What's new

ISPR & GEO cooperation in entertainment media


So after all that abuse & drama, it's back to doing collabs just like with pmln/ppp/ptm. Then they & their poodles have the audacity to question why the awaam is furious at them & is supporting IK.

5th gEneRAtiOn wARfaRe
1652555799380.png
 
.
. .
Just for fun guys, this will never happen inshAllah.
Future ISPR documentaries and dramas.
1) Geo and ISPR making documentary on how lashkar used Pak soil to do terrorism in India.
2) Drama on how Pakistan and Indian army collectively destroyed terror camps in Pakistan and killed terrorist commanders.
 
.
Seems to be another part of Bajwa Doctrine.
 
. .
if you do also search for ebsynth its a auto rotoscoping plugin and for deepfake install deepfacelab or for fun just install reface app from android and meme away

This ebsynth thing looks great. Going to try with old family photos.

Thanks for the heads up!
 
. .
for reference watch this channel


Also made this for a client a while back easy 100bucks

Still its not that easy, the software just eases the rotoscoping, in the end manual fine tuning is required right?

You earned it with your skills, you dedicated your time, spent hours looking at screen.
 
.
Who's to say what's anti-state and what isn't? I disagree with your view here. And I think that soon you'll find ARY being the recipient of the old anti-state tag, given the current political dynamic. I personally don't call either of them anti-state though.

Unless we're talking about TPP/BLA types or separatists, being called "anti-state" in Pakistan might be a badge of honour. Even as far back as the 50s, people who spoke against the system that was being imposed were called traitors, names including political giants like GM Syed, AK Fazlul Haq, Suhrawardy, etc. These were actual poltiicans for the most part, not the spawn of dictators and generals' nurseries.

On topic - IMO, we're enough indoctrinated as a nation and could possibly do without yet another ISPR drama. Hell, I don't even know why ISPR is what it is. Only in Pakistan does everyone know who the COAS is, who the intel chief is and who the chief spokesman of the armed forces is.... all without ever knowing who the poor sod ("Minister") in charge of the MoD is.​

Mohtaram

So if some entity goes against the narrative of its own state, would you call it anti state? On top of that GEO is one of the groups who have received foreign funding as a document from National Endowment for democracy has revealed.

GEO media group has constantly gone against the state narrative and that is why it was banned for many years in military stations and officers' mess around the country.

Zaheer ul islam episode was one of many examples.

So, some of us have legitimate grounds to call GEO anti state. Now collaborating with a such an entity is questionable.
 
.
Production quality is shit regardless. But the cooperation is fascinating. Birds of a feather...
 
.
If "thooka huwa chaatna" had a face, it would be that of bajwa and the Pakistani establishment.
 
.
Mohtaram

So if some entity goes against the narrative of its own state, would you call it anti state? On top of that GEO is one of the groups who have received foreign funding as a document from National Endowment for democracy has revealed.

GEO media group has constantly gone against the state narrative and that is why it was banned for many years in military stations and officers' mess around the country.

Zaheer ul islam episode was one of many examples.

So, some of us have legitimate grounds to call GEO anti state. Now collaborating with a such an entity is questionable.
Right now IK is going against the narrative of his own state, would you call him anti-state? Can state narratives be wrong? Is it really treacherous to criticise your state in all circumstances? If the answer's "no". Then let's revert to the previous question? Who gets to decide what's anti-state and what isn't, I'm not worthy of judging anyone of that, hence I refrain.

Geo was banned for criticising the military in exactly the same way as IK is accusing them right now, ditto for the Zaheer ul Islam case, although he never once appeared before the courts despite many hearings.

Also, your claim about national endowment seems muddled up, the NED is the one who does int'l funding, they don't expose others' funding. So which incident are you referring to? A lot was said about Geo funding around 2014, nothing at all came of it. If all it takes is accusing or calling out sitting generals of meddling, to be called anti-state, then a good chunk of the polity, plus the ex-PM and his party have gone way beyond that already. So let's be consistent here.
 
