Israel delegation boycotts Nawaz Speech

[Anotherangle]

Not a surprise at all; we do not accept Israel as a country and our passports make it clear that they are for all the world except Israel, so such diplomatic maneuver is the least that country can do in the response.

Dear sipah e mohammed, to PDForum, now please go to the forum home page and introduce yourself in the member introduction thread

......

 

[Sugarcane]

Huh? Has this Pakistani PM even read the relevant UN Resolutions? The United Nations Security Council Resolution 47, was adopted on April 21, 1948, after hearing arguments from both India and Pakistan.

The resolution recommended that in order to ensure the impartiality of the plebiscite, Pakistan will withdraw all tribesmen and nationals who entered the region for the purpose of fighting and that India leave only the minimum number of troops needed to keep civil order.

But Pakistan has yet to withdraw its forces from that portion of Kashmir that it now still occupies, as required by the Resolution (Signed by both India and Pakistan), till this day!

Nuff said!

Your reaction tells that purpose is achieved

@ Topic : Good speech - And Israel country doesn't exist in Pakistan's dictionary - so doesn't matter

 

[Secur]

So the news turned out to be true? Hah! Nawaz isn't the friendliest guy the Israeli delegation could find, he was furious prior to Youm-e-takbeer as the ISI found out that the IDF was plotting on something against Pakistan's nuclear infrastructure.

Well , Israel's a small country , ai'nt it ? Pakistanis would still have survived but I cant say the same about Haifa , Damona and Tel Aviv if the IDF or Mossad chose to target any nuclear infrastructure back then . The Knesset quickly understood where would Israel had been left then .

 

[Yzd Khalifa]

Well , Israel's a small country , ai'nt it ? Pakistanis would still have survived but I cant say the same about Haifa , Damona and Tel Aviv if the IDF or Mossad chose to target any nuclear infrastructure back then . The Knesset quickly understood where would Israel had been left then .

Pakistanis would still survive ? Their aim was to destroy Pakistan's nuclear infrastructure, not to use atomic weapons against the latter.

 

[anonymus]

False News.

Guys, I typed Israel boycotts + UN + Nawaz and guess what, the only link that was there was of this forum, no one else;not even local pakistani media.


This is an attempt of mushrikeen @Zarvan to have some mental orgasm while the expense of other forum members.

 

[Sugarcane]

False News.

Guys, I typed Israel boycotts + UN + Nawaz and guess what, the only link that was there was of this forum, no one else;not even local pakistani media.


This is an attempt of mushrikeen @zaravan to have some mental orgasm while the expense of other forum members.

Hence proved that PDF is better than main stream media to keep an eye on whats happening around the globe.

 

[anonymus]

Hence proved that PDF is better than main stream media to keep an eye on whats happening around the globe.

 

[xyxmt]

Huh? Has this Pakistani PM even read the relevant UN Resolutions? The United Nations Security Council Resolution 47, was adopted on April 21, 1948, after hearing arguments from both India and Pakistan.

The resolution recommended that in order to ensure the impartiality of the plebiscite, Pakistan will withdraw all tribesmen and nationals who entered the region for the purpose of fighting and that India leave only the minimum number of troops needed to keep civil order.

But Pakistan has yet to withdraw its forces from that portion of Kashmir that it now still occupies, as required by the Resolution (Signed by both India and Pakistan), till this day!

Nuff said!

Duuudeee!! call him, let him now, he made a blunder!!
or maybe its same as most people cannot understand Indian engliss indian cannot understand a resolution written in white English and draw their own conclusion the way it suits them

 

[wakapdf]

We have nothing against Israel and nor do they have anything against us. But if they do such petty things to score points against us, we will kindly return the favor (possibly with interest)...

 

[qamar1990]

After Yaseer Arafat many countries have lowered the tone n tenor of support for Palestine, this step by Pakistan keeping it on front burner is not a wise step diplomatically

why not? israel will be mad with us? who cares lol, india kissed israeli *** left and right and in the end of the day they have nothing that we don't have, they aren't that far off better then we aren't, in other words we are still at the same level.

