What's new

ISIS releases sickening video clip showing Syrian woman being stoned to death by Her Father

well this won't be the last time this happens
next time the father/brothers or whoever should invite the entire immediate family for a family reunion with drink,food, and entertainment, and at the end they all stone the adulteress :sarcastic::sarcastic:


fun times.
 
.
.
You mean the Iraq that invaded Kuwait and Saudi Arabia?

1. kuwait was historically under iraq... that was the iraqi claim.

2. saudia is a creation of usa and britain... it hosted usa military and continues to host criminals who have killed iraqis, libyans, syrians, afghanis, and so on... saudia is a criminal regime and must be removed... i think you know what muammar gaddafi said of saudia and its king.

The Iraq that then continually fired on United Nations aircraft patrolling the no-fly zones that Iraq agreed to?

there is no such thing like "united nations aircraft"... what certainly flew the iraqi skies were nato aircraft, bombing iraqi installation on iraqi land...

The Iraq that continued to boast of it's stockpile of weapons and who threw out UN inspectors

the iraqis only threw out "united nations" inspectors who were essentially spies for usa government... like that australian fellow.

the only decent man, i think, was hans blix.

edit : besides, how could sovereign iraq not have weapons when actual champion invaders had them in plenty??

Indeed, the first time his forces fired on US aircraft patrolling the no-fly zones, (which he more or less, continuously did from 1991 on.),

let me point out the irony... nato-imposed "no fly zone"... iraqi skies... iraqi land... iraqi people bombed... iraqi installations destroyed... depleted uranium... cancers among iraqis... "united nations of america", as saddam hussain called it.

all those issues were addressed by this best speech ever in the uno building... (
)... certainly one of the best speeches in history... muammar gaddafi, in his first and last appearance in the uno building.
 
Last edited:
.
KSA the US protectorate is the champion beheader in the world:
Saudi Arabia: Scheduled beheading reflects authorities’ callous disregard to human rights | Amnesty International

Is beheading any better than stoning? So how is KSA better than ISIS? Answer, they are both two sides of the same coin called Salafism, which the Brits helped support (Al-Saud) and the US made a deal with for cheap oil.

beheading is humane imo
i would welcome a good ole beheading as capital punishment in the states.
instead these murderers and rapists sit on death row for 30+years just to be injected with chemicals that is expensive and can be botched easily.

 
.
Is beheading any better than stoning? So how is KSA better than ISIS? Answer, they are both two sides of the same coin called Salafism, which the Brits helped support (Al-Saud) and the US made a deal with for cheap oil.
Stoning takes longer and the victims are accused of adultery (which is not a crime anyway as it doesn't harm anyone in anyway).
 
Last edited:
.
1. kuwait was historically under iraq... that was the iraqi claim.
Is that how it works? Saddam can simply "claim" that his neighbour is no longer a sovereign state and take it? Sorry, but that is not how it works and would even violate numerous agreements that Iraq signed, including with it's membership in the UN.

saudia is a creation of usa and britain... it hosted usa military and continues to host criminals who have killed iraqis, libyans, syrians, afghanis, and so on... saudia is a criminal regime and must be removed... i think you know what muammar gaddafi said of saudia and its king.
Saudi Arabia existed before the first real American contact there when President Franklin Roosevelt met with him during WWII. It was NOT the creation of the UK but was created by the sheer will and actions of King Ibn Saud. He was nobody’s puppet.

there is no such thing like "united nations aircraft"... what certainly flew the iraqi skies were nato aircraft, bombing iraqi installation on iraqi land...
Of course there is just as there was during the War in Korea in the early 1950's. Saddam's forces were ousted from Kuwait because it was so ordered through UN Resolution 678. Whether it used NATO troops, Saudi troops, Syrian troops, or Egyptian troops, their authority was derived from that United Nations resolution.

"If Iraq did not implement the resolution by 15 January 1991, Member States were authorised to use all necessary means to uphold and implement Resolution 660 (1990), requesting Member States to keep the Council informed on their decisions. This was the legal authorisation for the Gulf War, as Iraq did not withdraw by the deadline."

the iraqis only threw out "united nations" inspectors who were essentially spies for usa government.

Ah, another one of those, "America controls everything", people heh? :lol:

let me point out the irony... nato-imposed "no fly zone"... iraqi skies... iraqi land... iraqi people bombed... iraqi installations destroyed... depleted uranium... cancers among iraqis... "united nations of america", as saddam hussain called it.
This from the guy who caused the most destructive war in Middle-East history and who was a pariah to his neighbours, virtually ALL of whom, participated in the effort against Saddam.

all those issues were addressed by this best speech ever in the uno building... (
)... certainly one of the best speeches in history... muammar gaddafi, in his first and last appearance in the uno building.

Another good source for the support of peace and rights...

La Belle nightclub, Berlin 1986-bombed under Gaddafi's orders, 3KIA, over 200 injured.

_11161_la-belle-nightclub-3-9-2004.jpg


Pan Am 103-Mass murderer Ghaddafi-270 innocent men, women, and children, murdered by his agents. Many were young teens returning home for Christmas.
lockerbie395.jpg


UTA Flt. 772, 1989-Gaddafi orders bomb on civilian airliner over Africa. 170 innocent men, women and children murdered.
uta2.jpg


...among countless other acts of murder and terror by Gaddafi...

Yeah, I don't think I will bother to listen to any lectures on "rights" from a mass murderer. :disagree:
 
. .
@jamahir Gaddafi was a total scumbag. I still remember how he started killing his own people like birds when they opposed him in protests, while Ben Ali in Tunisia chose to bow out like a gentleman. I would have doubts about any idea that came out of this weirdo's brain.
 
.
Is that how it works? Saddam can simply "claim" that his neighbour is no longer a sovereign state and take it? Sorry, but that is not how it works and would even violate numerous agreements that Iraq signed, including with it's membership in the UN.

falklands war... so, russia, venezuela, syria, north korea, egypt etc should form a new grouping and invade britain because the british military tried to seize malvinas island from spain... not too long ago...

goa... portugal and all european nations can invade india because india in 1961 seized goa ( plus daman and diu ) which used to belong to portugal.

but why didn't usa arrange a military grouping to invade india?? was it because india is not socialist??

i am sure i can find other examples too.

Saudi Arabia existed before the first real American contact there when President Franklin Roosevelt met with him during WWII.

yes... yes... but the britishers had long reached out to the wahabi idiots, armed them, supported them politically, trained them... and then delivered them to usa government... very much like how the english east india company did with the deobandi mullahs in india... or with followers of dalai lama...

It was NOT the creation of the UK but was created by the sheer will and actions of King Ibn Saud. He was nobody’s puppet.

that will certainly will the hearts of the saudi members here and their admirers... ;)

Of course there is just as there was during the War in Korea in the early 1950's. Saddam's forces were ousted from Kuwait because it was so ordered through UN Resolution 678. Whether it used NATO troops, Saudi troops, Syrian troops, or Egyptian troops, their authority was derived from that United Nations resolution.

in that muammar speech video, he calls for the uno to be shifted elsewhere... and for the "security council" to be disbanded because it is undemocratic and because it has become the "terror council".

i listened to the uno talkings ( whichever resolution ) on the eve of the 2003 usa invasion of iraq... listened to that live on bbc world service radio... and like i quoted saddam before... united nations of america.

the korea war had two sides, yes?? and the western bloc side ( under uno label ) murdered four million north korea citizens and flattened its cities... so what should north korea do with this history??

Ah, another one of those, "America controls everything", people heh? :lol:

when did i say that?? there is a good population of humanity which is not controlled by usa government... will never be... hence the usa's large stockpile of nuclear warheads...

of course, there is the good old "victory by other means"... regime change.

why did you ignore my mentioning of the australian unscom chief inspector, richard butler?? he was a spy for nato...

1. UN inspectors in Iraq helped spy for the CIA - World Socialist Web Site

2. MI6 involved in spying against Iraq through UNSCOM - World Socialist Web Site

3. Richard Butler denounces Kofi Annan - World Socialist Web Site

This from the guy who caused the most destructive war in Middle-East history

who... khomenei?? george bush, father and son?? obomba??

and who was a pariah to his neighbours,

that is such a meaningless and overused world... just like "yes we can"...

virtually ALL of whom, participated in the effort against Saddam.

syrian military must be doing :hitwall: for their foolishness in participating.

...among countless other acts of murder and terror by Gaddafi...
Yeah, I don't think I will bother to listen to any lectures on "rights" from a mass murderer. :disagree:

muammar gaddafi and the libyan jamahiriya had made peace directly with the families of the lockerbie victims... he denied that he ordered it yet he made a peace settlement of a few billion dollars... and these families were threatened by british government for accepting... so, why do you want to bring that topic here and confuse people??

you are free to show pictures of the 200,000+ libyans murdered by nato-supported criminals just since 2011... i am free to show picture of abdul hakim belhaj, former head of nato-created lifg criminal group ( which tried to kill muammar gaddafi ) and later "defense minister" of the new nato-installed "transitional government" in libya... oh, yes... lifg group later merged with another cia creation... al-qaeda.

and it was your top government officer, madeleine albright, who said it was acceptable for western bloc to have killed 500,000 iraqi children.