.
Right now IK is going against the narrative of his own state, would you call him anti-state? Can state narratives be wrong? Is it really treacherous to criticise your state in all circumstances? If the answer's "no". Then let's revert to the previous question? Who gets to decide what's anti-state and what isn't, I'm not worthy of judging anyone of that, hence I refrain.

Geo was banned for criticising the military in exactly the same way as IK is accusing them right now, ditto for the Zaheer ul Islam case, although he never once appeared before the courts despite many hearings.

Also, your claim about national endowment seems muddled up, the NED is the one who does int'l funding, they don't expose others' funding. So which incident are you referring to? A lot was said about Geo funding around 2014, nothing at all came of it. If all it takes is accusing or calling out sitting generals of meddling, to be called anti-state, then a good chunk of the polity, plus the ex-PM and his party have gone way beyond that already. So let's be consistent here.

IK isn't going against narrative of his own state. The establishment isn't the state. The 220 million Pakistanis are.

On the other hand, Geo, its owner & his colleagues have promoted terrorists, separatist/ethnonationalists, false or misleading version of historical events, deliberately misleads viewers on economic & political matters, etc etc.

When army came out & said we're fighting 5th gen war, what do you think it was referring to? You'd 1st have to understand what 5th gen war is & we had assumed it did.
 
.

So after all that abuse & drama, it's back to doing collabs just like with pmln/ppp/ptm. Then they & their poodles have the audacity to question why the awaam is furious at them & is supporting IK.

5th gEneRAtiOn wARfaRe
View attachment 844004
Make a play in which you actually try to brainwash people that there is no sifarish in army. There is no corruption. But doing that you are instilling the opposite in youth. Your worship like appriciation for pma wont work. Neither the fake way of showinh how kind you are to minorities. While in reailty they can only work as cleaners in pma. .

Is drama main Bangladesh jeeta? Ya siachen jeeta. (fyi Pakistan didnt control an inch of siachen. Pakistan sits at the edge where the glacier starts.)
Or how you are going to loose next part of Pakistan.

Do you duty for god sake stop making dramas
 
.
Right now IK is going against the narrative of his own state, would you call him anti-state? Can state narratives be wrong? Is it really treacherous to criticise your state in all circumstances? If the answer's "no". Then let's revert to the previous question? Who gets to decide what's anti-state and what isn't, I'm not worthy of judging anyone of that, hence I refrain.

Geo was banned for criticising the military in exactly the same way as IK is accusing them right now, ditto for the Zaheer ul Islam case, although he never once appeared before the courts despite many hearings.

Also, your claim about national endowment seems muddled up, the NED is the one who does int'l funding, they don't expose others' funding. So which incident are you referring to? A lot was said about Geo funding around 2014, nothing at all came of it. If all it takes is accusing or calling out sitting generals of meddling, to be called anti-state, then a good chunk of the polity, plus the ex-PM and his party have gone way beyond that already. So let's be consistent here.

Mohataram,

So lets first determine the state narrative and its interests. Example: India is under a fascist hindu regime. Pakistan maintains that pathankot and mumbai attacks have nothing to do with its state actors.

Has IK disputed this and made them controversial? Just two examples. GEO and PMLN have repeatedly not only questioned this but pushed someone's else's narrative.

There is absolutely nothing common between PML-N and GEOs anti state narrative and IK's narrative who has not even mentioned any military official in a disparaging manner let alone running ISI's chief picture for 6 hours and accusing them of shooting Hamid Mir.

Whether its Kulbushan Yadav, Jindal scandal, Memogate, or Pathankot attack FIR and many more, PMLN and Geo have consistently peddled foreign narratives against its own state.

One has to respect the hindutvadi media who never go against their own state narrative.

My 'claim' of foreign funding is a fact. The document of National endowment fund for democracy is foreign funding. Why dont they promote democracy in India like this for example? Will india allow it?

Truth is a channel like GEO and a party like PMLN would never survive in a country like lets say india. Why should it be allowed in india and this is what Pakistanis are incensed about.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom