Armstrong
RETIRED TTA
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 19,390
- Reaction score
- 94
- Country
- Location
Well if u think that tin cans are good protection then yes.
Hey can't a coating of ERA tiles be attached to that area ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well if u think that tin cans are good protection then yes.
This what happens when people with no combat experience design tanks .
Thats just non sense.Low speed are ignored.
Turret side armor is non existant:
This what happens when people with no combat experience design tanks .
well russian tanks have no side armor if not mistaken the French leclerc does not have it too or minor armor just like your merkavah.The only experience they got is running from noth koreans 60 years ago.
If they had experience they would not design a tank without side armor.
stop with the trolling boycan we expect to see a future model that can hover and fly?
it could be targeted by snipers
it could be targeted by snipers
Current western tanks are built using rich experience from previous wars: WW2, Korea, Indo-Pak, Arab-Israeli. Counter insurgency it is also experience.No currently employed western tank has ever fought against a comparable enemy.
Yep it proved. I can tell you that turret side of Merkava 4 resisted Kornet hits during the war. No other tank can do that.And hope that it stays that way. If you call any combat to be sufficient for the "combat proven" mark, then Hizbullah has proved Merkava
Its a nice tank, you can see it has decent turret side armor unlike K-2 joke.Altay Main Battle Tank
Everything possible.Hey can't a coating of ERA tiles be attached to that area ?
Thats fact.Thats just non sense.
Russian tanks have slopped sides.well russian tanks have no side armor.
You are mistaken.if not mistaken the French leclerc does not have it
i think in open war this system will not be effective you have hundreds of AT firing at brigades of tanks i think this system is for hezbollah and hamas (gurrela warfare )A sniper won't break it completely however at best it can decrese it's effectiveness and its 360 degrees monitoring capability.
The best way to bypass this system is to send two Anti-Tank ordinances at the same time following each other because the system locks on and targets and fires at one target at a time....as of now at least.
what will happen in 2006 warRpg-7 cannot even penetrate Merkava Mark I which was build in the 70s.
What can cause real damage to any modern tank in the world is very expensive RPG-30 and kornet-E. But this is way IDF order Anti tank missile protection
All biases aside, I think Merkava-IV has one of the best designed turret, even better than K-2, Leopard 2A6... I can't know the detail secret informations or other parameters to compare between eachothers but In accordance with the shapes of turrets, It is a revolutionary design.
they wanted to make the tank as low as possible to make it hard to get hit and become a smaller targetWhat always puzzled me was the step like layered armor of the Merkeva, what exactly is the reason for this? My knowledge regarding Tank designs is lacking so would like to know why the Merkeva turret is designed this way (benefits) and why the K2 design is not good.