---
again, i urge you to listen to the muammar uno speech.

@jamahir Gaddafi was a total scumbag. I still remember how he started killing his own people like birds when they opposed him in protests, while Ben Ali in Tunisia chose to bow out like a gentleman. I would have doubts about any idea that came out of this weirdo's brain.

and would you say all that about bashar al-assad and hugo chavez?? because they too took action against "their own people"...

below are the "democracy-loving" tunisians who replaced the "oppressor-dictator" ben ali...

169356411-ennahada-islamist-party-rally-in-ben-arous-gettyimages.jpg


salafibanner.jpg


My Two Weeks With the Jihadists - The Atlantic

they are of the "ennahada party", derivation of "ikhwaan ul-muslimoon", children of qutb, maudoodi and british government... are you their fan?? or do you want to rocket them, like i do??

and the below tunisian ladies don't like them too...

ennahda_tunisia_women.jpg


Bild_3_Feministinnen_Reuters_730x220.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Again wrong. if it is claimed that the message is universal, it will not depends on me. The meaning should be same. I just want to know the truth, not the interpretation.


But I have seen other interpretations too. Are they wrong ?
sry i replied with my sleep eyes..anyway what i knw is both r true..ie u should protect the innocent..n same goes for the believer.. You ought to protect the believer. Whats wrong do you see in it?
@Jf Thunder
 
. .
yes... yes... but the britishers had long reached out to the wahabi idiots, armed them, supported them politically, trained them... and then delivered them to usa government... very much like how the english east india company did with the deobandi mullahs in india... or with followers of dalai lama...

The only reason Yemen, Iraq, Jordan and the rest of the GCC still exist today is thanks to the British pleading Abdulaziz not to invade their protectorates at the time.

In fact the first air bombings in Arabia's history was done by the British against King Abdulaziz's army that was unifying Hijaz. The British actively fought against King Abdulaziz until a deal was made where he will contend with his territory and that in return they would leave him alone.

This whole BS of "British supported and British funded" is nothing short of total historical ignorance. Learn to read history and not propaganda articles for a change it will help you out a lot in your life.
 
.
For the love of god/allah/muammar gaddafi/vladimir lenin/vladimir putin/george washington stay on topic.
 
.
The only reason Yemen, Iraq, Jordan and the rest of the GCC still exist today is thanks to the British pleading Abdulaziz not to invade their protectorates at the time.

In fact the first air bombings in Arabia's history was done by the British against King Abdulaziz's army that was unifying Hijaz. The British actively fought against King Abdulaziz until a deal was made where he will contend with his territory and that in return they would leave him alone.

This whole BS of "British supported and British funded" is nothing short of total historical ignorance. Learn to read history and not propaganda articles for a change it will help you out a lot in your life.

Don't bother with this Indian "Arab nationalist" ( :lol::omghaha::laughcry::rofl: ). He is one of those famous characters on PDF. A grown up man moreover which makes it even more frightening. As you can see there are already a few retards, none from the ancient ME they love to meddle in, that already have blamed KSA for this incident.:rofl: The logic being that we use beheadings with swords that are the most humane form of execution, the most cheap one, Islamic and the one that lasts 1 second. Apparently that equals beheadings with pocket knifes that take minutes which ISIS uses.:rofl: I guess France would have been in BIG, BIG trouble had we travelled 35 years back in time. The guillotine says hello.

Maybe they should blame KSA for everything that involves Islam and Muslims? After all Islam, Sunni Islam, Shia Islam, Sufism etc. originates in what is now KSA.

But let them live in their little deluded world. Who gives a pfuck really? The most important thing is that our society is safe and people live peacefully regardless of sect, ethnicity, clan, tribe, family, social status etc. and that our crime levels are one of the lowest in the world. After all laws are there to prevent crime first of all and other unwanted behavior. I don't see those retards crying about executions in the US, China, Mullahstan etc. and the more inhumane and prolonging methods those countries use or the much, much bigger number of executions they do.

Regarding the topic then obviously this is shocking and has nothing to do with Islam. The father is a retard too and I feel sorry for that woman. I hope that she has found peace wherever she is now.
 
Last edited:
.
I just saw the video. Makes it all the much more painful to watch if you can understand her pleading for mercy. How heartless can these people be?

That's because they are not humans, heck they arent even animals. No sane person will travel around the world, so he or she can kill .
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom