That is just yr bias view... So as the author who post this article. What can Israel offer in technology? Lol..
I believe I did already list what Israel can offer in terms of technology, and you've conveniently ignored half of what I wrote.
As for me being "bias": do tell me how you've arrived at that conclusion. I've merely pointed out that even your government, the CPC, apparently do not agree with your views, considering they are pursuing better ties with Israel on a military and social front. I suppose I'll have to elaborate.
We can even design and build our constellation satelite and GPS system. We have also demonstrated our own missile defence shield and not to mention ASAT.
Being able to build and launch satellites is undoubtedly impressive, but several nations without the capacity to put them into orbit have achieved similar satellite coverage through the simple act of renting cargo on an outbound rocket launched by a friendly nation. You can call it whatever you like, but that's a pretty intelligent way of going about things.
As far as your "missile defence shield" is concerned, most of your air defence systems are based off of Russian/Soviet origin weapons. The more modern ones are modified S-300 Gargoyle/Giant systems, and the KS-1 isn't even close to as advanced as the Israeli Green Pine, let alone a system like Iron Dome. The KS-1 utilizes a passive phased array system of limited detection and tracking range, unlike the Green Pine, which uses an
active phased array radar with about double the tracking range of your KS-1, and superior tracking numbers.
Then there are multiple systems which are copies of the American "Avenger" and "Hawk" systems, the French "Croatle" SAM system (1970s tech, that one), Italian "Aspide" system, etc. etc. etc. So yes, you have "missile defence shields", but considering the antiquity of half the systems, and the lower efficiency of the newer ones, its a bit rich to dismiss Israeli systems as "inadequate".
As for the engine, the Russian are selling us good price for the engine and why shall china refused. We have a huge appetite for engine. The 123 Al-31FN is just nice to supplement our domestic engine.
And yet, a huge appetite hasn't caused China to go abroad for suplamentary production before. You wanted more J-11s, so you just started producing them inhouse. You needed carrier fighters, so you did it, once again, wihtin your own nation. And suddenly you're unable to produce enough engines to slake your thirst for jet engines? No, there's something else at work here.
If our domestic engine is no good. Our J-11B will be grounded by now but true is its running fine , all thanks to our domestic WS-10a engine.
Right, and you do realise that the Al-31FN is the version of the Saturn engine specifically modified to use on the J-10, don't you? I am actually inclined to believe that the engine works due to evidence of it running posted on other threads. But the engine apparently has enough deficiencies to prevent a J-10 installation. Sure, test flights have been performed, but following them, the decision seems to have been made to limit the installation on the twin-engined J-11Bs instead.
And do you have evidence corroborating your claim that the engines are "running fine"? Are they spooling up efficiently? Is the engine able to maintain the required pressure, and inlet temperature? Is the thrust generated at a sufficient rate to match or surpase the performance of the AL-31 series? Do enlighten me, I'm eager to know more.