 

[qamar1990]

Pakistanis would still survive ? Their aim was to destroy Pakistan's nuclear infrastructure, not to use atomic weapons against the latter.

pakistan can and will defeat israel with or without nuclear weapons. if they had attacked us in anyway then pakistan would have retaliated with full force on both israel and india.

We have nothing against Israel and nor do they have anything against us. But if they do such petty things to score points against us, we will kindly return the favor (possibly with interest)...

i mean yeah you right besides the fact that they aided india during kargil, they tried to bomb our nuclear facilities but besides national security and what not pakistan and israel have nothing against each other.

 

[HRK]

Huh? Has this Pakistani PM even read the relevant UN Resolutions? The United Nations Security Council Resolution 47, was adopted on April 21, 1948, after hearing arguments from both India and Pakistan.

The resolution recommended that in order to ensure the impartiality of the plebiscite, Pakistan will withdraw all tribesmen and nationals who entered the region for the purpose of fighting and that India leave only the minimum number of troops needed to keep civil order.

But Pakistan has yet to withdraw its forces from that portion of Kashmir that it now still occupies, as required by the Resolution (Signed by both India and Pakistan), till this day!

Nuff said!

Pakistan has fulfilled its responsibility of withdrawing tribesmen from the valley........has India dropped number of its tropes to the minimum level .....???

In addition to this other responsibilities with which Indian agreed are

official link from UN website: http://www.un.org/en/sc/repertoire/46-51/Chapter%208/46-51_08-16-The%20India-Pakistan%20question.pdf

hope next time you will post whole document if find it necessary to discuss...... after all your are "senior member"

 

[Cyberian]

Israel is an illegitimate state, it shouldn't be even allowed a seat at the United Nations. Prime Mnister Nawaz spoke like a true Muslim leader of the only Islamic nuclear power.

 

[OrionHunter]

Pakistan has fulfilled its responsibility of withdrawing tribesmen from the valley........has India dropped number of its tropes to the minimum level .....???

In addition to this other responsibilities with which Indian agreed are

official link from UN website: http://www.un.org/en/sc/repertoire/46-51/Chapter%208/46-51_08-16-The%20India-Pakistan%20question.pdf

hope next time you will post whole document if find it necessary to discuss...... after all your are "senior member"

And here's the preamble of the SC Resolution. What you reproduced is an attempt by you to obfuscate the issue. Here, read this and try and comprehend the simple English within...

Have you withdrawn your forces and nationals from that portion of Kashmir that you illegally still occupy? NO! So where is the question of a plebiscite?

Secondly, the resolution was passed by United Nations Security Council under chapter VI of UN Charter. Resolutions passed under Chapter VI of UN charter are considered non binding and have no mandatory enforceability as opposed to the resolutions passed under Chapter VII.

Now why did Pakistan's representatives agree to sign the Resolutions under chapter VI which are non binding and have no mandatory enforceability instead of Chapter 7 which would have been binding on both parties? You'll blame India for that too?

EPIC FAIL on Pakistan's part!!

 

[Icewolf]

And here's the preamble of the SC Resolution. What you reproduced is an attempt by you to obfuscate the issue. Here, read this and try and try and comprehend the simple English within...

Have you withdrawn your forces and nationals from that portion of Kashmir that you illegally still occupy? NO! So wher is the question of a plebiscite?

Secondly, the resolution was passed by United Nations Security Council under chapter VI of UN Charter. Resolutions passed under Chapter VI of UN charter are considered non binding and have no mandatory enforceability as opposed to the resolutions passed under Chapter VII.

Now why did Pakistan's representatives agree to sign the Resolutions under chapter VI which are non binding and have no mandatory enforceability instead of Chapter 7 which would have been binding on both parties? You'll blame India for that too?

EPIC FAIL on Pakistan's part!!

Yeah right we will never take out forces from Kashmir until India stops occupying Kashmir and stops killing innocent civilians