is the only country I know of which there is real judicial protection for freedom of speech. . . . the main countries in Europe don’t have it. And even the concept is not understood, literally, it’s not understood. One example, which is far from the worst: the British passed a law, it hasn’t been implemented yet, there is some debate about how to formulate it. But the Blair government is going to push a law making it a crime to glorify terrorism. When a Muslim cleric was imprisoned recently on charges of having glorified terrorism, the London Guardian had a lead editorial praising the judicial decision because people shouldn’t be permitted to spew hatred and to glorify violent acts, they should be stopped. Under that law virtually all the British press and publishers should be closed down. Do they incite hatred and violence? Yes. Do they support invading Iraq? Yes. That is supporting hatred and violence. I mean everyone agrees that even how awful terrorism is, aggression is far more severe than terrorism. So therefore if glorifying terrorism is a crime and inciting popular support for terrorism is a crime, then glorifying aggression, and helping incite popular support for aggression is a far more severe crime. Why don’t we put them all in jail? Do you hear anybody talking about that? No, and the reason is that nobody cares about freedom of speech. What they care about is using state power to shut down the kind of speech they don’t like. Even Stalin would have agreed with that."
 
. .
It is tragicomical that anti-Semitic is solely used to describe hatred towards Jews while the Western media seems to have a hard time realizing that we Arabs ourselves are Semitic people and 25-30 as numerous as the Jews and other Semitic people.

They should use anti-ZIONISM instead!
 
.
israel always starts wars for election but this is anti semetic considering it clearly parallels nazi proganda and the artist should have known better.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom